POLICY & PRACTICE

Rising mortality from injury in urban China: demographic burden, underlying causes and policy implications

Hausse de la mortalité par accident en Chine urbaine: importance démographique, causes sous-jacentes et implications politiques

Aumento de la mortalidad por lesiones en las zonas urbanas de China: carga demográfica, causas subyacentes e implicaciones políticas

Jiaying Zhao^{I, *}; Edward Jow-Ching Tu^II; Christine McMurray^I; Adrian Sleigh^III

^IThe Australian Demographic & Social Research Institute, Coombs Building #9, Fellows Road, the Australian National University, Canberra 0200, Australia
^IIDivision of Social Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
^IIINational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, the Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

ABSTRACT

In urban China, mortality from injuries has increased over the past five decades. By contrast, life expectancy has continued to increase and has come to nearly equal life expectancy in developed countries. Currently, most of the life expectancy lost due to injury (65%) in urban China would be recovered if injury rates were the same as in countries with low injury-related mortality. Fundamentally, the rising trend in urban injury mortality in China reflects a continued focus on injury treatment rather than prevention in the face of fast socioeconomic development and increasing exposure to risk factors for injury. Despite improved injury prevention legislation and a "Safe Community" campaign, urban China needs to modify its approach to urban injury management and focus on prevention. The gap between urban China and countries with low injury mortality can be closed by means of legislation, strengthened law enforcement and the establishment of safer communities. Risks affecting children and migrants deserve greater attention, and the government needs to allocate more resources to injury prevention, especially to urban areas in the central-west region of China. Based on the population size of urban China, measures for the prevention of injury mortality would save an annual 436.4 million years of life.

RÉSUMÉ

En Chine urbaine, la mortalité due à des accidents a augmenté au cours des cinq dernières décennies. En revanche, l'espérance de vie a continué d'augmenter pour quasiment atteindre l'espérance de vie observée dans les pays développés. Actuellement, la majeure partie de la perte d'espérance de vie par trauma (65%) en Chine urbaine serait récupérée si les taux d'accidents étaient les mêmes que dans les pays à faible mortalité liée aux traumatismes. Fondamentalement, la tendance à la hausse de la mortalité par accident en milieu urbain en Chine reflète une attention soutenue au traitement des lésions plutôt qu'à la prévention dans le contexte d'un développement socio-économique rapide et d'une exposition croissante aux facteurs de risque d'accident. Malgré une amélioration des mesures de prévention des accidents et une campagne de «sûreté communautaire», la Chine urbaine doit modifier son approche de la gestion des risques en milieu urbain et se concentrer sur la prévention. L'écart entre les zones urbaines chinoises et les pays à faible mortalité par traumatisme peut être réduit par la loi, un renforcement de l'application de la loi et l'établissement de communautés plus sûres. Les risques touchant les enfants et les migrants méritent une plus grande attention et le gouvernement doit allouer davantage de ressources à la prévention des accidents, en particulier dans les zones urbaines du centre-ouest de la Chine. Sur la base de la population urbaine chinoise, des mesures de prévention de la mortalité par traumatisme permettraient de sauver chaque année 436,4 millions d'années de vie.

RESUMEN

Durante las últimas cinco décadas se ha producido un aumento de la mortalidad por lesiones en las zonas urbanas de China. En contraste, la esperanza de vida ha seguido aumentando y ha llegado casi a equipararse a la esperanza de vida en los países desarrollados. Actualmente, la mayor reducción de la esperanza de vida asociada a las lesiones (65%) en las zonas urbanas de China podría subsanarse si las tasas de lesiones se equipararan a las de los países con baja mortalidad asociada a las lesiones. Fundamentalmente, esta tendencia creciente en la mortalidad urbana por lesiones en China es fiel reflejo de la prioridad que se otorga al tratamiento de las lesiones en lugar de a su prevención en un país con un fulgurante desarrollo socioeconómico y un aumento de la exposición a factores de riesgo de lesiones. Al margen de los intentos de mejorar la legislación en relación a las lesiones y de una campaña de Comunidad segura, las zonas urbanas de China han de modificar su enfoque con respecto a la gestión de lesiones urbanas y centrarse en su prevención. La brecha existente entre la China urbana y los países con baja mortalidad por lesiones podría estrecharse a través de la legislación, de un endurecimiento de la aplicación de la ley y del establecimiento de comunidades más seguras. Los riesgos que mayor atención merecen son aquellos que afectan a niños e inmigrantes y el gobierno necesita asignar más recursos a la prevención de lesiones, especialmente en áreas urbanas en la región centro-oriental de China. En base al tamaño de la población de la China urbana, se calcula que las medidas para la prevención de la mortalidad por lesiones podrían salvar cada año unos 436,4 millones de vidas.

By 2005, mortality rates in urban China had fallen so much that life expectancy had reached 76.2 years, nearly as high as in developed countries.¹ By 2009 life expectancy in the city of Shanghai had climbed even higher - to 79.4 years in males and 84.1 years in females - while in Sweden the corresponding figures were 79.4 and 83.5 years.^2-3 The drop in overall mortality in urban China has taken place, however, despite a pronounced rise in injury mortality in cities.⁴ Injury mortality in urban China is currently much higher than in urban areas in developed countries. This contrast between trends in overall mortality and in urban injury mortality takes place against a backdrop of rapid economic growth, unplanned urbanization, improved living standards and a rise in the risk of injury in urban areas.

The underlying causes of the rise in injury-related deaths in China's urban areas and its policy implications remain largely unexplored. This study aims to fill the gap by presenting evidence of this rise and examining its possible causes, contributing factors and policy implications. We argue that the upward trend in urban injury mortality is an outcome of fast socioeconomic development and a continued emphasis on saving the injured rather than on preventing injuries.

Mortality data in China

Our data came from multiple sources since no single source provides the data required to make secular estimates of injury mortality in Chinese cities. For the period from 1957 to 1995 we used the data cited by Zhao⁴ for crude, cause-specific mortality estimates. For more detailed analyses spanning the period from 1992 to 2005 we used data from the Chinese Disease Surveillance Points (DSP) system. More specifically, for 1992-1998 we used urban injury mortality data obtained directly from the DSP system, and for 2004-2005 we used data obtained indirectly from the DSP system via the Third National Retrospective Survey on Causes of Death (3rd NRSCD).

The 3rd NRSCD (May 2006 to January 2008) was a national retrospective survey in which all deaths detected in the DSP surveillance data for 2004-2005 were investigated through a review of clinical histories or verbal autopsies.^{1, 5} Data from this survey were enhanced by supplementation with mortality data obtained from police records, infant mortality data from population and family planning commissions and cremation records from civil administration agencies.¹ The 3rd NRSDC is a source of complete and reliable data on causes of death,¹ as demonstrated by comparison with census data. According to an expert review, its assignment of the cause of death has an accuracy rate of 97%.¹

Despite the above assurances, mortality data sets in China differ in their completeness and content validity.⁶ Rao et al. believe that China's mortality data may be failing to capture the true scale of the problem of injury mortality and have suggested a rate of underreporting in the DSP of approximately 13% overall and perhaps as high as 22% among children.⁷ Nevertheless, DSP data are the most geographically representative available in China, which explains why they have been used to make global burden of disease estimates.^{7, 8} Furthermore, Rao et al. acknowledge that the DSP system represents the national population, and that its cause-of-death mortality estimates have remained consistent over time.⁷

Injury mortality analyses

We conducted two analyses to try to better understand the rates of death from injury mortality derived from different measures. First we analysed age-specific and sex-specific death rates and age-standardized death rates (taking the age and sex structure of the world population in 2000 as the reference). We also employed double decrement life tables⁹ to estimate the gain in life expectancy that would result from eliminating all deaths from injury if the rates of death from other causes remained the same.

We estimate how much longer China's urban residents could live if deaths from injury were reduced to the low levels seen in developed countries. We used as benchmarks the rates of death from unintentional injury in Swedish children (0-14 years old) and Dutch adults (above 14 years of age) and from intentional injury in Greece (all age groups). Injury mortality rates in the chosen reference countries are low and the mortality data have almost 100% coverage and completeness, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).^10-12 We applied to urban China these countries' age- and sex-specific injury mortality rates (Appendix A and Appendix B, both available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/8988) by using double decrement life tables while retaining the prevailing non-injury mortality rates.

Injury mortality: 1957-2005

Over the past five decades, China has achieved impressive gains in survival and in other important socioeconomic parameters.⁶ However, unintentional and intentional injuries have become increasingly important causes of death in urban areas. Fifty years ago they ranked seventh among the causes of death, but since 1985 they have consistently ranked fourth (Appendix C, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/8988). A substantial increase in injury incidence has occurred since 1998, during the recent period of fast economic growth and urbanization (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). In 2004-2005, injuries, especially traffic accidents, suicide and falls, accounted for more than 40% of deaths in urban areas among people aged 1-34 years. Drowning was the leading cause of death from injury among children aged 0-14 years, whereas falls ranked first among people aged 75 years or older.

According to our calculations, if injury as a cause of death could be eradicated in urban China, life expectancy would increase by up to 1.44 years among males and 0.89 years among females (Table 1). Given the huge and expanding urban population, this would translate into very large numbers and would help China to close the longevity gap that separates it from developed countries. Our comparison of urban China's age-specific injury mortality rates with benchmark rates showed that injury-related loss of life expectancy in urban China could be reduced by nearly 90% for children less than 15 years of age, by more than 60% for working adults aged 15-64 years and by more than 50% for people aged over 65 years (Table 1). By bringing injury death rates in urban China down to the levels seen in benchmark countries, 0.28 years of life expectancy would be gained for transportation accidents, 0.11 years for drowning and 0.09 years for falls, respectively (Table 1). Furthermore, injury-related loss of life expectancy in urban China would be recovered by 65% overall, 64% in males and 68% in females. Based on the population of urban China in 2005 as estimated by a national survey with 1% population coverage, 436.4 million years of life lost due to injury in urban areas could be saved (Table 1).

Underlying causes and policy implications

In all societies, mortality can change quickly in response to political, social and economic changes.¹³ Accordingly, in recent decades urban development in China has been accompanied by a rise in mortality from injuries. However, little research has been conducted on the underlying causes of this increase or on appropriate remedial policies.

Many cross-sectional and secular analyses have shown that an inverted U captures the statistical relationship between changes in injury mortality and changes in per capita gross domestic product (GDP).^14-19 In other words, injury mortality initially increases as GDP per capita grows, but once the GDP exceeds a certain threshold, injury mortality falls with further economic growth.^{14, 16} However, the per capita GDP marking the turning points in injury mortality varies considerably across countries, even for a given injury category - from about 3000 to 15 000 United States dollars (US$).^14-19 These turning points reflect the adaptation of the national health-care system and of industrial, collective and personal countermeasures to lower injury risks, such as improved ambulance services, better occupational safety and helmet and seat belt use. Because injury mortality initially correlates with per capita GDP,^14-19 it is not surprising that China's urban prosperity over the past two decades (Table 2) has been accompanied by an increase in mortality from injury.

The rise in urban injury mortality results from an increase in exposure to injury risk factors associated with a growth in income, labour-intensive manufacturing, intensive construction and urban development. To date there has been little analysis of the putative risk factors for injury deaths in urban China. However, information for some leading Chinese cities shows how injury risk factors can vary over time in the face of rapid changes in the social and physical landscapes (Table 2).^{2, 20-26} The motorization rate and the urban population exposed to road traffic accidents both increase substantially with a rising GDP. The low reported rates of traffic fatalities reflect police underreporting (Table 2). In 2002-2007, road traffic death rates based on death registration data were almost twice as high as the rates based on data reported by the police.²⁷ Thus, the actual risk of death from traffic injuries may be much higher than shown in Table 2.

Table 2 shows the enormous growth in China's investment in fixed assets during the past two decades. The resulting economic growth in Chinese cities generates resources for health care and education, both of which lengthen life expectancy. But economic growth also increases occupational risks by boosting the number of largely uneducated workers in the construction industry²⁸ and by increasing exposure to dangerous industrial processes, high-rise buildings, rising population density and motorization rates. All of these factors heighten life-threatening risks.

Urban migrants are disproportionally exposed to hazardous environments. They are more likely to engage in high-risk occupations (e.g. construction workers) and they lack safety awareness and equipment.²⁸ In Shanghai for example, one study showed that in 2000-2005, injury accounted for 60% of overall mortality among migrants aged 15 to 39 years, and for 40% among local residents.²⁹ Furthermore, measurements are inaccurate because routine national mortality data in China are based on household registration rather than residence, so that the rates reported for urban China exclude migrant workers, who comprise a growing population in urban areas (Table 2). The plight of migrant workers is worsened by their lack of coverage with occupational injury insurance.³⁰

The approach to injury in Chinese cities has long focused on saving the injured rather than on preventing injuries; when a disastrous event occurs, resources are allocated to lessen fatalities and minimize economic losses. A recent fire in Shanghai serves to illustrate the relative indifference towards injury prevention on the part of both the government and the general public. The fire began on 15 November 2010 in downtown Shanghai and destroyed a 28-storey occupied apartment building under renovation, killing at least 58 people and injuring more than 70 others.³¹ In the report, the government attributed the disaster to several factors: unlicensed workers hired through illegal multiple subcontracting; lax fire safety requirements; lack of an indoor fire sprinkler system; inadequate fire-fighting capacity for a high-rise building, and a low degree of risk awareness on the part of the general public.³¹ Shortly after the fire, the municipal government announced a citywide drive to increase fire and safety inspections at buildings and construction sites. The Shanghai tragedy is not an isolated case; similar tragedies have occurred in many Chinese cities. Insufficient attention to injury prevention has resulted in thousands of deaths that could have been affordably prevented.

Countries with low injury-related mortality have occupational, residential, and traffic laws and practices designed to reduce the incidence of injury.^32-36 China also has many of these laws and is superficially comparable to Sweden in terms of legislation for preventing traffic injuries. Furthermore, China established an Injury Prevention Division within the National Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2002, and a National Injury Surveillance System was established in 2006. The Ministry of Health published its first report on injury prevention in 2007 and since 2009 has been developing a national injury prevention strategy in partnership with WHO.³⁷ Yet despite these institutional developments, injury prevention is not among the key health issues in the National Mid- & Long-term Science and Technology Development Planning Outline (2006-2020),³⁸ which includes all important national initiatives.

Many preventive measures are either not the subject of any law or the corresponding law is not tightly enforced. For instance, China has no laws preventing children aged less than 12 years from being home alone. In terms of traffic regulations, some important requirements (e.g. child restraint, cycling helmet, rear seat belt, hands-free mobile phone use) are not in place in China. Although front seat belt use is compulsory, usage rates are still very low.^{35, 39} Furthermore, mechanisms for monitoring and evaluating safety law enforcement are few, and staffing and funding are major constraints. Only two of 31 provincial CDCs have set up departments for injury prevention and control, and only one third of the staff responsible for injury prevention works full time.⁴⁰ In 2005-2008, the fraction of CDCs with more than 500 000 yuan (about US$77 000) in funding was 28% in eastern China, 29% in central China and 8% in western China.⁴⁰ The challenge, therefore, is for the relevant authorities to raise the priority of injury prevention within the national health agenda and to remove the institutional and financial constraints that hinder the implementation of prevention programmes.

Since the mid 2000s, China has worked in partnership with major international organizations such as The World Bank and WHO to undertake research and pilot programmes for general injury prevention.⁴¹ The safe community campaign is one of them. A "safe community" promotes safety and prevents injury, violence and suicide in all age groups.⁴² The tally of designated safe communities in China shows encouraging signs as well as challenges, as the country shifts towards injury prevention. China has participated in the community-based safety programme, under the safe community accreditation programme initiated by WHO, since 2006.⁴² On the positive side, by November 2011 the designated international safe communities in Chinese cities numbered 46 - a figure representing 20% of the global total - and another 27 such communities were in development.⁴² In addition, 244 communities had been designated as national-level safe communities by China's Occupational Safety and Health Association, an arm of the State Administration of Work Safety charged with promoting injury prevention.⁴³ While the tally suggests a degree of government commitment to help communities control intentional and unintentional injuries, it represents no more than 1% of the total number of urban communities. Moreover, the designated communities are concentrated in a few relatively developed cities of the eastern coastal area.^{42, 43} Nationwide, safety promotion is still very poor in urban China as a whole.

Conclusion

Mortality from injuries in urban China has risen over the past five decades as a result of increased exposure to risk factors related to economic prosperity. In response, Chinese cities have focused on rescuing the injured rather than on preventing injury.

Currently, most of the life expectancy in urban China lost to injury (65%) can be recovered by adopting measures designed to lower injury mortality to the levels seen in certain European countries. China must increase its focus on prevention, improve the quality of both death registration and non-fatal injury monitoring in urban areas, and include migrants in urban injury mortality surveillance. To achieve these aims, priority should be given to legislating or amending laws and regulations making it mandatory to use helmets and seat belts, to supervise children less than 12 years old in situations of potential danger, to fence swimming pools, to make packaging materials child resistant and to engage in safe drug and pesticide distribution practices. Laws for the prevention of occupational injuries are also needed. Human and financial resources need to be allocated in a way that will ensure that laws and regulations are enforced. Most of the laws and regulations mentioned have proved effective, affordable and feasible in developing countries and are recommended by The World Bank and WHO.^{32, 33, 44, 45} In Taiwan, China, for example, a 1997 law making helmet use mandatory has substantially lowered mortality from road traffic injury.^{19, 46}

Furthermore, community interventions should concentrate on local environments and on raising public awareness surrounding safety and how to prevent injuries, especially among children and migrants. Education for injury prevention has given good results and is affordable in developing countries.⁴⁵ The "Safe Community" programme in urban China shows that it is possible to create safer environments in Chinese cities, but the government needs to allocate more resources to injury prevention, especially to urban areas in the central-west region of China. Many effective interventions in countries with low injury mortality have shown the way. China should build on their example to change its approach to the control of injuries in urban areas.

Acknowledgements

We thank Zhongwei Zhao, Li Zhang, and Sage Leslie-McCarthy for their help and comments.

References

1. Ministry of Health. The report of the Third National Retrospective Survey for Death Causes. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press; 2008.         

2. Shanghai Municipal Statistical Bureau. Shanghai statistics yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press; 2011.         

3. Life expectancy in Sweden 2001-2010. Life expectancy tables for the country and by county. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden; 2011.         

4. Zhao Z. Changing mortality patterns and causes of death. In: Zhao Z, Guo F., editors. Transition and challenge: China's population at the beginning of the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. pp. 160-76.         

5. Yang G, Rao C, Ma J, Wang LJ, Wan X, Dubrovsky G et al. Validation of verbal autopsy procedures for adult deaths in China. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:741-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi181 PMID: 16144861        

6. Banister J, Hill K. Mortality in China 1964-2000. Popul Stud (Camb) 2004;58:55-75. doi: 10.1080/0032472032000183753 PMID: 15204262        

7. Rao C, Lopez AD, Yang GH, Begg S, Ma J. Evaluating national cause-of-death statistics: principles and application to the case of China. Bull World Health Organ 2005;83:618-25. PMID: 16184281        

8. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected in 2020. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1996.         

9. Preston SH, Heuveline P, Guillot M. Demography measuring and modeling population processes. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd; 2001.         

10. Petridou ET, Kyllekidis S, Jeffrey S, Chishti P, Dessypris N, Stone DH. Unintentional injury mortality in the European Union: how many more lives could be saved? Scand J Public Health 2007;35:278-87. doi: 10.1080/14034940600996662 PMID: 17530550        

11. Stone DH, Jeffrey S, Dessypris N, Kyllekidis S, Chishti P, Papadopoulos FC et al. Intentional injury mortality in the European Union: how many more lives could be saved? Inj Prev 2006;12:327-32. doi: 10.1136/ip.2006.012344 PMID: 17018676        

12. World Health Organization [Internet]. WHO Mortality Database. Geneva: WHO; 2012. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/morttables/en/ [accessed 10 April 2012]         

13. Preston SH. The changing relation between mortality and level of economic development. Popul Stud (Camb) 1975;29:231-48. PMID: 11630494        

14. Moniruzzaman S, Andersson R. Economic development as a determinant of injury mortality - a longitudinal approach. Soc Sci Med 2008;66:1699-708. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.12.020 PMID: 18308440        

15. Ahmed N, Andersson R. Differences in cause-specific patterns of unintentional injury mortality among 15-44-year-olds in income-based country groups. Accid Anal Prev 2002;34:541-51. doi: 10.1016/S0001- 4575(01)00052-5 PMID: 12067117        

16. van Beeck EF, Borsboom GJJ, Mackenbach JP. Economic development and traffic accident mortality in the industrialized world, 1962-1990. Int J Epidemiol 2000;29:503-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/29.3.503 PMID: 10869323        

17. Kopits E, Cropper M. Traffic fatalities and economic growth. Accid Anal Prev 2005;37:169-78. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.04.006 PMID: 15607288        

18. Bishai D, Quresh A, James P, Ghaffar A. National road casualties and economic development. Health Econ 2006;15:65-81. doi: 10.1002/hec.1020 PMID: 16145717        

19. Lu TH. A study of relationships between income and road traffic accident mortality [dissertation]. Taipei City: National Taiwan University, Institute of health Policy and Management; 2006.         

20. Shanghai Municipal Statistical Bureau. Shanghai statistics yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press; 1993.         

21. Beijing Municipal Statistical Bureau. Beijing statistics yearbook. Beijing, China Statistics Press; 1993.         

22. Guangzhou Municipal Statistical Bureau. Guangzhou statistics yearbook. Beijing, China Statistics Press; 1993.         

23. Xi'An Municipal Statistical Bureau. Xi'An statistics yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press; 1993.         

24. Beijing Municipal Statistical Bureau. Beijing statistics yearbook. Beijing, China Statistics Press; 2011.         

25. Guangzhou Municipal Statistical Bureau. Guangzhou statistics yearbook. Beijing, China Statistics Press; 2010.         

26. Xi'An Municipal Statistical Bureau. Xi'An statistics yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press; 2010.         

27. Hu G, Baker T, Baker SP. Comparing road traffic mortality rates from police-reported data and death registration data in China. Bull World Health Organ 2011;89:41-5. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.080317 PMID: 21346889        

28. Tam CM, Zeng SX, Deng ZM. Identifying elements of poor construction safety management in China. Saf Sci 2004;42:569-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2003.09.001

29. Report on the epidemiology of injury in Shanghai. Shanghai: Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008.         

30. Department of Floating Population Services and Management of National Population and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China. Report in 2010 on China's migrant population development. Beijing: China Population Press; 2011.         

31. Ni Y. City mourns victims of deadly apartment blaze. Shanghai Daily. 2010 22 November. Available from: http://www.shanghaidaily.com/sp/article/2010/201011/20101122/article_455210.htm [accessed 10 April 2012]          .

32. Peden M, Oyegbite K, Ozanne-Smith J, Hyder AA, Branche C, Rahman AKMF, et al. World report on child injury prevention. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.         

33. Peden M, Scurfield R, Sleet D, Mohan D, Hyder AA, Jarawan E, et al. World report on road traffic injury prevention. Geneva, World Health Organization; 2004.         

34. Jansson B, De Leon APD, Ahmed N, Jansson V. Why does Sweden have the lowest childhood injury mortality in the world? The roles of architecture and public pre-school services. J Public Health Policy 2006;27:146-65. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3200076 PMID: 16961194        

35. Wang SY, Li YH, Chi GB, Xiao SY, Ozanne-Smith J, Stevenson M et al. Injury-related fatalities in China: an under-recognised public-health problem. Lancet 2008;372:1765-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61367-7 PMID: 18930527        

36. Matching the lowest injury mortality rate could save half a million lives per year in Europe. Copenhagen: World Heath Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2006 (Fact Sheet EURO/02/06). Available from: www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/98607/fs0206e.pdf [accessed 28 March 2012]          .

37. Ministry of Health. People's Republic of China. China's report of injuryprevention in 2007. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House; 2007.         

38. The National Mid & Long-term Science and Technology Development Planning Outline (2006-2020). Beijing: State Council, People's Republic of China; 2006.         

39. Routley V, Ozanne-Smith J, Li D, Hu X, Wang P, Qin Y. Pattern of seat belt wearing in Nanjing, China. Inj Prev 2007;13:388-93. doi: 10.1136/ip.2007.015701 PMID: 18056315        

40. Yan HH, Dong XM, Chi GB, Wang SY. [Survey on the development regarding institution and professional contingence of injury prevention and strategy in China]Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2010;31:1086-9. PMID: 21162805        

41. China road traffic safety: the achievements, the challenges, and the way ahead. Washington: World Bank, China and Mongolia Sustainable Unit; 2008.         

42. WHO Collaborating Centre on Community Safety Promotion [Internet]. Safe communities. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet, Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Social Medicine; 2012. Available from: http://www.phs.ki.se/csp/index_en.htm [accessed 28 March 2012]         

43. China Occupational Safety and Health Association [Internet]. List of safe communities. Beijing: COSHA; 2012. Available from: http://www.cosha.org. cn/103275/103465/list.html [accessed 28 March 2012]         

44. Norton R, Hyder AA, Bishai D, Peden M. Unintentional injuries. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, Alleyne G, Claeson M, Evans, DB, et al., editors. Disease control priorities in developing countries. 2nd ed. Washington: World Bank; 2006. pp. 737-53.         

45. Forjuoh SN, Li G. A review of successful transport and home injury interventions to guide developing countries. Soc Sci Med 1996;43:1551-60. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00051-2 PMID: 8961399        

46. Lu TH, Lai CH, Chiang TL. Reducing regional inequality in mortality from road traffic injuries through enforcement of mandatory motorcycle helmet law in Taiwan. Inj Prev Epub2011. 2 Sep        

Submitted: 30 July 2011
Revised version received: 13 December 2011
Accepted: 14 December 2011
Published online: 23 April 2012
Competing interests: None declared.

* Correspondence to Jiaying Zhao (e-mail: jiaying.zhao@anu.edu.au).