ABSTRACT
Objective:
To evaluate the heterogeneity in the consumption of fresh or minimally processed foods (FMPF) and ultra-processed foods (UPF) in the Brazilian population ≥10 years of age.
Methods:
Cross-sectional study that used data from the food consumption and resident module from the 2017–2018 edition of the Family Budget Survey. Variables relating to sex, region of residence, household status and per capita family income in minimum wages were used. The outcomes were dietary participation in percentage of FMPF and UPF. Heterogeneity was assessed using random effects produced by linear mixed-effects models.
Results:
Thirty-two random effects were obtained for the consumption of FMPF and 34 for UPF. Living in the urban area of the South and Southeast regions, as well as having a higher income were driving factors in the consumption of UPF and reducing the consumption of FMPF. Living in a rural area and having low income were mainly reducing factors in the consumption of UPF and driving factors in the consumption of FMPF.
Conclusions:
The consumption of UPF and FMPF was determined by the set of factors that represented easy access to these foods, whether geographic or economic such as income.
Keywords:
Processed food,; Diet; Brazil; Food consumption; Diet surveys
INTRODUCTION
Fresh or minimally processed foods (FMPF) are those obtained directly from plants or animals that have not undergone any changes after leaving nature or have undergone minimal changes11 Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Levy R, Moubarac JC, Jaime P, Martins AP, et al. Classificação dos alimentos. Saúde Pública NOVA. A estrela brilha. World Nutr 2016; 7(1-3): 28-40.. They are characterized by not containing chemical additives, thus becoming the basis for a healthy diet22 Louzada MLC, Costa CS, Souza TN, Cruz GL, Levy RB, Monteiro CA. Impacto do consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados na saúde de crianças, adolescentes e adultos: revisão de escopo. Cad Saúde Pública 2021; 37(suppl 1): e00323020. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00323020
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X0032302... . In contrast, ultra-processed foods (UPF) are industrial products made based on FMPF or synthesized in a laboratory, which have added chemical compounds that alter their sensory properties11 Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Levy R, Moubarac JC, Jaime P, Martins AP, et al. Classificação dos alimentos. Saúde Pública NOVA. A estrela brilha. World Nutr 2016; 7(1-3): 28-40..
These foods differ according to their degree of processing, as well as the addition of artificial substances11 Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Levy R, Moubarac JC, Jaime P, Martins AP, et al. Classificação dos alimentos. Saúde Pública NOVA. A estrela brilha. World Nutr 2016; 7(1-3): 28-40.–33 Louzada MLC, Cruz GL, Silva KAAN, Grassi AGF, Andrade GC, Rauber F, et al. Consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados no Brasil: distribuição e evolução temporal 2008–2018. Rev Saúde Pública 2023; 57(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004744
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023... . The use of these industrial components in UPF guarantees a longer shelf life, palatability and some similarity with the FMPF to which they refer11 Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Levy R, Moubarac JC, Jaime P, Martins AP, et al. Classificação dos alimentos. Saúde Pública NOVA. A estrela brilha. World Nutr 2016; 7(1-3): 28-40..
The consumption of UPF has become a global concern, since their ingestion is associated with several harmful effects on health44 Pagliai G, Dinu M, Madarena MP, Bonaccio M, Iacoviello L, Sofi F. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr 2021; 125(3): 308-18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114520002688
https://doi.org/10.1017/S000711452000268... . However, despite being recognized as harmful to health, their consumption shows an increasing trend, possibly due to the practicality and hyperpalatability that they offer33 Louzada MLC, Cruz GL, Silva KAAN, Grassi AGF, Andrade GC, Rauber F, et al. Consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados no Brasil: distribuição e evolução temporal 2008–2018. Rev Saúde Pública 2023; 57(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004744
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023... ,55 Neri D, Steele EM, Khandpur N, Cediel G, Zapata ME, Rauber F, et al. Ultraprocessed food consumption and dietary nutrient profiles associated with obesity: a multicountry study of children and adolescents. Obes Rev 2022; 23 Suppl 1:e13387. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13387
https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13387... .
In Brazil, the consumption of UPF presents a diverse pattern, being higher among women, in the South and Southeast regions, as well as in populations with higher income and education, but with strong divergence regarding the classes of ultra-processed foods consumed33 Louzada MLC, Cruz GL, Silva KAAN, Grassi AGF, Andrade GC, Rauber F, et al. Consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados no Brasil: distribuição e evolução temporal 2008–2018. Rev Saúde Pública 2023; 57(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004744
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023... ,66 Shim JS, Shim SY, Cha HJ, Kim J, Kim HC. Socioeconomic characteristics and trends in the consumption of ultra-processed foods in Korea from 2010 to 2018. Nutrients 2021; 13(4): 1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041120
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041120... ,77 Khandpur N, Cediel G, Obando DA, Jaime PC, Parra DC. Sociodemographic factors associated with the consumption of ultra-processed foods in Colombia. Rev Saude Publica 2020; 54: 19. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001176
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020... . Furthermore, despite the overall downward trend in the consumption of these foods, Brazil faces a trend of progression possibly caused by overt marketing and practicality in the consumption of these products88 Moubarac JC, Claro RM, Baraldi LG, Levy RB, Martins APB, Cannon G, et al. International differences in cost and consumption of ready-to-consume food and drink products: United Kingdom and Brazil, 2008–2009. Glob Public Health 2013; 8(7): 845-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2013.796401
https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2013.79... . In contrast, populations with lower purchasing power, racialized populations and those living in rural areas tend to consume less of these industrial products and have a diet rich in FMPF33 Louzada MLC, Cruz GL, Silva KAAN, Grassi AGF, Andrade GC, Rauber F, et al. Consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados no Brasil: distribuição e evolução temporal 2008–2018. Rev Saúde Pública 2023; 57(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004744
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023... ,88 Moubarac JC, Claro RM, Baraldi LG, Levy RB, Martins APB, Cannon G, et al. International differences in cost and consumption of ready-to-consume food and drink products: United Kingdom and Brazil, 2008–2009. Glob Public Health 2013; 8(7): 845-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2013.796401
https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2013.79... .
Different studies have highlighted the sociodemographic effects on food consumption in Brazil, and usually use linear or generalized regression models to test their hypotheses44 Pagliai G, Dinu M, Madarena MP, Bonaccio M, Iacoviello L, Sofi F. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr 2021; 125(3): 308-18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114520002688
https://doi.org/10.1017/S000711452000268... . However, food consumption is a multi-motivated behavior that can be modified by combining a set of factors, and not just one alone. In this sense, mixed-effects regression models emerge as powerful statistical tools to consider the variation between individuals and groups99 Bernal JL, Cummins S, Gasparrini A. Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. Int J Epidemiol 2017; 46(1): 348-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw098
https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw098... .
When assessing the consumption of ultra-processed foods, these models can take into account individual factors — such as age, sex, education — and contextual factors — such as geographic region and income — to better understand the associations and predict changes over time. Thus, understanding the differences in the consumption patterns of ultra-processed foods is crucial for understanding and strategically targeting prevention and health promotion policies for a specific sector in order to mitigate the consumption of these foods, as well as prevent their harmful effects. By considering socioeconomic and demographic factors, specific interventions for higher-risk groups can be planned and implemented. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the heterogeneity in the consumption of FMPF and UPF by the Brazilian population ≥10 years of age.
METHODS
Design and sample
A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the personal food consumption module of the National Food Survey (INA) of the Household Budget Survey (POF) — a nationally representative survey conducted between July 2017 and June 2018 in Brazil1010 Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa de orçamentos familiares : 2017–2018 : análise do consumo alimentar pessoal no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2020.. Data collection used a complex two-stage cluster sampling plan, with census tracts being selected in the first stage and households in the second. The census tracts come from the master sample of the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), grouped into strata of households with high geographic homogeneity in the sector. Data collection took place throughout 2017 and 2018, divided into four quarters to consider dietary variability and foods at different times of the year1010 Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa de orçamentos familiares : 2017–2018 : análise do consumo alimentar pessoal no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2020..
The POF INA involved 46,164 residents aged ≥10 years in Brazil. The household sample was randomly selected, and all individuals in the target age group were invited to participate. By applying the sampling plan, information was obtained from 52,906,759 Brazilians aged ≥10 years1010 Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa de orçamentos familiares : 2017–2018 : análise do consumo alimentar pessoal no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2020..
Personal food consumption
The individuals’ food consumption was assessed through two food records applied on two non-consecutive days using the Automated Multiple-Step Method1111 Steinfeldt L, Anand J, Murayi T. Food reporting patterns in the USDA automated multiple-pass method. Procedia Food Sci 2013; 2: 145-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2013.04.022
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2013.04... . In several steps, information was collected on all foods consumed on the day before the application, their quantities in household measurements, method of preparation and, for some pre-determined foods, information was requested on the addition of ingredients such as sugars, sweeteners and oils.
Foods with quantities considered unlikely or absent were imputed using the similarity matrix method1212 Andridge RR, Little RJA. A review of hot deck imputation for survey non-response. Int Stat Rev 2010; 78(1): 40-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00103.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010... based on variables correlated with the possible quantity consumed. The foods were combined with the food codes present in the Brazilian Food Composition Table (TBCA) 1313 Rede Brasileira de Dados de Composição de Alimentos. Universidade de São Paulo. Food Research Center. Tabela brasileira de composição de alimentos [Internet]. 2023 [accessed on Oct 30, 2024]. Available at: https://www.tbca.net.br/
https://www.tbca.net.br/... , while the preparations were disaggregated considering the standardized TBCA recipes. Finally, the reported/imputed quantity of each food was converted into kilocalories (kcal) using the TBCA information.
Subsequently, the foods were classified according to the NOVA11 Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Levy R, Moubarac JC, Jaime P, Martins AP, et al. Classificação dos alimentos. Saúde Pública NOVA. A estrela brilha. World Nutr 2016; 7(1-3): 28-40. criteria into FMPF, culinary ingredients, processed foods and UPF. The classification of UPF followed the concept that they are industrial formulations obtained through the fractionation of foods from FMPF11 Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Levy R, Moubarac JC, Jaime P, Martins AP, et al. Classificação dos alimentos. Saúde Pública NOVA. A estrela brilha. World Nutr 2016; 7(1-3): 28-40..
For this work, the percentage shares of energy provided by UPF and FMPF were considered outcomes, which were obtained through the equation:
Sociodemographic variables
Sociodemographic information was collected through standardized questionnaires to inform residents. The following variables were used: sex (male/female), household situation (urban/rural), region of residence (North, Northeast, South, Southeast and Central-West) and per capita family income based on ¼ of the minimum wage in force in 2018 (<¼/≥¼).
Data analysis
Initially, categorical data were described in absolute (n) and relative (%) frequencies. Continuous variables had their normality assumptions tested using the one-sample asymptotic Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, which were rejected when p<0.05, and were therefore described in medians and interquartile ranges (IQR). Since this was a study with complex sampling, sample weights were considered in all analyses.
Mixed effects models
To determine the natural heterogeneity among individuals resulting from sociodemographic or environmental factors, mixed linear models were tested. In this regression model, the coefficients (β) are called fixed effects, while the variances and covariances (α) are called variance components. In addition, there is the presence of an individual measure that will differ from the observed mean of the outcome, which is called random error. These random effects will indicate the natural heterogeneity among individuals resulting from the set of observed factors.
In the end, the observed random effects will designate a mathematical measure that will indicate how a set of factors behaves in relation to the observed mean of the outcome. For this study, models containing the following variables were tested: region of residence, household situation, sex and per capita family income. The random effects obtained are the result of the combinatorial analysis of the number of categories contained in each variable inserted in the model, namely, 40 random effects were obtained (5×2×2×2). However, only those that did not include the value 0 in their 95% confidence interval were considered significant random effects. To better represent the effects of sociodemographic factors on the outcomes, dot plots were used.
The analyses were performed in the open access statistical program R (R Core Team, 2023). The linear mixed models were tested using the lme41414 Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 2017; 82(13): 1-26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13... and lmer packages, and the sample weights were included using the survey1515 Lumley T. Analysis of complex survey samples. Journal of Statistical Software 2004; 9(8): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v009.i08
https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v009.i08... package for sample expansion.
Ethical aspects
The data for this study come from an open access information system, and we therefore dispensed with the requirement for prior request to government agencies or institutions and approval by a research ethics committee.
RESULTS
Description of sample
The population assessed stood out for being mostly women (54.1%), with an average age of 39 years, who lived in urban areas (85%) and in the Southeast region of the country (43.2%). Furthermore, the median per capita family income of the individuals was R$899.20 (R$457.60 to R$1609.90) (Table 1). The population's diet was predominantly composed of FMPF (55.3%), with UPF coming in second with 37.5% (Table 1).
Sociodemographic and food consumption description of Brazilian individuals ≥10 years of age. Brazil, 2017-2018.
Heterogeneity in the consumption of ultra-processed foods
Regarding UPF consumption, 34 random effects were significant, with 19 of them (55.9%) driving the average UPF share in the diet of individuals (Figure 1 and Table 2). It is noteworthy that the factors with the greatest driving effect on UPF consumption were similar in that they included conditions such as living in urban areas in the South of the country, followed by the Southeast region, while having a per capita income above ¼ of the minimum wage for both sexes, but still higher for women. Next, living in rural areas of the country appeared only twice in the 19 effects that increased UPF consumption (10.5%), but again associated with the South region with higher income for both sexes. In the factors that reduced UPF consumption (44.1%), there was a strong presence of individuals who lived in rural areas and had lower per capita income, living mainly in the North and Northeast regions (Table 2).
Random effects dot plot on the consumption of natural or minimally processed foods and ultra-processed foods in the Brazilian population ≥10 years of age. Brazil, 2017–2018.
Random effects on the consumption of ultra-processed foods in Brazilian individuals ≥10 years of age, 2017-2018.
Heterogeneity in the consumption of fresh or minimally processed foods
Regarding the consumption of FMPF, 32 significant random effects were observed, with 14 of them (43.8%) driving its average share (Figure 1 and Table 3). In this food group, the strong presence of rural areas can be highlighted, as well as living in the North, Northeast and Central-West regions, and having a low income. Furthermore, the absence of the South of the country in any effect is noted.
Random effects on the consumption of fresh or minimally processed foods in Brazilian individuals ≥10 years of age,. Brazil, 2017-2018.
Regarding the factors that reduced the consumption of FMPF (56.2%), the most prevalent factors identified were living in urban areas, especially in the South and Southeast regions, as well as having a higher family income, diametrically opposed factors on the consumption of UPF (Table 3).
DISCUSSION
The consumption of UPF among the individuals evaluated was high and quite heterogeneous. All geographic macro-regions were found to be drivers of UPF consumption, but the South and Southeast stood out, as well as the majority being located in urban areas and having an income above ¼ of the minimum wage. Such factors may be associated with the provision of conditions that facilitate access to these food products. In contrast, FMPF foods were found in the North, Northeast and Central-West regions, especially in low-income strata and rural areas, which may possibly indicate cultivation environments and greater access to these foods.
In addition, it is noteworthy that the consumption of FMPF was over half of the energy consumption of the Brazilian population, which can be explained by the Western or traditional Brazilian dietary patterns, which are composed mainly of the consumption of bread, coffee, rice, beans, animal protein and some salad option1616 Borges CA, Marchioni DML, Levy RB, Slater B. Dietary patterns associated with overweight among Brazilian adolescents. Appetite 2018; 123: 402-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.... –1919 Arruda SPM, Silva AAM, Kac G, Goldani MZ, Bettiol H, Barbieri MA. Socioeconomic and demographic factors are associated with dietary patterns in a cohort of young Brazilian adults. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 654. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-654
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-654... . However, when observing the consumption of UPF, a high dietary participation is noted, being almost a third of the total usual intake of the population. It is important to note that there is still no upper limit for UPF consumption, but it is suggested that its dietary contribution be as low as possible2020 Vandevijvere S, De Ridder K, Fiolet T, Bel S, Tafforeau J. Consumption of ultra-processed food products and diet quality among children, adolescents and adults in Belgium. Eur J Nutr 2019; 58(8): 3267-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-018-1870-3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-018-1870-... .
Studies indicate that there is significant heterogeneity in the consumption of FMPF and UPF in different populations around the world, with the highest consumption of the latter concentrated in urban and more developed areas44 Pagliai G, Dinu M, Madarena MP, Bonaccio M, Iacoviello L, Sofi F. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr 2021; 125(3): 308-18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114520002688
https://doi.org/10.1017/S000711452000268... ,66 Shim JS, Shim SY, Cha HJ, Kim J, Kim HC. Socioeconomic characteristics and trends in the consumption of ultra-processed foods in Korea from 2010 to 2018. Nutrients 2021; 13(4): 1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041120
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041120... ,77 Khandpur N, Cediel G, Obando DA, Jaime PC, Parra DC. Sociodemographic factors associated with the consumption of ultra-processed foods in Colombia. Rev Saude Publica 2020; 54: 19. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001176
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020... ,2121 Juul F, Lin Y, Deierlein AL, Vaidean G, Parekh N. Trends in food consumption by degree of processing and diet quality over 17 years: results from the Framingham Offspring Study. Br J Nutr 2021; 126(12): 1861-71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000711452100060X
https://doi.org/10.1017/S000711452100060... –2424 Imamura F, Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Fahimi S, Shi P, Powles J, et al. Dietary quality among men and women in 187 countries in 1990 and 2010: a systematic assessment. Lancet Glob Health 2015; 3(3): e132-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70381-X
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70... . Previous findings from the POF itself reinforce that the participation of UPF in the diet of Brazilians is strongly related to the place of residence, with states from the South and Southeast regions being those with the highest consumption, as well as the highest level of education, age and household situation33 Louzada MLC, Cruz GL, Silva KAAN, Grassi AGF, Andrade GC, Rauber F, et al. Consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados no Brasil: distribuição e evolução temporal 2008–2018. Rev Saúde Pública 2023; 57(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004744
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023... .
Despite the recognized differences in food consumption patterns caused by the age of individuals66 Shim JS, Shim SY, Cha HJ, Kim J, Kim HC. Socioeconomic characteristics and trends in the consumption of ultra-processed foods in Korea from 2010 to 2018. Nutrients 2021; 13(4): 1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041120
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041120... ,77 Khandpur N, Cediel G, Obando DA, Jaime PC, Parra DC. Sociodemographic factors associated with the consumption of ultra-processed foods in Colombia. Rev Saude Publica 2020; 54: 19. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001176
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020... ,2222 Baraldi LG, Steele EM, Canella DS, Monteiro CA. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and associated sociodemographic factors in the USA between 2007 and 2012: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2018; 8(3): e020574. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020... , in this study this variable was not added to the mixed linear model, as it did not show a significant effect on consumption when considering the different intersections with the other sociodemographic factors.
The effects of these factors on the consumption of UPF are widely studied singly; however, it is important to highlight that there are different degrees of magnitude on consumption when considering the intersection between one or more sociodemographic conditions. The effects of living in urban or rural areas, for example, are recognized as distinct on the consumption of UPF or FMPF, since conditions such as the ability to penetrate more remote areas and a strong presence of agricultural products in rural areas are considered33 Louzada MLC, Cruz GL, Silva KAAN, Grassi AGF, Andrade GC, Rauber F, et al. Consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados no Brasil: distribuição e evolução temporal 2008–2018. Rev Saúde Pública 2023; 57(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004744
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023... ,2525 Bi J, Liu C, Li S, He Z, Chen K, Luo R, et al. Dietary diversity among preschoolers: a cross-sectional study in poor, rural, and ethnic minority areas of central south China. Nutrients 2019; 11(3): 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030558
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030558... ,2626 Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Avezum Jr A, Orlandini A, et al. Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet 2015; 386(9990): 266-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62000-6
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62... . However, this study identified that in the southern region of Brazil, regardless of being a rural area, the participation of UPF in the diet of individuals was still higher than the national average. This may have been due to the greater development of the region compared to other areas of the country, as well as issues related to access and purchasing power1818 Alves ALS, Olinto MTA, Costa JSD, Bairros FS, Balbinotti MAA. Dietary patterns of adult women living in an urban area of Southern Brazil. Rev Saude Publica 2006; 40(5): 865-73. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89102006000600017
https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-8910200600... ,2727 Freedman DA, Clark JK, Lounsbury DW, Boswell L, Burns M, Jackson MB, et al. Food system dynamics structuring nutrition equity in racialized urban neighborhoods. Am J Clin Nutr 2022; 115(4): 1027-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqab380
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqab380... ,2828 Hales CM, Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Freedman DS, Aoki Y, Ogden CL. Differences in obesity prevalence by demographic characteristics and urbanization level among adults in the United States, 2013-2016. JAMA 2018; 319(23): 2419-29. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.7270
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.7270... .
It is worth noting that higher income is a factor that may be associated with guaranteed access to ultra-processed products2929 Barros FC, Victora CG, Scherpbier R, Gwatkin D. Socioeconomic inequities in the health and nutrition of children in low/middle income countries. Rev Saude Publica 2010; 44(1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89102010000100001
https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-8910201000... –3131 Muhammad A, D’Souza A, Meade B, Micha R, Mozaffarian D. How income and food prices influence global dietary intakes by age and sex: evidence from 164 countries. BMJ Glob Health 2017; 2(3): e000184. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000184
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2016-00018... , which, together with living in regions with low penetration of these products, such as rural areas, justifies the strong reduction in the participation of these products3232 Oliveira RR, Peter NB, Muniz LC. Consumo alimentar segundo grau de processamento entre adolescentes da zona rural de um município do sul do Brasil. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva 2021; 26(3): 1105-14. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021263.06502019
https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021263... .
Regarding the participation of FMPF in the diet, it was observed that its consumption was dictated by access conditions. The greatest consumption of these products was mainly in rural regions, which are usually agricultural centers with easier access to fresh food and, usually, with lower prices, as well as the geographic regions that appeared are the least industrialized2525 Bi J, Liu C, Li S, He Z, Chen K, Luo R, et al. Dietary diversity among preschoolers: a cross-sectional study in poor, rural, and ethnic minority areas of central south China. Nutrients 2019; 11(3): 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030558
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030558... ,3232 Oliveira RR, Peter NB, Muniz LC. Consumo alimentar segundo grau de processamento entre adolescentes da zona rural de um município do sul do Brasil. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva 2021; 26(3): 1105-14. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021263.06502019
https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021263... . Thus, it is suggested that the consumption of FMPF, in addition to taking into account factors such as geographic proximity and ease of access to these foods, may also be dependent on the lack of competitiveness with a greater variety of UPF55 Neri D, Steele EM, Khandpur N, Cediel G, Zapata ME, Rauber F, et al. Ultraprocessed food consumption and dietary nutrient profiles associated with obesity: a multicountry study of children and adolescents. Obes Rev 2022; 23 Suppl 1:e13387. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13387
https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13387... ,3333 Costa CS, Faria FR, Gabe KT, Sattamini IF, Khandpur N, Leite FHM, et al. Escore Nova de consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados: descrição e avaliação de desempenho no Brasil. Rev Saúde Pública 2021; 55: 13. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003588
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021... .
Conditions such as income can also be strong determinants, since the population with the lowest income in these regions may be small rural producers who depend almost exclusively on their own crops2525 Bi J, Liu C, Li S, He Z, Chen K, Luo R, et al. Dietary diversity among preschoolers: a cross-sectional study in poor, rural, and ethnic minority areas of central south China. Nutrients 2019; 11(3): 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030558
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030558... ,3232 Oliveira RR, Peter NB, Muniz LC. Consumo alimentar segundo grau de processamento entre adolescentes da zona rural de um município do sul do Brasil. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva 2021; 26(3): 1105-14. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021263.06502019
https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021263... . Furthermore, despite the strong effect of rural household conditions on the consumption of FMPF, it is important to emphasize that even in these areas, rural populations in the Southeast and South had lower averages of these foods, possibly due to access issues previously elucidated in this study, as well as industrialization33 Louzada MLC, Cruz GL, Silva KAAN, Grassi AGF, Andrade GC, Rauber F, et al. Consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados no Brasil: distribuição e evolução temporal 2008–2018. Rev Saúde Pública 2023; 57(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004744
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023... ,3434 Silva LES, Claro RM. Tendências temporais do consumo de frutas e hortaliças entre adultos nas capitais brasileiras e Distrito Federal, 2008-2016. Cad Saúde Pública 2019; 35(5): e00023618. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00023618
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X0002361... ,3535 Canella DS, Martins APB, Bandoni DH. Iniquidades no acesso aos benefícios alimentação e refeição no Brasil: uma análise da Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2008-2009. Cad Saúde Pública 2016; 32(3): e00037815. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00037815
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X0003781... .
The role of sex in food consumption is quite heterogeneous in the literature. Some authors point out that women are usually more concerned about their health status and therefore have lower consumption of UPF66 Shim JS, Shim SY, Cha HJ, Kim J, Kim HC. Socioeconomic characteristics and trends in the consumption of ultra-processed foods in Korea from 2010 to 2018. Nutrients 2021; 13(4): 1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041120
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041120... ,2424 Imamura F, Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Fahimi S, Shi P, Powles J, et al. Dietary quality among men and women in 187 countries in 1990 and 2010: a systematic assessment. Lancet Glob Health 2015; 3(3): e132-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70381-X
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70... ,3131 Muhammad A, D’Souza A, Meade B, Micha R, Mozaffarian D. How income and food prices influence global dietary intakes by age and sex: evidence from 164 countries. BMJ Glob Health 2017; 2(3): e000184. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000184
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2016-00018... . This role is controversial, since some classes of UPF may have more overt advertising targeting the female public and are not considered unhealthy33 Louzada MLC, Cruz GL, Silva KAAN, Grassi AGF, Andrade GC, Rauber F, et al. Consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados no Brasil: distribuição e evolução temporal 2008–2018. Rev Saúde Pública 2023; 57(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004744
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023... . However, strong heterogeneity was observed, in which there was no emphasis on higher or lower consumption of UPF or FMPF in either sex. It is suggested that the conditions of each individual's immediate surroundings have a greater effect on consumption.
Furthermore, it is important to emphasize that the data used in this study are from the 2017-2018 edition of the POF. However, it is possible to expect that after the COVID-19 pandemic, the increase in UPF consumption in Brazil has continued, especially in large centers, due to social isolation and the preference for ready-to-eat foods3636 Costa FF, Rosa IR, Pinho L, Silva MLPD. Pandemia da Covid-19. Revista Unimontes Científica 2020; 22(2): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.46551/ruc.v22n2a04
https://doi.org/10.46551/ruc.v22n2a04... ,3737 Raphaelli CO, Figueiredo MF, Pereira ES, Granada GG. A pandemia de COVID-19 no Brasil favoreceu o consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados? Brazilian Applied Science Review 2021; 5(3): 1297-313. https://doi.org/10.34115/basrv5n3-002
https://doi.org/10.34115/basrv5n3-002... . However, it is possible that in rural regions and regions further away from urban centers the preference for FMPF foods has remained, making it possible to maintain the panorama of heterogeneity observed.
The strengths of this study include a nationally representative probabilistic sample and the use of a robust statistical analysis that promotes the interaction of different sociodemographic conditions and their effects on the dietary participation of UPF and FMPF in the diet of the Brazilian population. The mixed-effects regression models used allow for a more flexible approach when compared to traditional regression models. Since traditional models use only explanatory variables and their effect on an outcome, mixed-effects models include both fixed and random parameters, allowing the estimation of variability between individuals or groups3838 Silveira LTY, Ferreira JC, Patino CM. Modelo de efeitos mistos: uma ferramenta estatística útil para estudos longitudinais e de cluster. J Bras Pneumol 2023; 49(2): e20230137. https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20230137
https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e2023... . By including random effects, mixed-effects models capture the correlation between observations within the same groups or individuals, resulting in more accurate estimates of population parameters and better reflecting the variability between groups3838 Silveira LTY, Ferreira JC, Patino CM. Modelo de efeitos mistos: uma ferramenta estatística útil para estudos longitudinais e de cluster. J Bras Pneumol 2023; 49(2): e20230137. https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20230137
https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e2023... .
Furthermore, this study is the first to assess the consumption of FMPF and UPF from a nationally representative sample using robust analyses such as mixed linear models. The use of this analysis allows the identification of consumption patterns of both food groups, considering the intersection of a set of sociodemographic factors. In this way, it is possible to observe with greater clarity and depth the dynamics of consumption of these foods through different factors that make up the immediate environment of different Brazilian population groups.
This method allows the observation of different combinations of factors that lead to greater or lesser participation compared to the usual observation of isolated associated factors. However, limitations may arise from potential overestimations or underestimations of some food groups and differences between culinary recipes compared to what is standardized in food composition tables. However, to minimize these biases, validated food survey methods were used, as well as all culinary preparations were broken down to obtain the isolated composition of each ingredient that composes it.
Finally, this study provides a strong contribution to the national and international literature by describing the effects of different sociodemographic conditions on the dietary participation of UPF and FMPF in the Brazilian population aged ≥10 years. Widely recognized conditions on UPF and FMPF consumption were observed and confirmed, but different mechanisms of interaction between them were understood, reinforcing the consumption of these food groups as dependent on access conditions. The heterogeneity in UPF and FMPF consumption could be perceived as highly dependent on conditions that favor or hinder access to these foods, especially sociodemographic characteristics such as income and place of residence. Furthermore, through the results of this work, understanding the focal groups most exposed to the consumption of UPF and its future harmful effects, as well as lower consumption of FMPF, will allow food and nutrition departments and coordinators to understand the effects of existing food and nutrition surveillance actions and be able to target specific population segments to mitigate the consumption of UPF or encourage the consumption of FMPF.
FUNDING:
none.
REFERENCES
- 1Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Levy R, Moubarac JC, Jaime P, Martins AP, et al. Classificação dos alimentos. Saúde Pública NOVA. A estrela brilha. World Nutr 2016; 7(1-3): 28-40.
- 2Louzada MLC, Costa CS, Souza TN, Cruz GL, Levy RB, Monteiro CA. Impacto do consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados na saúde de crianças, adolescentes e adultos: revisão de escopo. Cad Saúde Pública 2021; 37(suppl 1): e00323020. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00323020
» https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00323020 - 3Louzada MLC, Cruz GL, Silva KAAN, Grassi AGF, Andrade GC, Rauber F, et al. Consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados no Brasil: distribuição e evolução temporal 2008–2018. Rev Saúde Pública 2023; 57(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004744
» https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004744 - 4Pagliai G, Dinu M, Madarena MP, Bonaccio M, Iacoviello L, Sofi F. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr 2021; 125(3): 308-18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114520002688
» https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114520002688 - 5Neri D, Steele EM, Khandpur N, Cediel G, Zapata ME, Rauber F, et al. Ultraprocessed food consumption and dietary nutrient profiles associated with obesity: a multicountry study of children and adolescents. Obes Rev 2022; 23 Suppl 1:e13387. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13387
» https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13387 - 6Shim JS, Shim SY, Cha HJ, Kim J, Kim HC. Socioeconomic characteristics and trends in the consumption of ultra-processed foods in Korea from 2010 to 2018. Nutrients 2021; 13(4): 1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041120
» https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041120 - 7Khandpur N, Cediel G, Obando DA, Jaime PC, Parra DC. Sociodemographic factors associated with the consumption of ultra-processed foods in Colombia. Rev Saude Publica 2020; 54: 19. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001176
» https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001176 - 8Moubarac JC, Claro RM, Baraldi LG, Levy RB, Martins APB, Cannon G, et al. International differences in cost and consumption of ready-to-consume food and drink products: United Kingdom and Brazil, 2008–2009. Glob Public Health 2013; 8(7): 845-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2013.796401
» https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2013.796401 - 9Bernal JL, Cummins S, Gasparrini A. Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. Int J Epidemiol 2017; 46(1): 348-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw098
» https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw098 - 10Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa de orçamentos familiares : 2017–2018 : análise do consumo alimentar pessoal no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2020.
- 11Steinfeldt L, Anand J, Murayi T. Food reporting patterns in the USDA automated multiple-pass method. Procedia Food Sci 2013; 2: 145-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2013.04.022
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2013.04.022 - 12Andridge RR, Little RJA. A review of hot deck imputation for survey non-response. Int Stat Rev 2010; 78(1): 40-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00103.x
» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00103.x - 13Rede Brasileira de Dados de Composição de Alimentos. Universidade de São Paulo. Food Research Center. Tabela brasileira de composição de alimentos [Internet]. 2023 [accessed on Oct 30, 2024]. Available at: https://www.tbca.net.br/
» https://www.tbca.net.br/ - 14Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 2017; 82(13): 1-26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
» https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 - 15Lumley T. Analysis of complex survey samples. Journal of Statistical Software 2004; 9(8): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v009.i08
» https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v009.i08 - 16Borges CA, Marchioni DML, Levy RB, Slater B. Dietary patterns associated with overweight among Brazilian adolescents. Appetite 2018; 123: 402-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.001
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.001 - 17Barros NERP, Moreno LA, Arruda SPM, Assis RC, Celedonio RF, Silva FRA, et al. Association between eating patterns and excess body weight in adolescents. Child Obes. 2021; 17(6): 400-7. https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2020.0265
» https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2020.0265 - 18Alves ALS, Olinto MTA, Costa JSD, Bairros FS, Balbinotti MAA. Dietary patterns of adult women living in an urban area of Southern Brazil. Rev Saude Publica 2006; 40(5): 865-73. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89102006000600017
» https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89102006000600017 - 19Arruda SPM, Silva AAM, Kac G, Goldani MZ, Bettiol H, Barbieri MA. Socioeconomic and demographic factors are associated with dietary patterns in a cohort of young Brazilian adults. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 654. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-654
» https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-654 - 20Vandevijvere S, De Ridder K, Fiolet T, Bel S, Tafforeau J. Consumption of ultra-processed food products and diet quality among children, adolescents and adults in Belgium. Eur J Nutr 2019; 58(8): 3267-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-018-1870-3
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-018-1870-3 - 21Juul F, Lin Y, Deierlein AL, Vaidean G, Parekh N. Trends in food consumption by degree of processing and diet quality over 17 years: results from the Framingham Offspring Study. Br J Nutr 2021; 126(12): 1861-71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000711452100060X
» https://doi.org/10.1017/S000711452100060X - 22Baraldi LG, Steele EM, Canella DS, Monteiro CA. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and associated sociodemographic factors in the USA between 2007 and 2012: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2018; 8(3): e020574. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574
» https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574 - 23Popkin BM, Adair LS, Ng SW. Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. Nutr Rev 2012; 70(1): 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00456.x
» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00456.x - 24Imamura F, Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Fahimi S, Shi P, Powles J, et al. Dietary quality among men and women in 187 countries in 1990 and 2010: a systematic assessment. Lancet Glob Health 2015; 3(3): e132-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70381-X
» https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70381-X - 25Bi J, Liu C, Li S, He Z, Chen K, Luo R, et al. Dietary diversity among preschoolers: a cross-sectional study in poor, rural, and ethnic minority areas of central south China. Nutrients 2019; 11(3): 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030558
» https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030558 - 26Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Avezum Jr A, Orlandini A, et al. Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet 2015; 386(9990): 266-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62000-6
» https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62000-6 - 27Freedman DA, Clark JK, Lounsbury DW, Boswell L, Burns M, Jackson MB, et al. Food system dynamics structuring nutrition equity in racialized urban neighborhoods. Am J Clin Nutr 2022; 115(4): 1027-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqab380
» https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqab380 - 28Hales CM, Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Freedman DS, Aoki Y, Ogden CL. Differences in obesity prevalence by demographic characteristics and urbanization level among adults in the United States, 2013-2016. JAMA 2018; 319(23): 2419-29. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.7270
» https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.7270 - 29Barros FC, Victora CG, Scherpbier R, Gwatkin D. Socioeconomic inequities in the health and nutrition of children in low/middle income countries. Rev Saude Publica 2010; 44(1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89102010000100001
» https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89102010000100001 - 30Jeffries JK, Lee SH, Frick KD, Gittelsohn J. Preferences for healthy carryout meals in low-income neighborhoods of Baltimore city. Health Promot Pract 2013; 14(2): 293-300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839912465290
» https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839912465290 - 31Muhammad A, D’Souza A, Meade B, Micha R, Mozaffarian D. How income and food prices influence global dietary intakes by age and sex: evidence from 164 countries. BMJ Glob Health 2017; 2(3): e000184. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000184
» https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000184 - 32Oliveira RR, Peter NB, Muniz LC. Consumo alimentar segundo grau de processamento entre adolescentes da zona rural de um município do sul do Brasil. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva 2021; 26(3): 1105-14. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021263.06502019
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021263.06502019 - 33Costa CS, Faria FR, Gabe KT, Sattamini IF, Khandpur N, Leite FHM, et al. Escore Nova de consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados: descrição e avaliação de desempenho no Brasil. Rev Saúde Pública 2021; 55: 13. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003588
» https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003588 - 34Silva LES, Claro RM. Tendências temporais do consumo de frutas e hortaliças entre adultos nas capitais brasileiras e Distrito Federal, 2008-2016. Cad Saúde Pública 2019; 35(5): e00023618. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00023618
» https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00023618 - 35Canella DS, Martins APB, Bandoni DH. Iniquidades no acesso aos benefícios alimentação e refeição no Brasil: uma análise da Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2008-2009. Cad Saúde Pública 2016; 32(3): e00037815. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00037815
» https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00037815 - 36Costa FF, Rosa IR, Pinho L, Silva MLPD. Pandemia da Covid-19. Revista Unimontes Científica 2020; 22(2): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.46551/ruc.v22n2a04
» https://doi.org/10.46551/ruc.v22n2a04 - 37Raphaelli CO, Figueiredo MF, Pereira ES, Granada GG. A pandemia de COVID-19 no Brasil favoreceu o consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados? Brazilian Applied Science Review 2021; 5(3): 1297-313. https://doi.org/10.34115/basrv5n3-002
» https://doi.org/10.34115/basrv5n3-002 - 38Silveira LTY, Ferreira JC, Patino CM. Modelo de efeitos mistos: uma ferramenta estatística útil para estudos longitudinais e de cluster. J Bras Pneumol 2023; 49(2): e20230137. https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20230137
» https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20230137
Publication Dates
- Publication in this collection
16 Dec 2024 - Date of issue
2024
History
- Received
09 June 2024 - Reviewed
05 Oct 2024 - Accepted
21 Oct 2024