Misinformation, disinformation, and fake news amid the new global Mpox emergency

Francy Waltília Cruz Araújo Silvia Maria da Silva Sant’Ana Rodrigues Thialla Andrade Carvalho Danilo Santos de Sousa Martha Débora Lira Tenório Paulo Ricardo Martins-Filho About the authors

Keywords
Mpox; monkeypox virus; disinformation; infodemic

The identification of a new strain of the Mpox virus (clade Ib) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the alarming rise in cases across Africa linked to sexual activity, and the potential for a new pandemic led the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on August 14, 2024 (https://www.paho.org/en/mpox). Between January 1 and September 15, 2024, a total of 6,201 cases and 32 deaths related to Mpox were confirmed in Africa, with the majority occurring in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Additionally, cases of Mpox clade Ib were reported in Europe and Asia in August 2024 (https://worldhealthorg.shinyapps.io/mpx_global).

This situation is further complicated not only by the virus’s potential spread but also by the resurgence of public health challenges previously observed during the COVID-19 pandemic, such as the surge of disinformation (deliberate falsehoods intended to deceive), misinformation (inaccurate information shared without harmful intent), and fake news (fabricated news presented as legitimate), all of which undermine the effectiveness of the public health response (11. Edinger A, Valdez D, Walsh-Buhi E, Trueblood JS, Lorenzo-Luaces L, Rutter LA, et al. Misinformation and Public Health Messaging in the Early Stages of the Mpox Outbreak: Mapping the Twitter Narrative With Deep Learning. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e43841. Available from: https://www.jmir.org/2023/1/e43841
https://www.jmir.org/2023/1/e43841...
).

Modern society generates a massive volume of information daily, often overwhelming individuals as they attempt to verify sources, assess the accuracy of information, and properly interpret disseminated content. This information overload can undermine the capacity to make informed decisions, a challenge further aggravated by the increasing spread of false information through media channels, which incites panic and stigmatization, and hampers disease control efforts, including compliance with preventive measures (22. Yan X, Li Z, Cao C, Huang L, Li Y, Meng X, et al. Characteristics, Influence, Prevention, and Control Measures of the Mpox Infodemic: Scoping Review of Infodemiology Studies. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e54874. Available from: https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e54874
https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e54874...
).

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the dissemination of misleading information regarding the origin, treatment, and prevention of the disease exacerbated fear and distrust, resulting in high-risk behaviors such as the rejection of preventive measures and vaccine hesitancy. A similar pattern is now emerging with Mpox. Myths about transmission, erroneously associated with LGBTQIAPN+ communities, doubts about vaccine efficacy, and conspiracy theories linking COVID-19 vaccination to the Mpox virus are rapidly circulating on social media (https://www.paho.org/pt/noticias/4-5-2023-opas-e-grindr-unem-esforcos-para-fornecer-informacoes-sobre-mpox-comunidades). However, while social media facilitates the spread of dubious information, it also plays a vital role in disseminating accurate scientific knowledge, which is crucial for mitigating the effects of the infodemic (33. Albrecht SS, Aronowitz S V., Buttenheim AM, Coles S, Dowd JB, Hale L, et al. Lessons Learned From Dear Pandemic , a Social Media–Based Science Communication Project Targeting the COVID-19 Infodemic. Public Health Rep. 2022;137(3):449–56. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00333549221076544
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
).

Misleading information about Mpox can have devastating consequences, undermining public trust in health authorities and leading segments of the population to ignore critical recommendations. Furthermore, it creates fertile ground for stigma and discrimination, particularly when the transmission of the disease is associated with sexual practices and wrongly linked to specific social groups (44. El Dine FB, Gebreal A, Samhouri D, Estifanos H, Kourampi I, Abdelrhem H, et al. Ethical considerations during Mpox Outbreak: a scoping review. BMC Med Ethics. 2024;25(1):79. Available from: https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-024-01078-0
https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/a...
). To tackle this new infodemic, it is crucial to apply lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. One effective approach has been the use of digital platforms for real-time monitoring of false information. Tools such as the WHO’s EPI-WIN (Information Network for Epidemics) (https://www.who.int/teams/epi-win) have been widely used to debunk myths and provide evidence-based information about COVID-19.

Partnerships between health authorities, universities, and social media platforms also played a crucial role in combating misinformation, disinformation, and fake news, with the rapid removal of misleading content, alerts about incorrect information, and the promotion of verified information on their interfaces. Additionally, media literacy campaigns and the mobilization of digital influencers were essential in amplifying preventive messages and helping the public identify reliable information sources (55. Powell J, Pring T. The impact of social media influencers on health outcomes: Systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2024;340:116472. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0277953623008298
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve...
).

To effectively combat Mpox, it is crucial for health authorities and public officials to urgently increase investments in strategies aimed at mitigating the spread of the disease. Empowering individuals with reliable scientific communication is essential for fostering adherence to preventive measures and ensuring a coordinated public health response.

Disclaimer.

Authors hold sole responsibility for the views expressed in the manuscript, which may not necessarily reflect the opinion or policy of the RPSP/PAJPH and/or the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO).

Acknowledgements.

P.R.M.F. is a research productivity fellow at the at National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brazil. F.W.C.A. and D.S.S. would also like to thank the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for the scholarship. There is no funding source for this study.

  • Funding.
    None.

REFERENCES

  • 1.
    Edinger A, Valdez D, Walsh-Buhi E, Trueblood JS, Lorenzo-Luaces L, Rutter LA, et al. Misinformation and Public Health Messaging in the Early Stages of the Mpox Outbreak: Mapping the Twitter Narrative With Deep Learning. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e43841. Available from: https://www.jmir.org/2023/1/e43841
    » https://www.jmir.org/2023/1/e43841
  • 2.
    Yan X, Li Z, Cao C, Huang L, Li Y, Meng X, et al. Characteristics, Influence, Prevention, and Control Measures of the Mpox Infodemic: Scoping Review of Infodemiology Studies. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e54874. Available from: https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e54874
    » https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e54874
  • 3.
    Albrecht SS, Aronowitz S V., Buttenheim AM, Coles S, Dowd JB, Hale L, et al. Lessons Learned From Dear Pandemic , a Social Media–Based Science Communication Project Targeting the COVID-19 Infodemic. Public Health Rep. 2022;137(3):449–56. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00333549221076544
    » http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00333549221076544
  • 4.
    El Dine FB, Gebreal A, Samhouri D, Estifanos H, Kourampi I, Abdelrhem H, et al. Ethical considerations during Mpox Outbreak: a scoping review. BMC Med Ethics. 2024;25(1):79. Available from: https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-024-01078-0
    » https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-024-01078-0
  • 5.
    Powell J, Pring T. The impact of social media influencers on health outcomes: Systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2024;340:116472. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0277953623008298
    » https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0277953623008298

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    01 Nov 2024
  • Date of issue
    2024

History

  • Received
    24 Sept 2024
  • Accepted
    24 Sept 2024
Organización Panamericana de la Salud Washington - Washington - United States
E-mail: contacto_rpsp@paho.org