In the article “Panorama of risky sexual behaviors in the Brazilian adult population – PNS 2019”, DOI https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056004007, published on the Revista de Saúde Pública.2022;56:61, on pages 1,4,5,6,7 and 8 the RSP corrects tables 1 and 2, results section and estimates reported in the abstract and discussion.
Where it reads:
It should read:
Where it reads:
It should read:
Where it reads:
Abstract (p. 1):
“The prevalence of nonuse of condoms among married/cohabiting partners was the same in both sexes (75%).”
“39.1%”; “26.9%.”
It should read:
Abstract (p. 1):
“The prevalence of nonuse of condoms among married/cohabiting partners was similar in both sexes (75.1% and 75.3%, among men and women)”
“34.1%”; “21.3%.”
Where it reads:
Results section:
(p. 4, last paragraph)
“75% (95%CI: 74.3–75.7)”;“26.9% (95%CI: 25.2–28.5)”; “39.1% (95%CI: 37.3–41.0)”
It should read:
Results section:
(p. 4, last paragraph)
“75.2% (95%CI: 74.5–75.9)”;“21.3% (95%CI: 19.6–23.0)”; “34.1% (95%CI: 32.2–36.1)”
Where it reads:
(p. 5, 1st paragraph)
“Regardless of marital status, nonuse of condoms was significantly higher among the older age groups and people with no schooling or with some elementary school.”
“(92.4%; 95%CI: 89.8–94.4)”; “(80.3%; 95%CI: 78.6–81.8)”; “(74.2%; 95%CI: 72.9–75.3)”
It should read:
(p. 5, 1st paragraph)
“Regardless of marital status, nonuse of condoms was significantly higher among the older age groups.”
“(92.5%; 95%CI: 90.1–94.4)”; “(80.4%; 95%CI: 78.8–82.0)”; “(74.4%; 95%CI: 73.3–75.6).”
Where it reads:
(p. 7, 1st paragraph)
“iv) people from the Northern region presenting nonuse of condom lower than people from other regions for both sexes and marital status.”
It should read:
(p. 7, 1st paragraph)
“iv) people from the Northern region married or cohabiting presenting nonuse of condom lower than people from other regions for both sexes.”
Where it reads:
(p. 7, 2nd paragraph)
“except for those referring to people aged 25 to 29 years and those living in households whose PCHI was above three MW (Table 1).”
It should read:
(p. 7, 2nd paragraph)
“except for those referring to people aged 25 to 29 years, aged 60 years or older and those living in households whose PCHI was above three MW (Table 1).”
Where it reads:
(p. 7, 3rd paragraph)
“We highlight, for example, the disparity observed among people aged between 30 and 39 years, an age group in which the prevalence of nonuse of condom among men was 22.6% (95%CI: 19.6–26.0), while among women it reached 39.6% (95%CI: 36.5–42.7). Among people with elementary school or some high school, the values reach 21.8% (95%CI: 18.3–25.7) and 39.4% (95%CI: 34.7–44.2), respectively.”
It should read:
(p. 7, 3rd paragraph)
“We highlight, for example, the disparity observed among people living in rural areas, in which the prevalence of nonuse of condom among men was 21.2% (95%CI: 18.3–24.5), while among women it reached 38.4% (95%CI: 33.0–44.0). Among people with no schooling or some elementary school, the values reach 26.8% (95%CI: 23.8–30.0) and 43.8% (95%CI: 39.8–48.0), respectively.”
Where it reads:
Discussion section:
(p. 8, last paragraph)
“(75%)”; “92.4%”
It should read:
Discussion section:
(p. 8, last paragraph)
“(75.2%)”; “92.5%”
Publication Dates
- Publication in this collection
06 Jan 2023 - Date of issue
2022
