ABSTRACT
We have previously reported the impact of covid-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening, in Brazil: among women aged 50–69 years, mammography attendance decreased by 42% in public healthcare (SUS), comparing 2019 and 2020. In this short communication, we wish to present: a) an update of the number of mammograms performed, in 2021; b) an exploratory analysis of the characteristics of the screened population between 2019 and 2021. A total of 1.675.307 mammograms were performed in 2021, nearly 15% lower than pre-pandemic levels. Almost a third, 29.5% of them, had intervals greater than three years. In accordance with our previous study, the number of patients with palpable lumps on physical exam increased. The consequences of postponing breast cancer screening during the pandemic are still uncertain. Unfortunately, as of December 2021, screening attendance has not resumed. On the contrary, our results show an increase in the fraction of women with mammography delayed beyond three years.
DESCRIPTORS:
Breast Neoplasms, prevention & control; Mammography, statistics & numerical data; Women’s Health, trends; COVID-19
We have previously reported the impact of the covid-19 pandemic on breast screening in Brazil11 Bessa JF. Breast imaging hindered during covid-19 pandemic, in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2021;55:8. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003375
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021... . Among the target population (women aged 50–69 years), mammography attendance decreased by 42% in public healthcare (SUS), comparing 2019 and 2020.
Since the covid-19 pandemic outbreak, reports on its impact on cancer care have skyrocketed. For instance, as of January 2022, PubMed has 563 articles with keywords “Covid” and “breast cancer”. Most studies found a negative association between lockdown restrictions and breast cancer care, including difficult access to healthcare22 Molen DRM, Bargon CA, Batenburg MCT, Stam LE, Dam IE, Baas IO, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perceived access to health care and preferences for health care provision in individuals (being) treated for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022(191(3):553-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06458-3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06458... , increased prescription of preoperative endocrine therapy33 Tonneson JE, Hoskin TL, Day CN, Durgan DM, Dilaveri CA, Boughey JC. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer stage at diagnosis, presentation, and patient management. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29:2231-9. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-11088-6
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-11088... , and even delayed surgery beyond 12 weeks44 COVIDSurg Collaborative. Effect of COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns on planned cancer surgery for 15 tumour types in 61 countries: an international, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(11):1507-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00493-9
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00... .
In this short communication, we wish to present: a) an update of the number of mammograms performed in the target screening population, in 2021; b) an exploratory analysis of the characteristics of the screened population between 2019 and 2021.
Just as for the first publication, we are interested in women aged 50–69 years and screened in public healthcare, according to data obtained from Sistema de Informação do Câncer (Siscan), a segment of Datasus, an open access database.
The results are presented in the Figure . A total of 1,675,307 mammograms were performed in 2021. This represents some recovery from 2020 (n = 1,190,577) but not to the extent seen in 2019 (n = 1,964,013). Therefore, 2021 attendance was still nearly 15% lower than pre-pandemic levels.
The partial recovery is probably a result of large-scale coronavirus vaccination campaigns and the subsequent contraction of the infection and mortality rates. Yet, it was not enough to increase the attendance to pre-pandemic levels. A reasonable sector of the population (especially those at higher risk for severe covid) possibly still has concerns about contracting covid. Also, screening units are adapted to reduce contamination, which means, among other measures, fewer patients scheduled by hour.
Table shows results stratified by year and subgroup. The proportion of patients with delayed exams sharply increased in 2021: almost a third of them had their last mammogram more than three years before. According to our previous paper, the number of patients with palpable lumps on physical exam increased. Finally, increased screening for elevated-risk patients was also a notable trend. Prioritizing such individuals (those with documented pathology of high-risk lesions, extremely dense breasts, personal history of thoracic radiation before 30 years old, strong familiar history for breast cancer and/or with deleterious pathogenic mutations) is a strategy to lessen the pandemic impact on cancer diagnosis, as most mammographic abnormal results are found in elevated-risk groups55 Chiarelli AM, Walker MJ, Espino-Hernandez G, Gray N, Salleh A, Adhihetty C, et al. Adherence to guidance for prioritizing higher risk groups for breast cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Ontario Breast Screening Program: a descriptive study. CMAJ Open. 2021;9(4):E1205-12. https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200285
https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200285... .
Once again, we highlight the positive impact of the “Pink October” campaign on breast cancer awareness that resulted in a spike on the number of mammograms performed at the end of 2021.
The consequences of postponing breast cancer screening during the pandemic are still uncertain. As long as these patients return to regular screening, the impact might be minimal, since screening every year or every two years yield similar efficacy in average-risk women aged 50–69 years66 Canelo-Aybar C, Posso M, Montero N, Solà I, Saz-Parkinson Z, Duffy SW, et al. Benefits and harms of annual, biennial, or triennial breast cancer mammography screening for women at average risk of breast cancer: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC). Br J Cancer. 2022;126(4):673-88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01521-8
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01521... . But, unfortunately, at least as of December 2021, we have not seen screening attendance resuming. On the contrary, our results show an increase in the fraction of women with mammography delayed beyond three years.
The covid-19 pandemic might represent a wonderful opportunity to review and adapt breast cancer screening in countries with limited resources, like Brazil. Many authors claim that the greatest priority for Brazil is a one-stop clinic, which patients with palpable lumps or abnormal mammogram results could easily reach for a fast diagnosis, in contrast to the currently fragmented slow-paced care77 Bretas G, Renna NL, Bines J. Practical considerations for expediting breast cancer treatment in Brazil. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2021;2:100028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2021.100028
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2021.1000... . We must prepare to provide excellent care for symptomatic patients if we want to also care for asymptomatic patients.
REFERENCES
- 1Bessa JF. Breast imaging hindered during covid-19 pandemic, in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2021;55:8. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003375
» https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003375 - 2Molen DRM, Bargon CA, Batenburg MCT, Stam LE, Dam IE, Baas IO, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perceived access to health care and preferences for health care provision in individuals (being) treated for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022(191(3):553-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06458-3
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06458-3 - 3Tonneson JE, Hoskin TL, Day CN, Durgan DM, Dilaveri CA, Boughey JC. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer stage at diagnosis, presentation, and patient management. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29:2231-9. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-11088-6
» https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-11088-6 - 4COVIDSurg Collaborative. Effect of COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns on planned cancer surgery for 15 tumour types in 61 countries: an international, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(11):1507-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00493-9
» https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00493-9 - 5Chiarelli AM, Walker MJ, Espino-Hernandez G, Gray N, Salleh A, Adhihetty C, et al. Adherence to guidance for prioritizing higher risk groups for breast cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Ontario Breast Screening Program: a descriptive study. CMAJ Open. 2021;9(4):E1205-12. https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200285
» https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200285 - 6Canelo-Aybar C, Posso M, Montero N, Solà I, Saz-Parkinson Z, Duffy SW, et al. Benefits and harms of annual, biennial, or triennial breast cancer mammography screening for women at average risk of breast cancer: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC). Br J Cancer. 2022;126(4):673-88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01521-8
» https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01521-8 - 7Bretas G, Renna NL, Bines J. Practical considerations for expediting breast cancer treatment in Brazil. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2021;2:100028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2021.100028
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2021.100028
Publication Dates
- Publication in this collection
17 Oct 2022 - Date of issue
2022
History
- Received
17 Jan 2022 - Accepted
19 May 2022