Recent changes in trends of mortality from cervical cancer in Southeastern Brazil

Carolina Terra de Moraes Luizaga Beatriz Cordeiro Jardim Victor Wünsch Filho José Eluf Neto Gulnar Azevedo e Silva About the authors

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the trends of cervical cancer mortality in Brazilian Southeastern states, and to compare them to Brazil and other regions between 1980 and 2020.

METHODS

Time series study based on data from the Sistema de Informações de Mortalidade (Brazilian Mortality Information System). Death data were corrected by proportional redistribution of deaths from ill-defined causes and cervical cancer of unspecified portion. Age-standardized and age-specific rates were calculated by screening target (25–39 years; 40–64 years) and non-target (65 years or older) age groups. Annual percentage changes (APC) were estimated by linear regression model with breakpoints. The coverage of Pap Smear exam in the Unified Health System (SUS) was evaluated between 2009 and 2020 according to age group and locality.

RESULTS

There were increases in corrected mortality rates both in 1980 and in 2020 in all regions, with most evident increments at the beginning of the series. There was a decrease in mortality nationwide between 1980–2020; however, the state of São Paulo showed a discrete upward trend in 2014–2020 (APC=1.237; 95%CI 0.046–2.443). Noteworthy is the trend increment in the 25–39 year-old group in all study localities, being sharper in the Southeast region in 2013–2020 (APC=5.072; 95%CI 3.971–6.185). Screening coverage rates were highest in São Paulo and lowest in Rio de Janeiro, with a consistent decline from 2012 onwards at all ages.

CONCLUSIONS

São Paulo is the first Brazilian state to show a reversal trend in mortality from cervical cancer. The changes in mortality patterns identified in this study point to the need for reorganization of the current screening program, which should be improved to ensure high coverage, quality, and adequate follow-up of all women with altered test results.

Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Mortality Registries; Spatio-Temporal Analysis; Time Series Studies; Brazil

INTRODUCTION

Cervical cancer is a disease necessarily caused by the persistent infection by high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types11. Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Muñoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2002 Apr;55(4):244-65. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.55.4.244
https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.55.4.244...
and, although potentially preventable, it remains a serious health issue in low- and middle-income countries22. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660...
. With large global variations in mortality rates, it is the leading cancer type related to death among women in 36 countries22. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660...
. In recent decades, significant reductions in mortality and incidence have occurred in countries that have implemented Pap Smear-based vaginal cytology33. Vaccarella S, Lortet-Tieulent J, Plummer M, Franceschi S, Bray F. Worldwide trends in cervical cancer incidence: impact of screening against changes in disease risk factors. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Oct;49(15):3262-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.0...
screening programs, with better results found in those with organized screening44. Melnikow J, Henderson JT, Burda BU, Senger CA, Durbin S, Weyrich MS. Screening for cervical cancer with high-risk human papillomavirus testing: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2018 Aug;320(7):687-705. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.10400
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.10400...
.

Adversely, some countries that have seen significant declines in morbidity and mortality from organized Pap Smear-based screening have started to witness smaller declines, stability or even increases in mortality from the disease55. Kok IM, Aa MA, van Ballegooijen M, Siesling S, Karim-Kos HE, Kemenade FJ, et al. Trends in cervical cancer in the Netherlands until 2007: has the bottom been reached? Int J Cancer. 2011 May;128(9):2174-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25553
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25553...
- 66. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e191-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30482-6
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30...
, which highlights the need for investments in more efficient strategies for organizing screening programs77. Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM, Tunesi S, Snijders PJ, Arbyn M, et al.; International HPV screening working group. Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials [Lancet. 2014 Feb;383(9916):524-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62218-7
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62...
- 88. Bhatla N, Nessa A, Oswal K, Vashist S, Sebastian P, Basu P. Program organization rather than choice of test determines success of cervical cancer screening: case studies from Bangladesh and India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Jan;152(1):40-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13486
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13486...
.

The first initiatives for early detection of cervical cancer in Brazil were isolated, within restricted populations and occurred in the late 1980s. It was only after 1998, with the development of a control program for this cancer by the Brazilian Ministry of Health (MoH), that cervical screening practices were structured on an opportunistic basis throughout the country. The current guidelines recommend the Pap Smear test for women aged 25–64 years99. Ministry of Health (BR). Diretrizes brasileiras para o rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero 2a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva, 2016. . To monitor screening tests and diagnostic confirmation in the Unified Health System (SUS), the MoH implemented information systems called SISCOLO ( Sistema de Informação do Câncer do Colo do Útero , Cervical Cancer Information System) and SISCAN ( Sistema de Informação do Câncer , Cancer Information System).

In the state of São Paulo, data available from the State Health Secretariat indicate a decline in the coverage of Pap Smear exams performed at SUS as of 20101010. Secretaria Estadual de Saúde (São Paulo). Matriz de Indicadores. Exames de citologia cérvico vaginal faturados/população feminina na faixa etária usuária do SUS; porcentagem média das 17 Divisões Regionais de Saúde (DRS) [cited August 1, 2021]. Retrieved from http://tabnet.saude.sp.gov.br/deftohtm.exe?tabnet/ind37b_matriz.def
http://tabnet.saude.sp.gov.br/deftohtm.e...
and problems in the follow-up of screened women1111. Ribeiro CM, Silva IS, Eluf Neto J, Cury LCPB, Silva GS. Follow-up of women screened for cervical cancer in São Paulo, Brazil: an analysis of the times to diagnostic investigation and treatment. Cancer Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;72:101940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2021.101940
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2021.101...
, which may impact the trend of decreasing mortality in the medium and long term. The objective of this study is to analyze the trends of cervical cancer mortality in Brazilian Southeastern states, and to compare them to Brazil and other regions between 1980 and 2020.

METHODS

Time-series study using data of deaths among women recorded in the Mortality Information System ( Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade , SIM) in the period 1980–2020. The data were obtained from the DATASUS1212. Ministry of Health (BR). Datasus. Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade – SIM. Transferência de arquivos. Brasilia, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2021 [cited on December 15, 2021]. Retrieved from: https://datasus.saude.gov.br/transferencia-de-arquivos/
https://datasus.saude.gov.br/transferenc...
website, with data for 2020 still preliminary. For 1980–1995 the ninth edition of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Death (ICD-9) was used, and between 1996–2020 the tenth edition (ICD-10) was used.

Populations for each locality were obtained from tabulations in DATASUS1313. Ministry of Health (BR). Datasus. Tabnet: demográficas e socioeconômicas: população residente. Brasilia, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2021 [cited on December 15, 2021]. Retrieved from: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftohtm.exe?popsvs/cnv/popbr.def
http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftoht...
according to: 1) 1980–2012 data from the Censuses (1980, 1991, 2000 and 2010), Count (1996) and Intercensal Projections (1981–2012); and, 2) 2013–2020 data from the Population Estimates Study.

Mortality data and populations were aggregated in 5-year intervals from 15 to 79 years old (0–14, 15–19, 20–24, 25–29, 30–34, 35–39, 40–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79 and 80 years or older) according to the Federation Unit for the Southeast, Brazil and Brazilian regions of residence. Deaths records without age information were proportionally distributed among the seven age groups according to the underlying cause of death, place of residence and year of death.

We corrected the information on the underlying cause of death applying the methodology proposed by Mathers et al.1414. Mathers CD, Bernard C, Iburg KM, Inoue M, Fat DM, Shibuya K, et al. Global burden of disease in 2002: data sources, methods and results. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003 [cited on November 22, 2019]. (GPE Discussion Paper, 54). Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/healthinfo/paper54.pdf
https://www.who.int/healthinfo/paper54.p...
(2003) and adapted by Girianelli et al.1515. Girianelli VR, Gamarra CJ, Silva GA. Os grandes contrastes da mortalidade por câncer do colo do útero e de mama no Brasil. Rev Saúde Pública. 2014;48(3):459-67. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005214
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.20140...
(2014), which consists on proportionally redistributing 50% of deaths with an ill-defined underlying cause (ICD-9 780-799; ICD-10 R00-R99). This correction is identified in this study as Correction 1.

For deaths registered as from cervical cancer (ICD-9 180; ICD-10 C53), an additional correction (Correction 2) was performed, with redistribution of deaths classified as malignant neoplasm of uterus, part unspecified (ICD-9 179; ICD-10 C55), maintaining the proportion registered as deaths from cervical and uterine body cancer1616. Gamarra CJ, Valente JG, Silva GA. Correção da magnitude da mortalidade por câncer do colo do útero no Brasil, 1996-2005. Rev Saúde Pública. 2010;44(4):629-38. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102010000400006
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910201000...
(ICD-9 182; ICD-10 C54). Corrections were applied proportionally to the registered deaths according to calendar year, place of residence and age group.

For each locality and calendar year in the period 1980–2020, age-standardized mortality rates were calculated, considering data without and with correction, using as standard the world population proposed by Segi1717. Segi M. Cancer mortality for selected sites in 24 countries (1950-57). Senda: Tohoku University School of Public Health; 1960. (1960). In addition to standardized rates, age-specific rates were calculated for ages 25–39, 40–64 and 65 years or older.

To estimate the general and specific mortality trend, a linear regression model was applied, according to the methodology used in a previously published study1818. Silva GA, Jardim BC, Ferreira VM, Junger WL, Girianelli VR. Mortalidade por câncer nas capitais e no interior do Brasil: uma análise de quatro décadas. Rev Saúde Pública. 2020;54:126. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002255
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020...
. Since these are time series with trends that vary over time in a non-regular manner, a linear model for the overall trend for the entire period would not be adequate. In order to consider the existence of structural breaks, the time variable was introduced into the model by means of piecewise linear splines that allowed the identification of inflection moments in the series. With this, models with different break points around the points identified with the splines were tested. The models were compared using Akaike’s criterion (AIC)1919. Welham SJ. Smoothing spline for longitudinal data. In: Fitzmaurice G, Davidian M, Verbeke G, Molenberghs G, editors. Longitudinal data analysis. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2008. p. 253-9. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420011579.ch11
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420011579.ch...
to define the points that offered the best fit to the model.

The residuals-based evaluation of the models was performed to verify if the usual assumptions were met, and to check for residual autocorrelation by autocorrelation functions (FAC) and partial autocorrelation (FACP). Models that showed significant autocorrelation or with an absolute value greater than 0.5 were re-estimated using generalized least squares with first-order autoregressive model AR (1), allowing the modeling of autocorrelation and correction of the variance from coefficient estimators. The function “gls” with restricted maximum likelihood estimation (REML) from the package “nlme”2020. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D. R Core Team. “nlme”: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-140. Vienna; 2019 [cited on November 22, 2019]. Retrieved from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme...
was used.

The coefficient of the term for each segment expresses the logarithm of the trend in that interval. Thus, the annual percent change (APC) of mortality rates was calculated by the formula, with respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) and p values. For the interpretation of trends, statistical non-significance (p-value above 0.05) was used as a criterion to characterize an APC as stable. The statistically significant PCA, when positive, indicated an increasing trend, and when negative, a decreasing trend.

The coverage of screening by cytopathological exam of the uterine cervix (Pap Smear) in women aged 25–39 years, 40–64 and 65 years or older in 2009–2020 was evaluated by the ratio between the total number of exams with codes 0203010019 (cervical-vaginal/microflora), and 0203010086 recorded in the SUS2121. Ministry of Health (BR). Sistema de Informações Ambulatoriais do SUS. Brasilia, DF: Ministério da Saúde, 2022 [cited on March 4, 2022]. Retrieved from: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftohtm.exe?sia/cnv/qbuf.def
http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftoht...
Outpatient Information System ( Sistema de Informações Ambulatoriais , SIA) and 1/3 of the female population1313. Ministry of Health (BR). Datasus. Tabnet: demográficas e socioeconômicas: população residente. Brasilia, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2021 [cited on December 15, 2021]. Retrieved from: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftohtm.exe?popsvs/cnv/popbr.def
http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftoht...
excluding the percentage of beneficiaries of health insurance plans, in each age group and locality, obtained from the Brazilian National Agency for Supplementary Health2222. Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar. Dados e Indicadores do Setor. Beneficiários de planos privados de saúde. Rio de Janeiro: ANS, 2022 [cited on March 4, 2022]. Retrieved from: https://www.ans.gov.br/perfil-do-setor/dados-e-indicadores-do-setor
https://www.ans.gov.br/perfil-do-setor/d...
. Dividing the population into 1/3 is justified by the recommendation that an exam be performed every three years2323. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Ficha técnica de indicadores das ações de controle do câncer do colo do útero. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2014 [cited on February 14, 2022]. Retrieved from https://www.inca.gov.br/sites/ufu.sti.inca.local/files/media/document/fichatecnicaindicadorescolo14.pdf
https://www.inca.gov.br/sites/ufu.sti.in...
.

All analyses were performed in the R Software, version 4.1.0.

RESULTS

In the Southeast region, between 1980 and 2020, there were 63,889 deaths from malignant neoplasm of the cervix (without correction), 665,231 deaths with an ill-defined or unknown underlying cause, and 41,006 deaths from malignant neoplasm of uterus, part unspecified. In Brazil, the respective numbers of deaths were 165,087, 2,178,355 and 83,748.

The correction with redistribution of deaths from an ill-defined or unknown underlying cause led to an increase of 15.38% in the rates for Brazil in 1980, ranging from 7.69% in the Southeast to 35.56% in the Northeast. The increase with this correction was smaller in 2020 (for Brazil 2.17%; 1.96% in the Midwest to 4.21% in the North). Adding to this correction the redistribution of deaths from cervical cancer in the unspecified portion, the rates in 1980 increased by 68.33% for Brazil (ranging from 36.36% in the Midwest to 98.18% in the South). By 2020, smaller increases occurred (for Brazil 19.15%; ranging from 12.12% in the North to 28.57% in the Southeast) (data not shown).

Comparing age-adjusted (with proportional redistribution of deaths from ill-defined causes and redistribution of deaths classified as uterine, SOE) and age-standardized mortality rates, the highest ones were in the North region and the lowest in the Southeast, with a ratio between these in 2020 of 2.47 ( Table 1 ).

Table 1
Cervical cancer mortalitya rates without and with correction. Brazil, regions and states in the Southeast region, 1980 and 2020.

In Brazil, a decrease in the magnitude of mortality rates was observed between 1980 and 2020 ( Table 2 ), a pattern similar to that observed in the Southeast region until 2014. According to the mortality trend analysis in the country, statistically significant declines from 1992–1998 (APC = -0.993; 95%CI -1.767– -0.212) were maintained until 2005–2014 (APC = -2.604; 95%CI -3.108 – -2.097), while in 2014–2020 the trend stabilized (APC = -0.205; 95%CI -1.131–0.730). Rio de Janeiro showed a similar pattern to Brazil, while Minas Gerais expressed a declining trend throughout the 1980–2020 period, despite stability in 1987–1993 and a more modest drop in 2011–2020 (APC = -1.516; 95%CI -2.290–0.735). In São Paulo, starting in 2014, a slight increase in the trend of mortality rates was observed (APC = 1.237; 95%CI 0.046–2.443) ( Table 2 ).

Table 2
Annual percentage change (APC) of mortality ratesa correctedb by cervical cancer. Brazil, Southeastern region and states of the Southeastern region, 1980 to 2020.

The temporal distribution of age-specific adjusted mortality rates shows that, in general, the Southeast region and the state of São Paulo had lower rates compared to the country. This divergence is particularly noticeable from the year 2000 onwards. Even though the lowest mortality rates were observed in the 25–39 age group, the increase in the risk of death in this age group is noteworthy in all spatial cuts examined ( Figure 1 ). The trend analysis showed that this increase was evident in the Southeast region in 2013–2020 (APC = 5.072; 95%CI 3.971–6.185) ( Table 3 ). Of less intensity and earlier, the increase in Brazil was detected in 2007–2020 (APC = 2.520; 95%CI 2.092–2.950) and in São Paulo in 2008–2020 (APC = 4.173; 95%CI 3.231–5.123). Minas Gerais stands out for the sharpest upward trend (2011–2020: APC = 6.739; 95%CI 3.611–9.962) ( Table 3 ).

Figure 1
Time trend of mortalitya rates correctedb by cervical cancer specific by age. Brazil, Southeastern region and State of São Paulo, 1980 to 2020.

aRates per 100,000 inhabitants; bRates corrected for ill-defined causes (ICD-9 780-799; ICD-10 R00-R99) and uterus, SOE (ICD-9 179; ICD-10 C55) presented graphically on a logarithmic scale (log 10).

Table 3
Annual percentage change (APC)a of mortality rates correctedb by cervical cancer specific by age. Brazil, Southeastern region and states of the Southeastern region, 1980 to 2020.

In the 40–64 age group, marked declines occurred in both Brazil and the Southeast region, as well as in São Paulo between the years 1990 and 2013, after which mortality rates remained decreasing in the country but became stable in the Southeast and São Paulo. In ages 65 years or older, it is worth noting the prominent decline in mortality in São Paulo in the 1999–2015 period (APC = -5.105; 95%CI -5.623 – -4.585), followed by stability in 2015–2020 (APC = -1.139; 95%CI -3.285–1.055) ( Table 3 ).

Regarding the performance of cervical cytopathological exam in the Southeast in 2009–2020, the highest coverage was observed in São Paulo and the lowest in Rio de Janeiro ( Figure 2 ). In all age groups, coverage remained higher until 2012, however, uneven. In the 25–39 age group, the average coverage for the 2009–2012 period remained above 80% for the Southeastern states, except in Rio de Janeiro (48%). In the 40–64 age group, the evolution of rates was similar to the previous age group. There was a consistent drop in coverage as of 2012 at all ages, worsening in 2020. In women 65 years or older (the age group outside of screening), lower coverage rates were seen with similar time evolution as the younger groups ( Figure 2 ).

Figure 2
Coveragea (%) by Pap Smear exams in women targeted for screening (25–39 and 40–64 years) and non-targeted (65 years and over) in SUS. Southeastern region and states, 2009 to 2020.

aRatio of cervical cytopathological exams to 1/3 of the female population using the SUS for each age group multiplied by 100. This indicator is considered a proxy for screening test coverage23.

DISCUSSION

The Brazilian scenario is compatible with the inverse correlation between the occurrence of cervical cancer and the level of socioeconomic development2424. Bray F, Jemal A, Grey N, Ferlay J, Forman D. Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008-2030): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Aug;13(8):790-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70211-5
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70...
. The highest mortality rates were observed in regions with lower socioeconomic status2525. Desenvolvimento humano nas macrorregiões brasileiras: 2016. Brasilia, DF: UNDP: IPEA: FJP, 2016 [cited on June 1, 2022]. Retrieved from: https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21ABoyugCIM9Yo35k&cid=124653557C0404EC&id= 124653557C0404EC%2123001&parId=124653557C0404EC %2122848&o=OneUp
https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AB...
and less access to health services, such as the North and Northeast regions2626. Barbosa IR, Souza DL, Bernal MM, Costa IC. Desigualdades regionais na mortalidade por câncer de colo de útero no Brasil: tendências e projeções até o ano 2030. Cien Saúde Colet. 2016 Jan;21(1):253-62. http://doi: 10.1590/1413-81232015211.03662015
http://doi:...
. In four decades there was a downward trend throughout the country, with the exception of the interior of the North region, which in 2017 showed rates three times higher than the Southeast, unveiling the extreme inequality in the risk of becoming ill and dying from this cancer1818. Silva GA, Jardim BC, Ferreira VM, Junger WL, Girianelli VR. Mortalidade por câncer nas capitais e no interior do Brasil: uma análise de quatro décadas. Rev Saúde Pública. 2020;54:126. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002255
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020...
.

Although the downward curves in mortality may be attributed to the greater health equity resulting from the implementation of the SUS in 19902727. Machado CV, Silva GA. Political struggles for a universal health system in Brazil: successes and limits in the reduction of inequalities. Global Health. 2019 Nov;15(S1 Suppl 1):77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0523-5
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0523-...
and, to some extent, to the opportunistic screening started in 1998, the speed of the decline in mortality was slower than that observed in other Latin American countries such as Chile2828. Claro IB, Lima LD, Almeida PF. Diretrizes, estratégias de prevenção e rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero: as experiências do Brasil e do Chile. Cien Saúde Colet. 2021 Oct;26(10):4497-509. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320212610.11352021
https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021261...
.

In the United States, the decline in incidence and mortality has also been observed with the implementation of cytological screening, but many racial and socioeconomic inequalities exist2929. Buskwofie A, David-West G, Clare CA. A review of cervical cancer: incidence and Disparities. J Natl Med Assoc. 2020 Apr;112(2):229-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2020.03.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2020.03.0...
. In the Latin American and Caribbean region and Asia, the incidence of cervical cancer is relatively high. Favorable trends in incidence have been observed in several countries; however, but preventive actions are inefficient and probably this decrease is related to other factors such as decreased fertility and birth rate, hygiene conditions, or improved socioeconomic status3030. Vaccarella S, Laversanne M, Ferlay J, Bray F. Cervical cancer in Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean and Asia: regional inequalities and changing trends. Int J Cancer. 2017 Nov;141(10):1997-2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30901
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30901...
. In Brazil, Chile, and Colombia, positive outlook for cervical cancer is related to better structured screening programs and relatively higher coverage rates than other Latin American countries3131. Pilleron S, Cabasag CJ, Ferlay J, Bray F, Luciani S, Almonte M, et al. Cervical cancer burden in Latin America and the Caribbean: where are we? Int J Cancer. 2020 Sep;147(6):1638-48. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32956
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32956...
, although the impact of these programs is limited by inequalities in access to diagnostic and treatment services and suboptimal coverage and follow-up rates3232. Sierra MS, Soerjomataram I, Antoni S, Laversanne M, Piñeros M, Vries E, et al. Cancer patterns and trends in Central and South America. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016 Sep;44 Suppl 1:S23-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2016.07.013
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2016.07....
.

In this study, the trend of increasing cervical cancer mortality among women aged 25–39 years in Brazil was very pronounced in the Southeastern states, especially Minas Gerais and Sao Paulo. This phenomenon has been seen in other countries recently3333. Bray F, Lortet-Tieulent J, Znaor A, Brotons M, Poljak M, Arbyn M. Patterns and trends in human papillomavirus-related diseases in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Vaccine. 2013 Dec;31 Suppl 7:H32-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.02.071
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.0...
. In São Paulo, the increase observed in the 25–39 age group (also observed in Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro), stability in the 40–64 age group (also seen in Espírito Santo and Rio de Janeiro), and the only one to show stability in ages 65 years or older are noteworthy. This finding points out that São Paulo is the first Brazilian state to show a reversal trend in mortality from cervical cancer.

The increased incidence and mortality among younger women has been attributed to changes in sexual behavior that increase the risk of persistent HPV infection3333. Bray F, Lortet-Tieulent J, Znaor A, Brotons M, Poljak M, Arbyn M. Patterns and trends in human papillomavirus-related diseases in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Vaccine. 2013 Dec;31 Suppl 7:H32-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.02.071
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.0...
. Despite the finding that there it is a cancer in decline in several countries, recent trends of increasing incidence among young women, more marked in high-income countries, have been observed3434. He WQ, Li C. Recent global burden of cervical cancer incidence and mortality, predictors, and temporal trends. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Dec;163(3):583-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.075
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10....
, 3535. Huang J, Deng Y, Boakye D, Tin MS, Lok V, Zhang L, et al. Global distribution, risk factors, and recent trends for cervical cancer: A worldwide country-level analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jan;164(1):85-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.11.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.11....
. For birth cohorts from 1940 or 1950 onwards an increase in incidence was observed in European countries and Japan, while the incidence remained stable in the United States33. Vaccarella S, Lortet-Tieulent J, Plummer M, Franceschi S, Bray F. Worldwide trends in cervical cancer incidence: impact of screening against changes in disease risk factors. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Oct;49(15):3262-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.0...
. The same has been described in Central Europe, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia3333. Bray F, Lortet-Tieulent J, Znaor A, Brotons M, Poljak M, Arbyn M. Patterns and trends in human papillomavirus-related diseases in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Vaccine. 2013 Dec;31 Suppl 7:H32-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.02.071
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.0...
. This increase has raised debate around the need to review and implement more effective screening strategies.

At younger ages, cancer mortality rates are lower than those at older ages, and are therefore more prone to fluctuations due to fewer deaths. In this study, the trend of increasing mortality among young women was verified through positive and statistically significant annual percentage changes. For this reason, we consider it relevant to show this situation that has been reported in other countries. In Brazil, this finding demands attention to the screening coverage indicators in this specific age group, as well as to indicators of access to diagnosis and treatment, since fewer cervical cancer deaths are expected at these age groups. Knowing the prevalence of HPV infection over time and whether the disease has affected these women earlier would bring important contributions to the direction of specific actions at all levels of healthcare.

The self-reported coverage of Pap Smear for all women in the target age group was 78.8% in the country3636. Theme Filha MM, Leal MD, Oliveira EF, Esteves-Pereira AP, Gama SG. Regional and social inequalities in the performance of Pap test and screening mammography and their correlation with lifestyle: brazilian national health survey, 2013. Int J Equity Health. 2016 Nov;15(1):136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0430-9
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0430-...
and 80% in the capital cities3737. Oliveira MM, Andrade SS, Oliveira PP, Silva GA, Silva MM, Malta DC. Pap-test coverage in women aged 25 to 64 years old, according to the National Health Survey and the Surveillance System for Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey, 2013. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;21:e180014. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720180014
https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-54972018001...
, proportions that may be considered high. Since these are based on self-reported information from women interviewed in population surveys, they may not reflect the actual screening coverage. At the same time, the incidence and mortality rates for cervical cancer remain high compared to other countries22. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660...
, with great disparity between regions3838. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Estimativa 2020: incidência de câncer no Brasil. Instituto Nacional de Câncer. José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2019. . In this aspect, it is worth noting that the actual coverage is certainly lower than those reported in population surveys.

Lower coverages are observed from the SUS databases - SISCOLO, SISCAN, and SIA. Recently, a drop was identified in the number of women who performed cytopathological exam for the first time in SISCOLO, reaching 41% between the years 2012 and 20133939. Dias MB, Alcântara LL, Girianelli VR, Migowski A, Ribeiro CM, Tomazelli J. Rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero em mulheres de 25 a 64 anos: indicadores do primeiro exame citopatológico informado no Siscolo, 2007-2013. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2022;68(1):e-111520. https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2022v68n1.1520
https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2...
. Moreover, the availability of exams for diagnostic confirmation in SUS is deficient, which impairs following-up of screened women4040. Ribeiro CM, Dias MB, Pla MA, Correa FM, Russomano FB, Tomazelli JG. Parâmetros para a programação de procedimentos da linha de cuidado do câncer do colo do útero no Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2019 Jul;35(6):e00183118. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00183118
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x0018311...
.

In the Southeast, especially in São Paulo, SUS screening coverage tends to be higher compared to other states in the country. In 2009–2020, declines in the percentages of screening test coverage were observed in all states and age groups, indicating that access to the exam in the SUS has been reduced. The lowest level of coverage occurred in 2020, which can be explained by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Vale et al.4141. Vale DB, Menin TL, Bragança JF, Teixeira JC, Cavalcante LA, Zeferino LC. Estimating the public health impact of a national guideline on cervical cancer screening: an audit study of a program in Campinas, Brazil. BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov;19(1):1492. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7846-2
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7846-...
found a significant reduction in the proportion of exams performed outside the screening target age group in Campinas, a municipality located in the state of São Paulo, between 2010 and 2016, especially in women under 25 years old. According to the authors, the better alignment of local practices with national guidelines could explain the declines observed in coverage rates in recent years. In addition to a reduction in the excess of exams, Vale et al.4141. Vale DB, Menin TL, Bragança JF, Teixeira JC, Cavalcante LA, Zeferino LC. Estimating the public health impact of a national guideline on cervical cancer screening: an audit study of a program in Campinas, Brazil. BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov;19(1):1492. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7846-2
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7846-...
found increases in the proportions of exams performed among women aged 25 and 64 years, a fact not observed in this study. The data presented for the Southeast region showed that the reductions observed since 2009 in the group aged 65 and over were also verified in the age group of 25–64 years. This fact suggests there are other factors related to the decline in screening coverage in the Southeast region, in addition to those pointed out in the Campinas study4141. Vale DB, Menin TL, Bragança JF, Teixeira JC, Cavalcante LA, Zeferino LC. Estimating the public health impact of a national guideline on cervical cancer screening: an audit study of a program in Campinas, Brazil. BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov;19(1):1492. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7846-2
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7846-...
.

In addition to the decrease in coverage, there are problems in the follow-up of the abnormal results. A study based on linkage of data from SISCAN, SIA, and Hospital Admissions System ( Sistema de Internações Hospitalares, SIH) reviewed the quality of follow-up of screened women in the state of São Paulo and found that for 35.2% of women with abnormal cytology, there were no data found on the diagnosis in the information systems1111. Ribeiro CM, Silva IS, Eluf Neto J, Cury LCPB, Silva GS. Follow-up of women screened for cervical cancer in São Paulo, Brazil: an analysis of the times to diagnostic investigation and treatment. Cancer Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;72:101940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2021.101940
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2021.101...
. It also identified a median time greater than six months between the altered test and diagnosis and almost three months between diagnosis and the beginning of treatment. These prolonged times were associated with worse conditions of care in the regional healthcare units of the state. Reinforcing these findings, another study also conducted in São Paulo concluded that access to colposcopy is limited in the state, impairing diagnosis and consequently treatment4242. Buss LF, Cury L, Ribeiro CM, Silva GA, Eluf Neto J. Access to colposcopy in the State of São Paulo, Brazil: probabilistic linkage study of administrative data. Cad Saude Publica. 2022 Jan;38(1):e00304820. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00304820
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x0030482...
.

Delays in diagnosis lead to diagnosis in more advanced stages. In this sense, screening actions for cervical cancer play an important role, not only in reducing the incidence of the disease, but also in reducing mortality by providing early diagnosis.

A study conducted in Brazil, based on data from hospital-based cancer registries, showed that the diagnosis of cervical cancer occurred late (stages III-IV), in 53.5% of cases in 20124343. Renna Junior NL, Silva GA. Tendências temporais e fatores associados ao diagnóstico em estágio avançado de câncer do colo uterino: análise dos dados dos registros hospitalares de câncer no Brasil, 2000-2012. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2018;27(2):e2017285. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742018000200003
https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-4974201800...
. In São Paulo, hospital data on invasive cervical tumors4444. Fundação Oncocentro de São Paulo; Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo. Download de bancos de dados de acesso público. São Paulo; 2022 [cited in February 2022]. Retrieved from: http://www.fosp.saude.sp.gov.br/fosp/diretoria-adjunta-de-informacao-e-epidemiologia/rhc-registro-hospitalar-de-cancer/banco-de-dados-do-rhc/
http://www.fosp.saude.sp.gov.br/fosp/dir...
diagnosed in 2017 pointed out that 39.2% of cases in women aged 25–39 years were diagnosed in stages III-IV. In the age groups 40–64 and 65 years or older, the respective proportions were 51.7% and 62.3%. These data suggest a worrisome scenario, considering that the national cervical cancer control program has been implemented nationwide since the late 1990s. Improvements in the early detection of this cancer would have an important effect in reducing mortality in the country.

The discovery of the causal role of HPV11. Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Muñoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2002 Apr;55(4):244-65. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.55.4.244
https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.55.4.244...
entails the need to reformulate primary and secondary prevention of cervical cancer66. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e191-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30482-6
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30...
. The introduction of HPV testing can optimize and make screening more effective, especially in low-income countries4545. Franceschi S, Vaccarella S. Beral’s 1974 paper: a step towards universal prevention of cervical cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;39(6):1152-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2015.10.019
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2015.10....
. Data from large randomized studies have shown that protection against invasive carcinoma with screening based on HPV testing from 30 years of age and at 5-year intervals is 60–70% higher compared to oncotic cytology77. Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM, Tunesi S, Snijders PJ, Arbyn M, et al.; International HPV screening working group. Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials [Lancet. 2014 Feb;383(9916):524-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62218-7
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62...
.

There are issues that deserve investigation in order to make decisions about strategic and cost-effective measures that should be implemented in cervical cancer control programs. Some of these are the definition of screening intervals, ways to motivate women to adhere, and the organization of services from access to screening to improved infrastructure for diagnosis and treatment4646. Gupta R, Gupta S, Mehrotra R, Sodhani P. Cervical cancer screening in resource-constrained countries: current status and future directions. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017 Jun;18(6):1461-7. https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.6.1461
https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.6...
. Even with the availability of the HPV test as a recommended screening test, challenges inherent to the organization of the program will continue to exist. More than the screening test, the use of the most appropriate approach to organize all components, including quality aspects, are determining factors for the success of a screening program88. Bhatla N, Nessa A, Oswal K, Vashist S, Sebastian P, Basu P. Program organization rather than choice of test determines success of cervical cancer screening: case studies from Bangladesh and India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Jan;152(1):40-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13486
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13486...
.

Analyses of trends of mortality from cervical cancer are often impaired by inaccuracies when filling in the underlying cause of death, since a portion is registered as malignant neoplasm of uterus, part unspecified, which does not allow knowledge of the true anatomical origin of the tumor (cervix or body of the uterus). To deal with this limitation, a technique was employed to correct the deaths from cervical cancer originally recorded in the SIM, allowing more realistic analyses. It should be highlighted that in 2020 the correction for ill-defined causes was low in all regions (ranged from 1.96% in the Midwest to 4.21% in the North). However, the redistribution by uterus part unspecified led to an increase of 28.57% in the Southeast region, a higher percentage if compared to the other regions.

After significant progress in the accuracy of death information in the 1980–2020 period and decades of decline in mortality from cervical cancer, recent trends of stability in Brazil and increase in the state of São Paulo point to the need for reorganizing the current screening program to achieve improvements in coverage and quality in all its stages - screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Immunization against HPV will bring positive results in the long term, but its implementation does not minimize the role of secondary prevention; rather, it reinforces the immediate need for planning for implementation in the medium term of a more cost-effective and sensitive screening test.

An organized screening program will make it possible to actively reach women in the target age group, and especially women 25–39 years old, in which a sharp increase in mortality from cervical cancer has been observed in the country. These are women in full sexual activity and also clearly integrated into the economically active population and, thus, with greater difficulties in adhering to screening.

Only with a broad approach including high coverage, quality of examinations, and follow-up throughout the cancer care pathway, will greater reductions not only in mortality, but also in incidence be achieved. This will ensure Brazil’s alignment with the global strategy of eliminating cervical cancer as a public health issue4747. World Health Organization (WHO). Global strategy to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem. Geneva: WHO; 2020. .

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Muñoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2002 Apr;55(4):244-65. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.55.4.244
    » https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.55.4.244
  • 2
    Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
    » https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
  • 3
    Vaccarella S, Lortet-Tieulent J, Plummer M, Franceschi S, Bray F. Worldwide trends in cervical cancer incidence: impact of screening against changes in disease risk factors. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Oct;49(15):3262-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.024
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.024
  • 4
    Melnikow J, Henderson JT, Burda BU, Senger CA, Durbin S, Weyrich MS. Screening for cervical cancer with high-risk human papillomavirus testing: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2018 Aug;320(7):687-705. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.10400
    » https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.10400
  • 5
    Kok IM, Aa MA, van Ballegooijen M, Siesling S, Karim-Kos HE, Kemenade FJ, et al. Trends in cervical cancer in the Netherlands until 2007: has the bottom been reached? Int J Cancer. 2011 May;128(9):2174-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25553
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25553
  • 6
    Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e191-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30482-6
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30482-6
  • 7
    Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM, Tunesi S, Snijders PJ, Arbyn M, et al.; International HPV screening working group. Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials [Lancet. 2014 Feb;383(9916):524-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62218-7
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62218-7
  • 8
    Bhatla N, Nessa A, Oswal K, Vashist S, Sebastian P, Basu P. Program organization rather than choice of test determines success of cervical cancer screening: case studies from Bangladesh and India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Jan;152(1):40-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13486
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13486
  • 9
    Ministry of Health (BR). Diretrizes brasileiras para o rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero 2a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva, 2016.
  • 10
    Secretaria Estadual de Saúde (São Paulo). Matriz de Indicadores. Exames de citologia cérvico vaginal faturados/população feminina na faixa etária usuária do SUS; porcentagem média das 17 Divisões Regionais de Saúde (DRS) [cited August 1, 2021]. Retrieved from http://tabnet.saude.sp.gov.br/deftohtm.exe?tabnet/ind37b_matriz.def
    » http://tabnet.saude.sp.gov.br/deftohtm.exe?tabnet/ind37b_matriz.def
  • 11
    Ribeiro CM, Silva IS, Eluf Neto J, Cury LCPB, Silva GS. Follow-up of women screened for cervical cancer in São Paulo, Brazil: an analysis of the times to diagnostic investigation and treatment. Cancer Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;72:101940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2021.101940
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2021.101940
  • 12
    Ministry of Health (BR). Datasus. Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade – SIM. Transferência de arquivos. Brasilia, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2021 [cited on December 15, 2021]. Retrieved from: https://datasus.saude.gov.br/transferencia-de-arquivos/
    » https://datasus.saude.gov.br/transferencia-de-arquivos/
  • 13
    Ministry of Health (BR). Datasus. Tabnet: demográficas e socioeconômicas: população residente. Brasilia, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2021 [cited on December 15, 2021]. Retrieved from: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftohtm.exe?popsvs/cnv/popbr.def
    » http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftohtm.exe?popsvs/cnv/popbr.def
  • 14
    Mathers CD, Bernard C, Iburg KM, Inoue M, Fat DM, Shibuya K, et al. Global burden of disease in 2002: data sources, methods and results. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003 [cited on November 22, 2019]. (GPE Discussion Paper, 54). Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/healthinfo/paper54.pdf
    » https://www.who.int/healthinfo/paper54.pdf
  • 15
    Girianelli VR, Gamarra CJ, Silva GA. Os grandes contrastes da mortalidade por câncer do colo do útero e de mama no Brasil. Rev Saúde Pública. 2014;48(3):459-67. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005214
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005214
  • 16
    Gamarra CJ, Valente JG, Silva GA. Correção da magnitude da mortalidade por câncer do colo do útero no Brasil, 1996-2005. Rev Saúde Pública. 2010;44(4):629-38. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102010000400006
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102010000400006
  • 17
    Segi M. Cancer mortality for selected sites in 24 countries (1950-57). Senda: Tohoku University School of Public Health; 1960.
  • 18
    Silva GA, Jardim BC, Ferreira VM, Junger WL, Girianelli VR. Mortalidade por câncer nas capitais e no interior do Brasil: uma análise de quatro décadas. Rev Saúde Pública. 2020;54:126. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002255
    » https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002255
  • 19
    Welham SJ. Smoothing spline for longitudinal data. In: Fitzmaurice G, Davidian M, Verbeke G, Molenberghs G, editors. Longitudinal data analysis. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2008. p. 253-9. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420011579.ch11
    » https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420011579.ch11
  • 20
    Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D. R Core Team. “nlme”: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-140. Vienna; 2019 [cited on November 22, 2019]. Retrieved from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
    » https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
  • 21
    Ministry of Health (BR). Sistema de Informações Ambulatoriais do SUS. Brasilia, DF: Ministério da Saúde, 2022 [cited on March 4, 2022]. Retrieved from: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftohtm.exe?sia/cnv/qbuf.def
    » http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftohtm.exe?sia/cnv/qbuf.def
  • 22
    Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar. Dados e Indicadores do Setor. Beneficiários de planos privados de saúde. Rio de Janeiro: ANS, 2022 [cited on March 4, 2022]. Retrieved from: https://www.ans.gov.br/perfil-do-setor/dados-e-indicadores-do-setor
    » https://www.ans.gov.br/perfil-do-setor/dados-e-indicadores-do-setor
  • 23
    Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Ficha técnica de indicadores das ações de controle do câncer do colo do útero. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2014 [cited on February 14, 2022]. Retrieved from https://www.inca.gov.br/sites/ufu.sti.inca.local/files/media/document/fichatecnicaindicadorescolo14.pdf
    » https://www.inca.gov.br/sites/ufu.sti.inca.local/files/media/document/fichatecnicaindicadorescolo14.pdf
  • 24
    Bray F, Jemal A, Grey N, Ferlay J, Forman D. Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008-2030): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Aug;13(8):790-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70211-5
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70211-5
  • 25
    Desenvolvimento humano nas macrorregiões brasileiras: 2016. Brasilia, DF: UNDP: IPEA: FJP, 2016 [cited on June 1, 2022]. Retrieved from: https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21ABoyugCIM9Yo35k&cid=124653557C0404EC&id= 124653557C0404EC%2123001&parId=124653557C0404EC %2122848&o=OneUp
    » https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21ABoyugCIM9Yo35k&cid=124653557C0404EC&id=
  • 26
    Barbosa IR, Souza DL, Bernal MM, Costa IC. Desigualdades regionais na mortalidade por câncer de colo de útero no Brasil: tendências e projeções até o ano 2030. Cien Saúde Colet. 2016 Jan;21(1):253-62. http://doi: 10.1590/1413-81232015211.03662015
    » http://doi:
  • 27
    Machado CV, Silva GA. Political struggles for a universal health system in Brazil: successes and limits in the reduction of inequalities. Global Health. 2019 Nov;15(S1 Suppl 1):77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0523-5
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0523-5
  • 28
    Claro IB, Lima LD, Almeida PF. Diretrizes, estratégias de prevenção e rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero: as experiências do Brasil e do Chile. Cien Saúde Colet. 2021 Oct;26(10):4497-509. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320212610.11352021
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320212610.11352021
  • 29
    Buskwofie A, David-West G, Clare CA. A review of cervical cancer: incidence and Disparities. J Natl Med Assoc. 2020 Apr;112(2):229-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2020.03.002
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2020.03.002
  • 30
    Vaccarella S, Laversanne M, Ferlay J, Bray F. Cervical cancer in Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean and Asia: regional inequalities and changing trends. Int J Cancer. 2017 Nov;141(10):1997-2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30901
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30901
  • 31
    Pilleron S, Cabasag CJ, Ferlay J, Bray F, Luciani S, Almonte M, et al. Cervical cancer burden in Latin America and the Caribbean: where are we? Int J Cancer. 2020 Sep;147(6):1638-48. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32956
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32956
  • 32
    Sierra MS, Soerjomataram I, Antoni S, Laversanne M, Piñeros M, Vries E, et al. Cancer patterns and trends in Central and South America. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016 Sep;44 Suppl 1:S23-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2016.07.013
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2016.07.013
  • 33
    Bray F, Lortet-Tieulent J, Znaor A, Brotons M, Poljak M, Arbyn M. Patterns and trends in human papillomavirus-related diseases in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Vaccine. 2013 Dec;31 Suppl 7:H32-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.02.071
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.02.071
  • 34
    He WQ, Li C. Recent global burden of cervical cancer incidence and mortality, predictors, and temporal trends. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Dec;163(3):583-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.075
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.075
  • 35
    Huang J, Deng Y, Boakye D, Tin MS, Lok V, Zhang L, et al. Global distribution, risk factors, and recent trends for cervical cancer: A worldwide country-level analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jan;164(1):85-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.11.005
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.11.005
  • 36
    Theme Filha MM, Leal MD, Oliveira EF, Esteves-Pereira AP, Gama SG. Regional and social inequalities in the performance of Pap test and screening mammography and their correlation with lifestyle: brazilian national health survey, 2013. Int J Equity Health. 2016 Nov;15(1):136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0430-9
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0430-9
  • 37
    Oliveira MM, Andrade SS, Oliveira PP, Silva GA, Silva MM, Malta DC. Pap-test coverage in women aged 25 to 64 years old, according to the National Health Survey and the Surveillance System for Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey, 2013. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;21:e180014. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720180014
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720180014
  • 38
    Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Estimativa 2020: incidência de câncer no Brasil. Instituto Nacional de Câncer. José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2019.
  • 39
    Dias MB, Alcântara LL, Girianelli VR, Migowski A, Ribeiro CM, Tomazelli J. Rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero em mulheres de 25 a 64 anos: indicadores do primeiro exame citopatológico informado no Siscolo, 2007-2013. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2022;68(1):e-111520. https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2022v68n1.1520
    » https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2022v68n1.1520
  • 40
    Ribeiro CM, Dias MB, Pla MA, Correa FM, Russomano FB, Tomazelli JG. Parâmetros para a programação de procedimentos da linha de cuidado do câncer do colo do útero no Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2019 Jul;35(6):e00183118. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00183118
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00183118
  • 41
    Vale DB, Menin TL, Bragança JF, Teixeira JC, Cavalcante LA, Zeferino LC. Estimating the public health impact of a national guideline on cervical cancer screening: an audit study of a program in Campinas, Brazil. BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov;19(1):1492. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7846-2
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7846-2
  • 42
    Buss LF, Cury L, Ribeiro CM, Silva GA, Eluf Neto J. Access to colposcopy in the State of São Paulo, Brazil: probabilistic linkage study of administrative data. Cad Saude Publica. 2022 Jan;38(1):e00304820. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00304820
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00304820
  • 43
    Renna Junior NL, Silva GA. Tendências temporais e fatores associados ao diagnóstico em estágio avançado de câncer do colo uterino: análise dos dados dos registros hospitalares de câncer no Brasil, 2000-2012. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2018;27(2):e2017285. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742018000200003
    » https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742018000200003
  • 44
    Fundação Oncocentro de São Paulo; Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo. Download de bancos de dados de acesso público. São Paulo; 2022 [cited in February 2022]. Retrieved from: http://www.fosp.saude.sp.gov.br/fosp/diretoria-adjunta-de-informacao-e-epidemiologia/rhc-registro-hospitalar-de-cancer/banco-de-dados-do-rhc/
    » http://www.fosp.saude.sp.gov.br/fosp/diretoria-adjunta-de-informacao-e-epidemiologia/rhc-registro-hospitalar-de-cancer/banco-de-dados-do-rhc/
  • 45
    Franceschi S, Vaccarella S. Beral’s 1974 paper: a step towards universal prevention of cervical cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;39(6):1152-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2015.10.019
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2015.10.019
  • 46
    Gupta R, Gupta S, Mehrotra R, Sodhani P. Cervical cancer screening in resource-constrained countries: current status and future directions. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017 Jun;18(6):1461-7. https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.6.1461
    » https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.6.1461
  • 47
    World Health Organization (WHO). Global strategy to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem. Geneva: WHO; 2020.

  • Funding: Auxílio para Centros de Ciência para o Desenvolvimento, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Fapesp - Processo nº 2021/11794-4).

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    17 Apr 2023
  • Date of issue
    2023

History

  • Received
    18 Mar 2022
  • Accepted
    8 July 2022
Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revsp@org.usp.br