Cambridge Cognitive Examination: desempenho de idosos brasileiros saudáveis com baixa escolaridade
Irene de Freitas Henriques MoreiraI; Roberto Alves LourençoI, II; Claudia SoaresIII; Eliasz EngelhardtIV; Jerson LaksI, II, VIPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências Médicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
IIFaculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
IIINúcleo de Estudos em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
IVInstituto de Neurologia Deolindo Couto, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
VInstituto de Psiquiatria, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
This study aimed to estimate the quartile distribution on the cognitive assessment of normal elderly with low education as measured by the Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG). A sample of 292 elderly (> 65 years of age), screened for dementia and depression, were assessed using the CAMCOG. The CAMCOG scores of normal subjects (n = 206) were stratified according to age (65-69, 70-74, 75-79, > 80) and schooling (illiterate, 1-4, and > 5 years of formal education). Mean age was 72.8 (± 3.5) and mean schooling was 3.5 years (± 3). The mean score on the CAMCOG was 71 (± 12.7). The scores at the first quartile for illiterate/1-4 years of schooling were 58/62 (65-69 years), 52/63 (70-74 years), 48/67 (75-79 years) and 46/64 (> 80 years), respectively. There was a significant difference in the CAMCOG quartiles according to education and age. This study provides normative data on the CAMCOG of elderly people with low educational levels which may be clinically useful.
Cognition; Mental Health; Aged
Este estudo objetivou estimar a distribuição em quartis do Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) de idosos normais com baixa escolaridade. Foram selecionados 292 idosos (> 65 anos) que fizeram avaliação para detectar demência ou depressão (DSM-IV). Os resultados do CAMCOG dos indivíduos normais (n = 206) foram estratificados por idade (65-69, 70-74, 75-79 e > 80) e escolaridade (sem escolaridade, 1-4 anos e > 5 anos de estudo formal). A média de idade foi 72,8 anos (± 3,5), a de escolaridade 3,5 (± 3) anos e a pontuação do CAMCOG foi 71 (± 12,7). Os escores do quartil inferior do CAMCOG de analfabetos/1-4 anos de estudo foram 58/62 (65-69 anos), 52/63 (70-74 anos), 48/67 (75-79 anos) e 46/64 (> 80 anos), respectivamente. Verificou-se diferença significativa no desempenho dos quartis do CAMCOG quanto à escolaridade e relação inversamente proporcional com a idade. Este estudo oferece dados normativos do CAMCOG para idosos brasileiros com baixa escolaridade que podem ser úteis no contexto clínico.
Cognição; Saúde Mental; Idosos
The increasing prevalence of age-associated chronic degenerative illnesses is a major outcome of the progressive aging of the world population. Among these diseases, dementia is one of the most important 1. Epidemiological studies, both in developed and in developing countries, have shown that the prevalence of dementia doubles every five years after the age of 65, ranging from 3% among 70-year-old subjects to 20%-30% among the elderly older than 85 2,3. Brazil already has a total of 14 million people over 60, of which 37% are illiterate or have less than one year of formal education 4. In this country, Herrera et al. 5 found a 7.1% prevalence of dementia which was higher among women, increased with age, and presented an inverse correlation with education. It should be noted that only 3.5% of the cases had 8 or more years of formal education, whereas 12.2% were illiterate.
Early detection of cognitive decline in the elderly is relevant, as this may precede progression to Alzheimer's disease. Sensitive neuropsychological tests could identify pre-clinical cognitive deficits and characterize the cognitive profile of a subgroup with poor memory 6. Many factors seem to interfere with cognitive performance, such as age, personal income, gender, socio-cultural level, intelligence quotients, and jobs. However, educational background plays a key role in this assessment, its influence on the cognitive scores being a matter of debate and constant research 7,8,9,10,11,12,13.
The Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly (CAMDEX) 14,15 is a standardized structured interview and examination for diagnosing common mental disorders in later life, with special reference to the dementias. It has been validated for use in several languages 16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23. There is also a validated version in Portuguese 22,23. The Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG - section B of the CAMDEX) evaluates a broad range of cognitive functions and it has been applied by many studies as a sensitive measure to detect early stages of dementia in elderly with more than nine years of education 24,25,26. Two British studies have evaluated the CAMCOG normative values. In the first study, the variables "advanced age", female gender, low schooling, and low social class have been associated with low performance 24. The other study examined 1,914 community-dwelling elderly. Given the fact that no subjects attained the maximum score, the authors suggested that the CAMCOG is not an easy test even for those without a diagnosed mental disease. This might be an indication that the test has "no ceiling effect" 26. Research on the prevalence of dementia in India established 52 as the cutoff score on the CAMCOG for illiterates with an 88% specificity and a 98% sensitivity to identify cases. As for educated subjects, a cutoff score of 72 was able to achieve 90% specificity and 94% sensitivity 21. Also, a Greek study described the performance on the CAMCOG of elderly aged over 70, who had less than 6 years of education, but were not illiterate. They found a 90% sensitivity with scores 56/57 and 90% specificity with scores 43/44 to detect dementia 27.
All cognitive tests show some problems when used to assess individuals with a low level of education. There are few validated instruments to evaluate the Brazilian elderly with less than nine years of education and this is a cause of complication for the assessment of cognitive profiles, from both a clinical and epidemiological perspective. Normative data for age ranges and schooling could help the clinician identify normal and cognitively-impaired individuals. In Brazil, only the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) 28 has been studied regarding normative scores according to age and education 11,12,29,30,31.
The aim of this study is to assess the distribution in quartiles of the CAMCOG scores in normal elderly subjects who are illiterate or have less than five years of formal education.
The subjects were consecutively included (n = 292) in this cross-sectional study. Subjects who declared, or were observed during examination to have a severe hearing or sight impairment, or motor alterations that could interfere with the performance in the tests, were not included in this study. Also, subjects with any mental or neurological illness (a neurological examination was performed besides a complete anamnesis) were excluded from the research, as were those elderly whose native language was not Portuguese. The present study aimed to analyze only data on normal subjects from the total sample. Patients with dementia or depression (86 subjects) were excluded. A group with more than five years of formal education was also included in order to compare their cognitive performance with that of the illiterate/low education group.
The procedures for this inclusion and exclusion in the study are detailed below.
The CAMCOG is a structured interview for the diagnosis of neuropsychiatric disorders in the elderly and takes about 30 minutes to be applied. It is designed to detect cognitive deficits which comply with the operational criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition (DSM-IIIR), consisting of 60 items in 11 subscales. The cutoff score which discriminates normal from dementia cases in subjects with more than 5 years of education is 79-80. A Brazilian version was used for the present study 22,23.
Two items from the original CAMCOG were omitted in the assessment of the sample (object tactile recognition and recognition of two people in the room). The ability to recognize two people (item 185) was taken from the Blessed Dementia Scale 32, an abbreviated version of which is included in the CAMCOG. The item was originally intended for use in a clinical setting where the ability of recognize doctors, nurses, etc. could be tested. Since this test was usually inappropriate for the study situation, the authors' suggestion was to remove the item 24,33. Tactile recognition (item 175) has been removed from the newer version of the CAMDEX, CAMDEX-R, maintaining the cutoff points for recognition of cognitive impairment 15. This has reduced the total CAMCOG score by three points, i.e., to a maximum score of 104.
This study was carried out at a public health outpatient unit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from April to June, 2002. Elderly individuals aged 65 or more who came to the unit were invited to participate in the study, and those who agreed to take part signed the informed consent form prior to any research procedure. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the State University of Rio de Janeiro.
The subjects were evaluated in order to detect cognitive impairment and/or depression, in three steps. Firstly, a socio-demographic questionnaire, the Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADL) 34 and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) 35 were used to evaluate functional capacity. Then, two neuropsychologists applied the CAMCOG. Finally, two geriatricians trained to diagnose mental diseases interviewed the subjects to look for disorders according to the DSM-IV 36 criteria.
A Portuguese version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I) 36 was used to diagnose mood disorders, whereas the diagnosis of dementia syndrome was performed by a consensus meeting which discussed the clinical symptoms, the results of the neuropsychological assessment, and the results of the ADL and IADL scales.
The socio-demographic data were expressed as means and standard deviation (SD) and the CAMCOG scores were expressed both as a mean and standard deviation and as quartiles.
Quartiles on the CAMCOG were compared according to age ranges (65-69, 70-74, 75-79 and > 80), years of education (illiterate, 1-4 years and 5 or more years of formal education), and personal income expressed in the Brazilian currency (R$).
The chi-square test was used to assess the relation of the independent variables with the CAMCOG quartiles and the Kruskall-Wallis test was used to evaluate the relation of the CAMCOG quartiles with mean schooling, age, and personal income. Stratified analyses were performed to assess the inter-relation of the CAMCOG quartiles and the mean income controlled for education range. The accepted statistical significance was 0.05. The statistical package used for analysis was the SPSS 11.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA).
Among the 206 subjects without dementia and depression, the mean age was 72.8 (± 3.5), the mean duration of education was 3.5 (± 3), and the mean income was R$ 366.07 (± 335.46). The mean score on the CAMCOG was 71 (± 12.7). The variables which had a relation with the CAMCOG quartiles were age, income and schooling. Gender, however, did not present a significant relationship with the performance on the CAMCOG.
Table 3 shows the performance on the CAMCOG distributed in quartiles according to education and age ranges.
Table 4 depicts the direct relation among the CAMCOG quartiles, education, personal income, and the inverse relation with age.
The CAMCOG is a highly used test in clinical and epidemiological studies 22 being considered a sensitive measure to detect dementia at early stages 14,25,33,37,38. However, few studies have attempted so far to identify cutoff scores which could establish cognitive impairment in elderly samples with less than 4 years of education. Taking into consideration the cutoff score of 79/80 on the CAMCOG, as suggested by the original authors 14, approximately 50% in our sample would be classified as cognitively impaired. The first and last quartile scores were 38/62 and 82/96, with a mean education of 1.96 and 5.98 years, respectively. Age showed an inverse relationship with the CAMCOG scores. The sample with more than 5 years of education, on the other hand, showed a performance compatible with the ones depicted in the literature regarding samples with more than 9 years of education from developed countries. The first and last quartiles showed scores of 89 and 93 points, respectively 26.
The stratification of the CAMCOG quartiles by age and education may contribute to the follow-up of subjects with no cognitive and functional problems. Indeed, it has been shown that tests of cognitive abilities may predict the development of dementia in normal subjects a decade before the clinical outcome, better than and independently of genetic tests 39. According to this line of reasoning, the observation of the migration to lower quartiles in the CAMCOG scores along a given period of time might then provide valuable information, rather than just the ascertaining of a cutoff score in a cross-sectional cognitive screening. As shown in Table 3, educational level had a marked effect on the total score in all age ranges, a fact that must be taken into consideration whenever a patient is examined.
Some limitations of the present report must be acknowledged. The subjects were considered to be normal after a clinical examination, without complementary exams. However, other clinical problems could exert some influence on the cognitive performance. The lack of follow-up of the sample precludes the generalization of these findings to detect dementia longitudinally. Also, the small number of elderly above 80 renders our data as insufficient for comparing the clinical performance of subjects in this age range. Life expectancy in Brazil is currently around 72, a fact that may partially explain the scarcity of subjects aged over 80 in our sample.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to study the cognitive performance of normal low educational elderly using the CAMCOG with a special focus on illiterate subjects. The data presented herein might aid the evaluation of patients in Portuguese speaking countries, and in Brazil in particular, and may also support the design of other trans-cultural studies.
I. F. H. Moreira organized the database and participated in the writing of the manuscript. R. A. Lourenço provided the initial database and participated in the writing of the manuscript. C. Soares performed the statistical analyses and participated in the writing of the method section of the manuscript. E. Engelhardt revised the text and added issues in the discussion section of the manuscript. J. Laks designed the study and participated in the writing of the manuscript.
1. Nitrini R. Epidemiologia da doença de Alzheimer. In: Forlenza OV, Caramelli P, organizadores. Neuropsiquiatria geriátrica. São Paulo: Editora Atheneu; 2000. p. 23-33.
2. Hoffman A, Rocca WA, Brayne C. The prevalence of dementia in Europe: a collaborative study of 1980-1990 findings. Int J Epidemiol 1991; 20:736-48.
3. Lopes MA, Bottino CMC. Prevalência de demência em diversas regiões do mundo, análise dos estudos epidemiológicos de 1994 a 2000. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2002; 60:60-9.
4. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Perfil dos idosos responsáveis pelos domicílios. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/perfilidoso (accessed on 26/Nov/2005).
5. Herrera Jr. E, Caramelli P, Silveira AS, Nitrini R. Epidemiologic survey of dementia in a community-dwelling Brazilian population. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2002; 16:103-8.
6. Jager CA, Milwain E, Budge M. Early detection of isolated memory deficits in the elderly: the need for more sensitive neuropsychological tests. Psychol Med 2002; 32:483-91.
7. Ardila A, Rosselli M, Rosas P. Neuropsychological assessment in illiterates: visuospatial and memories abilities. Brain Cogn 1989; 11:147-66.
8. Ostrosky-Solis F, Ardila A, Rosselli M, Lopez-Arango G, Uriel-Mendoza V. Neuropsychological test performance in illiterate subjects. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1998; 13:645-60.
9. Rosselli D, Ardila A, Pradilla L, Mortillo I, Bautista L, Rey O, et al. El examen mental abreviado (Mini Mental State Examination) como prueba de selección para el diagnóstico de demencia: estudio poblacional colombiano. Rev Neurol 2000; 30:428-32.
10. Rosselli D, Ardila A, Rosas P. Neuropsychological assessment in illiterates: language and praxis abilities. Brain Cogn 1990; 12:281-96.
11. Laks J, Batista EMR, Guilherme ERL, Contino ALB, Faria MEV, Figueira I, et al. Mini-Mental State Examination norms in a community-dwelling simple of elderly with low schooling in Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública 2007; 23:315-9.
12. Lourenço RA, Veras RP. Mini-Exame do Estado Mental: características psicométricas em idosos ambulatoriais. Rev Saúde Pública 2006; 40:712-9.
13. Nitrini R, Caramelli P, Herrera Júnior E, Porto CS, Charchat-Fichman H, Carthery MT, et al. Performance of illiterate and literate nondemented elderly subjects in two testes of long-term memory. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2004; 10:634-8.
14. Roth M, Tym BK, Mountjoy CQ, Huppert FA, Hendrie H, Verma S, et al. CAMDEX: a standardised instrument for the diagnosis of mental disorder in the elderly with special reference to the early detection of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 1986; 149:698-709.
15. Roth M, Huppert FA, Mountjoy CQ, Tym E. The Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorder of the Elderly - revised. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
16. Vilalta J, Llinas J, Lopez-Pousa S, Amiel J, Vidal C. The Cambridge Mental Disorders of the Elderly examination. Validation of the Spanish adaptation. Neurologia 1999; 5:117-20.
17. Derix MM, Hofstede AB, Teunisse S, Hijdra A, Walstra GJ, Weinstein HC, et al. CAMDEX-N: the Dutch version of the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly with automatic data processing. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 1991; 22:143-50.
18. Neri M, Roth M, Mountjoy CQ, Andermacher E, Rubichi S, Spano A, et al. Validation of the full and short forms of the CAMDEX interview for diagnosing dementia. Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly. Dementia 1994; 5:257-65.
19. Andersen K, Lolk A, Nielsen H, Andersen J, Olsen C, Kragh-Sorensen P. Prevalence of very mild to severe dementia in Denmark. Acta Neurol Scand 1997; 96:82-7.
20. Greifenhagen A, Kurz A, Wiseman M, Haupt M, Zimmer R. Cognitive assessment in Alzheimer's disease: What does the CAMCOG assess? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1994; 9:743-50.
21. Shaji S, Promodu K, Abraham T, Roy KJ, Verghese A. An epidemiological study of dementia in a rural community in Kerala, India. Br J Psychiatry 1996; 168:745-9.
22. Bottino CMC, Stope AJR, Scalco AZ, Ferreira RCR, Hototian SR, Scalco MZ Validade e confiabilidade da versão brasileira do CAMDEX. Arq Neuropsi-quiatr 2001; 59 Suppl 3:20.
23. Bottino CMC, Almeida OP, Tamai S, Forlenza OV, Scalco MZ, Carvalho IAMC. CAMDEX The Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly. Projeto terceira Idade (PROTER). São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo; 1999.
24. Huppert FA, Brayne C, Gill C, Paykel ES, Beardsall L. CAMCOG - a concise neuropsychological test to assist dementia diagnosis: socio-demographic determinants in elderly population sample. Br J Clin Psychol 1995; 34:529-41.
25. Huppert FA, Jorm A, Brayne C, Girling D, Barkley C, Beardsall L, et al. Psychometric properties of the CAMCOG and its efficacy in the diagnosis of dementia. Aging Neuropsychol Cognition 1996; 3:201-14.
26. Williams JG, Huppert FA, Matthews FE, Nickson J; The MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Study. Performance and normative values of a concise neuropsychological test (CAMCOG) in an elderly population. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2003; 18:631-44.
27. Fountoulakis KN, Tsolakis M, Mohsc RC, Kazis A. Epidemiological dementia index: a screening instrument for Alzheimer's disease and other types of dementia suitable for use in populations with low education level. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 1998; 9:329-38.
28. Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-Mental State: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12:189-98.
29. Bertolucci PH, Brucki SM, Campacci SR, Juliano Y. O Mini-Exame do Estado Mental em uma população geral: impacto da escolaridade. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 1994; 52:1-7.
30. Almeida OP. Mini exame do estado mental e o diagnóstico de demência no Brasil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 1998; 56:605-12.
31. Brucki SMD, Nitrini R, Caramelli P, Bertolucci PH, Okamoto IH. Sugestões para o uso do Mini-Exame do Estado Mental no Brasil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2003; 61:777-81.
32. Blessed G, Tomlinson BE, Roth M. The association between quantitative measures of dementia and senile change in the cerebral grey matter of elderly subjects. Br J Psychiatry 1968; 114:797-811.
33. Lindeboom J, ter Horst R, Hooyer M, Dinkgreve M, Jonker C. Some psychometric properties of the CAMCOG. Psychol Med 1993; 23:213-9.
34. Katz S, Ford AB, Moscowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL. A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963; 185:914-9.
35. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969; 9:179-86.
36. American Psychiatric Association. Manual de diagnóstico e estatística de distúrbios mentais (DSM-IV). Porto Alegre: Editora Artes Médicas; 1995.
37. Johnston B, Scott N, Li Wan Po A, Jack DB. Psychometric profiling of the elderly using the Cambridge Cognitive Examination. Ann Pharmacother 1995; 29:982-7.
38. Cullum S, Huppert FA, McGee M, Dening T, Ahmed A, Paykel ES, et al. Decline across different domains of cognitive function in normal ageing: results of a longitudinal population - based study using CAMCOG. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000; 15:853-62.
39. Cervilla J, Prince M, Joels S, Lovestone S, Mann A. Premorbid cognitive test predicts the onset of dementia and Alzheimer's disease better than and independently of APOE genotype. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75:1100-6.
I. F. H. Moreira
Programa de Pós-graduação
em Ciências Médicas
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Rua Barão de Itambi 54, apto. 202
Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22231-000, Brasil
Final version resubmitted on 16/May/2008
Approved on 20/May/2008