Abstract
The aim of the present study was to estimate the prevalence of added sugar intake within the maximum limit of 5% of the total energy of the diet and test associations with demographic/socioeconomic characteristics, health-related behaviors and nutritional status in adolescents. A population-based, cross-sectional study was conducted with two-stage cluster sampling. The amount of free sugar in the diet was estimated using a 24-hour dietary recall. Among the 924 adolescents evaluated, only 20.1% (95% CI: 16.8-23.9) met the recommendation of not exceeding 5% of total calories with added sugar. Higher prevalence rates of adherence to the recommendation were found among males (22.0%), adolescents aged 15 to 19 years (24.3%), those born outside the state of São Paulo (30.4%), those with less screen time (27.5%), those with a lower number of household appliances (0-7: 29.5%; 8-15: 20.3%) and those with higher diet quality scores (2nd tertile: 17.7%; 3rd tertile: 37.2%). The findings demonstrate factors associated with added sugar intake from an epidemiological perspective, revealing the simultaneity of inappropriate behaviors, that is, the adolescents who consume more sugar also have longer screen time and worse overall diet quality.
Key words
Sugar; Food consumption; Adolescent; Health surveys
Introduction
The World Health Organization (WHO) previously recommended that the intake of added sugar be limited to a maximum of 10% of the total energy value of one’s diet, but reduced this figure to 5% in 201511 World Health Organization (WHO). Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children. Geneva: WHO; 2015.. Added sugar is that extracted from foods and subsequently incorporated into meals and processed food products, such as cookies, soft drinks and sweets22 Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2002.. The sugars most often added to foods and food products are sucrose (table sugar) and high-fructose corn syrup, the latter of which is produced by the enzymatic isomerization of glucose into fracture and revolutionized the industry of sweeteners and soft drinks33 Bray GA. Energy and Fructose From Beverages Sweetened With Sugar or High-Fructose Corn Syrup Pose a Health Risk for Some People. Adv Nutr 2013; 4(2):220-225..
In Brazil, a tendency toward a reduction in the purchasing of table sugar occurred between 1987 and 2009, but a significant increase occurred in the acquisition of highly processed foods, which are energy dense as well as high in sugar, sodium and both total and saturated fat44 Martins APB, Levy RB, Claro RM, Moubarac JC, Monteiro CA. Participação crescente de produtos ultraprocessados na dieta brasileira (1987-2009). Rev Saude Publica 2013; 47(4):656-665.. In a 16-year period from 1987 to 2003, the Brazilian diet came to have more sugar from highly processed foods (from 17.4% to 35.5%), with increases in the contribution of soft drinks (200%) and cookies (100%) to the total intake of free sugar55 Levy RB, Claro RM, Bandoni DH, Mondini L, Monteiro CA. Disponibilidade de "açúcares de adição" no Brasil: distribuição, fontes alimentares e tendência temporal. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2012; 15(1):3-12.. In the USA, nearly 90% of added sugar comes from highly processed foods, the three main sources of which are soft drinks (17.1%), sweetened juices (13.9%) and cookies, cakes and pies (11.2%), with table sugar accounting for 8.7% of added sugars in the American diet66 Steele EM, Baraldi LG, Louzada MLC, Moubarac JC, Mozaffarian D, Monteiro CA. Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the US diet: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2016; 6(3):e009892..
In the human organism, sugar is converted into energy through reactions that can lead to the depletion of vitamins, such as thiamine, niacin and riboflavin, which are necessary for the oxidation of glucose77 DiNicolantonio JJ, Berger A. Added sugars drive nutrient and energy deficit in obesity: a new paradigm. Open Heart 2016; 3(2):e000469.. A high sugar intake favors the development of health problems, such as nutritional deficiency77 DiNicolantonio JJ, Berger A. Added sugars drive nutrient and energy deficit in obesity: a new paradigm. Open Heart 2016; 3(2):e000469., dental caries11 World Health Organization (WHO). Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children. Geneva: WHO; 2015., weight gain11 World Health Organization (WHO). Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children. Geneva: WHO; 2015.,88 Bray GA, Popkin BM. Calorie-sweetened beverages and fructose: what have we learned 10 years later. Pediatr Obes 2013; 8(4):242-248.,99 Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Després JP, Hu FB. Sugar Sweetened Beverages, Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease risk. Circulation 2010; 121(11):1356-1364., arterial hypertension88 Bray GA, Popkin BM. Calorie-sweetened beverages and fructose: what have we learned 10 years later. Pediatr Obes 2013; 8(4):242-248.,1010 Malik AH, Akram Y, Shetty S, Malik SS, Njike VY. Impact of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages on Blood Pressure. Am J Cardiol 2014; 113(9):1574-1580., type 2 diabetes88 Bray GA, Popkin BM. Calorie-sweetened beverages and fructose: what have we learned 10 years later. Pediatr Obes 2013; 8(4):242-248.,99 Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Després JP, Hu FB. Sugar Sweetened Beverages, Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease risk. Circulation 2010; 121(11):1356-1364.,1111 Micha R, Peñalvo JL, Cudhea F, Imamura F, Rehm CD, Mozaffarian D. Association Between Dietary Factors and Mortality From Heart Disease, Stroke, and Type 2 Diabetes in the United States. JAMA 2017; 317(9):912-924., cardiovascular disease88 Bray GA, Popkin BM. Calorie-sweetened beverages and fructose: what have we learned 10 years later. Pediatr Obes 2013; 8(4):242-248.
9 Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Després JP, Hu FB. Sugar Sweetened Beverages, Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease risk. Circulation 2010; 121(11):1356-1364.
10 Malik AH, Akram Y, Shetty S, Malik SS, Njike VY. Impact of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages on Blood Pressure. Am J Cardiol 2014; 113(9):1574-1580.-1111 Micha R, Peñalvo JL, Cudhea F, Imamura F, Rehm CD, Mozaffarian D. Association Between Dietary Factors and Mortality From Heart Disease, Stroke, and Type 2 Diabetes in the United States. JAMA 2017; 317(9):912-924., metabolic syndrome88 Bray GA, Popkin BM. Calorie-sweetened beverages and fructose: what have we learned 10 years later. Pediatr Obes 2013; 8(4):242-248. and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease88 Bray GA, Popkin BM. Calorie-sweetened beverages and fructose: what have we learned 10 years later. Pediatr Obes 2013; 8(4):242-248.,1212 Nseir W, Nassar F, Assy N. Soft drinks consumption and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(21):2579-2588.. Researchers have found that, independently of metabolic syndrome, the consumption of soft drinks increases the occurrence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease for reasons related to the metabolism of fructose; moreover, the use of aspartame and caramel dye promotes insulin resistance and inflammation1212 Nseir W, Nassar F, Assy N. Soft drinks consumption and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(21):2579-2588..
Public health measures directed at the reduction in the amount of sugar in the diet are required to contain the epidemic of chronic non-communicable diseases, but face resistance in the form of the political and economic influence exerted by the food industry and producing countries1313 Kearns CE, Glantz SA, Schmidt LA. Sugar Industry Influence on the Scientific Agenda of the National Institute of Dental Research's 1971 National Caries Program: A Historical Analysis of Internal Documents. PLoS Med 2015; 12(3):e1001798.,1414 Kearney J. Food consumption trends and drivers. Phil Trans R Soc B 2010; 365(1554):2793-2807.. In Brazil, the Ministry of Health and Brazilian Association of Food Industries (ABIA) are discussing setting gradual voluntary goals to diminish the sugar content in processed foods and similar accords are being established for the reduction in sodium1515 Instituto Brasileiro de Defesa do Consumidor (Idec). Redução de sódio em alimentos: uma análise dos acordos voluntários no Brasil. São Paulo: Idec; 2014. Cadernos Idec-Série Alimentos. Volume 1.. The Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian population, published in 2014, was a measure of considerable importance to the promotion of healthy eating and the protection of food culture in Brazil. This guide organizes foods based on the extent and purpose of industrial processing, recommending the moderate use of sugar as a cooking ingredient for foods, such as home-made fruit-based sweets, and warning the population to avoid the intake of sugar from highly processed products1616 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde (MS). Guia Alimentar para a População Brasileira. Brasília: MS; 2014..
Considering the increase in the consumption of foods rich in sugar and its association with the development of chronic diseases, it is important to evaluate the diet of adolescents in an attempt to prevent current and future harm to health. Thus, the aim of the present study was to estimate the prevalence of added sugar intake and its association with demographic/socioeconomic variables, health-related behaviors and body mass index in adolescents aged 10 to 19 years residing in the city of Campinas, state of São Paulo, Brazil.
Methods
Study population and sampling process
A population-based, cross-sectional study was conducted using data from a health survey performed between 2008 and 2009 in the city of Campinas (hereafter referred to as the ISACamp survey) with community-dwelling individuals residing in urban areas of the city. The sample was selected using a probabilistic two-stage cluster sampling procedure. In the first stage, 50 census sectors were selected with probability proportional to size given by the number of homes in the sector. In the second stage, the systematic selection of homes was performed based on the list of addresses in the selected sectors. The list was updated in the field.
The calculation of the number of individuals needed to compose the sample was based on a 50% prevalence rate (corresponding to the maximum variability for the frequency of the events studied), 95% confidence level, 4% and 5% sampling error and a design effect of 2, totaling 1000 individuals in each age group: adolescents (10 to 19 years), adults (20 to 59 years) and seniors (60 years or older). Considering an 80% response rate, the sample size was increased to 1250. To obtain the desired sample size in each domain, 2150, 700 and 3900 homes were selected independently for interviews with adolescents, adults and seniors, respectively. Further details on the sampling process can be found in a study by Alves1717 Alves MCGP. ISA-Campinas 2008/09: plano de amostragem. [acessado 2017 Abr 10]. Disponível em: http://www.fcm.unicamp.br/fcm/sites/default/files/plano_de_amostragem.pdf
http://www.fcm.unicamp.br/fcm/sites/defa... . The present investigation involved the analysis of data from male and female adolescents who completed the 24-hour dietary recall (24HR).
Data collection and variables analyzed
Trained, supervised interviewers collected the data using a questionnaire organized in blocks of topics that was tested in a pilot study. The section on eating habits included the 24HR, which was administered throughout the course of one year on different days of the week and with the support of a photo album for dietary surveys. Training of the interviewers for the use of the 24HR was performed by a nutritionist who monitored the quality of the data collected and counseled the team in cases of possible flaws in filling out the 24HR. The at-home interviews were held with all residents in the age group selected for that household.
The dependent variable was added sugar intake not surpassing a maximum of 5% of the total energy intake of one’s diet. Sugar intake was estimated from the 24HR.
The 24HR was quantified for the transformation of the amounts of foods and meals reported in the home recipes into grams or milliliters. For such, information available on home measure tables1818 Fisberg RM, Villar BS. Manual de receitas e medidas caseiras para cálculo de inquéritos alimentares. São Paulo: Editora Signus; 2002.,1919 Pinheiro ABV, Lacerda EMA, Benzecry EH, Gomes MCS, Costa VM. Tabela para avaliação de consumo alimentar em medidas caseiras. São Paulo: Editora Atheneu; 2004., food labels and customer service publications was used. The dietary calculation of ingested foods was performed using the Nutrition Data System for Research, version 2007 (NCC Food and Nutrient Database, University of Minnesota, USA).
The following were the independent variables:
Demographic and socioeconomic variables: sex, age group (in years), place of birth, schooling of head of household (in years of study), household income per capita (using the Brazilian monthly minimum wage as reference), number of home appliances (refrigerator, freezer, washing machine, air conditioner, vacuum cleaner, etc.), private health insurance (yes or no) and whether the participant attended school.
Health-related behaviors: smoking, consumption of alcoholic beverages, screen time (television and computer in hours/day), practice of physical activity during recreation (active: adolescents aged 10 to 17 years who practiced at least 60 minutes of physical activity per day at least five days a week and adolescents 18 to 19 years who practiced at least 150 minutes weekly distributed among at least three days)2020 World Health Organization (WHO). Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: WHO; 2010.; Score on the Brazilian Healthy Eating Index-Revised (BHEI-R)2121 Previdelli AN, Andrade SC, Pires MM, Ferreira SRG, Fisberg RM, Marchioni DM. Índice de Qualidade da Dieta Revisado para população brasileira. Rev Saude Publica 2011; 45(4):794-798., categorized in distribution tertiles. The BHEI-R has been adapted and validated for the Brazilian population and has 12 components: nine related to food groups (total fruits; whole fruits; total vegetables; dark-green/orange vegetables and legumes; total cereals; whole-grain cereals; milk and milk byproducts; meat, eggs and legumes; and oils), two related to nutrients (sodium and saturated fat) and one assessing the percentage of energy from saturated and trans fats, alcohol and added sugar. The components receive scores ranging from zero (minimum) to 5, 10 or 20 (maximum), depending on the component and the intake level of the food items. The total BHEI-R score corresponds to the sum of the 12 components and ranges from zero (worse) to 100 points (best diet quality)2121 Previdelli AN, Andrade SC, Pires MM, Ferreira SRG, Fisberg RM, Marchioni DM. Índice de Qualidade da Dieta Revisado para população brasileira. Rev Saude Publica 2011; 45(4):794-798..
Body mass index (BMI): calculated from reported measures of weight and height. For the classification of the nutritional status of the adolescents, the cutoff points of BMI for age recommended by the WHO were used: BMI < 3rd percentile = underweight; ≥ 3rd and ≤ 85th percentile = ideal range; > 85th and ≤ 97th percentile = overweight; and > 97th percentile = obese2222 Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Siyam A, Nishida C, Siekmann J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ 2007; 85(9):660-667..
Data analysis
The prevalence rates of added sugar intake not exceeding 5% of the total energy intake of the diet were estimated. Associations with the independent variables were determined using the Rao-Scott test with a 5% level of significance. Crude and adjusted (sex and age) prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Variables with a p-value < 0.20 on the association test were incorporated into the Poisson multiple regression model, which was developed in two steps. Demographic/socioeconomic variables were incorporated in the first step and those with a p-value < 0.05 remained in the model. Health-related behaviors and BMI were incorporated in the second step and those with a p-value < 0.05 remained in the model. Both steps were adjusted by total dietary energy intake (kcal)2323 Willett WC, Howe GR, Kushi LH. Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr 1997; 65(4 Supl.):1220S-1228S.. The interviews were digitized in a databank developed in Epidata 3.1 (Epidata Assoc., Odense, Denmark) and the statistical analysis were performed with the aid of the Stata 11.0 program (Stata Corp., College Station, USA), using the svy module, which enables the incorporation of complex sampling weights in the survey.
Ethical aspects
This study received approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the State University of Campinas and the Brazilian National Research Ethics Committee. Adult participants signed a statement of informed consent. For participants less than 18 years of age, a legal guardian signed the statement of informed consent.
Results
Among the 929 adolescents identified in the selected homes, five declined to provide information for the 24-hour dietary recall. Thus, the information from 924 individuals aged 10 to 19 years was analyzed. Mean age was 14.1 years (95% CI: 13.9 to 14.4 years).
The sample had similar proportions of boys (51.0%) and girls. The 10-to-14-year-old age group accounted for the largest portion of the sample (54.9%). Individuals born in the city of Campinas (75.8%), segments with a lower family income (63.3%) and lower schooling of the head of the household (75.3%) and those who studied at public schools (65.7%) accounted for the majority of the sample. Moreover, 79.0% were not physically active during recreational activities, 78.2% had a longer screen time (> 3 hours/day) and 73.6% were either underweight or within the ideal range (Table 1).
Distribution of sample according to demographic/socioeconomic variables, health-related behaviors and body mass index among adolescents aged 10 to 19 years. Campinas Health Survey (ISACamp, 2008-2009).
Sugar intake accounted for 12.4% (95% CI: 11.6 to 13.1) of the total energy intake of the adolescents: 12.0% (95% CI: 11.1 to 12.9) among the boys and 12.7% (95% CI: 11.9 to 13.7) among the girls. The main sources of free sugars were beverages (54.8%), cookies (12.8%), sweets (12.4), cakes/breads (9.9%), table sugar/honey (7.9%) and other foods, such as chips, pizza and pasta (2.2%) (data not presented in table).
The prevalence of added sugar intake within the 5% limit of total energy intake of one’s diet was 20.1% and was higher among adolescents aged 15 to 19 years, those without private health insurance and those attending public school. Lower prevalence rates were found in the subgroups of adolescents with an income higher than the Brazilian monthly minimum wage, those with 16 or more appliances in the home and those whose heads of families had 12 or more years of schooling (Table 2).
Prevalence and prevalence ratios (PR) of added sugar intake within maximum limit of 5% of total energy intake from diet according to demographic and socioeconomic variables in adolescents aged 10 to 19 years. Campinas Health Survey (ISACamp, 2008-2009).
Table 3 shows that adolescents who used a computer or television more than three hours a day had higher added sugar intake. Moreover, higher prevalence rates of added sugar intake within the 5% limit of total energy intake were found with the increase in diet quality scores, with a nearly sevenfold higher rate among adolescents with the best diet quality (third tertile) compared to those with the worst diet quality (first tertile).
Prevalence and prevalence ratios (PR) of added sugar intake within maximum limit of 5% of total energy intake from diet according to health-related behaviors and BMI in adolescents aged 10 to 19 years. Campinas Health Survey (ISACamp, 2008-2009).
The results of the Poisson multiple regression analysis (Table 4) indicate that meeting the acceptable limit of added sugar in the diet was more frequent among adolescents aged 15 to 19 years, males, individuals not having been born in the state of São Paulo, those with a smaller number of appliances in the home, those who dedicated less time to the use of a TV and computer and those with higher diet quality scores.
Discussion
In the present study, only 20.1% of the adolescents complied with the WHO recommendation of added sugar intake not exceeding 5% of the total energy intake of one’s diet. Moreover, some segments of the population proved to be more vulnerable to high sugar intake, such as girls, those who had more screen time, those with a higher socioeconomic status, younger adolescents and those with very low diet quality scores.
One of the limitations of this study was the application of only a 24-hour dietary recall, which may not reflect the habitual intake of the adolescents, since considerable variation is found in terms of diet2424 Buzzard M. 24-Hour Dietary Recall and Food Record Methods. In: Willett W. Nutritional Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 50-73.. However, a 24HR is considered adequate for evaluating the mean intake of foods and nutrients when used in a population-based study and administered on different days of the week and in different months of the year2424 Buzzard M. 24-Hour Dietary Recall and Food Record Methods. In: Willett W. Nutritional Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 50-73.. Other limitation related to the use of a 24HR regards the difficulty in recalling all foods ingested in detail and the possibility of either overestimating or underestimating the size of the portions, which are key determinants of information quality. To minimize this limitation, the ISACamp interviewers were duly trained for the administration of the instrument and made use of a photo album2525 Zabotto CB, Vianna RPT, Gil MF. Registro Fotográfico para Inquéritos Dietéticos: Utensílios e Porções. Goiânia: Nepa-Unicamp; 1996.. Moreover, the cross-sectional design does not enable interpreting the findings in terms of cause and effect.
The contribution of added sugar to total energy intake was 12.4% (12.0% among boys and 12.7% among girls). This finding is lower than the figure reported in a national study, which was around 20.0% for males and 25.0% for females2626 Souza AM, Barufaldi LA, Abreu GA, Giannini DT, Oliveira CL, Santos MM, Leal VS, Vasconcelos FAG. ERICA: ingestão de macro e micronutrientes em adolescentes brasileiros. Rev Saude Publica 2016; 50(Supl. 1):5s.. The figure was also lower than the 19% reported in a European study (18.9% for boys and 19.9% for girls)2727 Mesana MI, Hilbig A, Androutsos O, Cuenca-García M, Dallongeville J, Huybrechts I, De Henauw S, Widhalm K, Kafatos A, Nova E, Marcos A, González-Gross M, Molnar D, Gottrand F, Moreno LA. Dietary sources of sugars in adolescents' diet: the HELENA study. Eur J Nutr 2016; 57(2):629-641. and figures reported in an American study (17.5% for boys and 16.6% for girls) involving adolescents aged 12 to 19 years2828 Ervin RB, Kit BK, Carroll MD, Ogden CL. Consumption of Added Sugar Among U.S. Children and Adolescents, 2005-2008. NCHS Data Brief 2012. [acessado 2017 Abr 15]. Disponível em: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db87.htm
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databr... . The lower contribution in the present study may be explained by some factors. In ERICA 2013-20142626 Souza AM, Barufaldi LA, Abreu GA, Giannini DT, Oliveira CL, Santos MM, Leal VS, Vasconcelos FAG. ERICA: ingestão de macro e micronutrientes em adolescentes brasileiros. Rev Saude Publica 2016; 50(Supl. 1):5s., 10 g of sugar was attributed to each 100 ml of beverage when the habitual consumption of sugar was reported, whereas 5g/100 ml was attributed in the ISACamp survey. Moreover, the consumption of highly processed products is much higher in developed countries than in Brazil44 Martins APB, Levy RB, Claro RM, Moubarac JC, Monteiro CA. Participação crescente de produtos ultraprocessados na dieta brasileira (1987-2009). Rev Saude Publica 2013; 47(4):656-665.,66 Steele EM, Baraldi LG, Louzada MLC, Moubarac JC, Mozaffarian D, Monteiro CA. Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the US diet: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2016; 6(3):e009892..
The main sources of sugar in the diet of the adolescents were sweetened beverages (54.8%), cookies (12.8%), candies (12.4%), cakes/bread (9.9%) and table sugar/honey (7.9%). In a previous study conducted in Brazil, the foods the most furnished added sugar to adolescents were candies and desserts (41.0%), beverages (soft drinks, juices and sweetened fruit drinks) (37.0%) and milk products (10.0%)2929 Pereira RA, Duffey KJ, Sichieri R, Popkin BM. Sources of excessive saturated fat, trans fat and sugar consumption in Brazil: an analysis of the first Brazilian nationwide individual dietary survey. Public Health Nutr 2014; 17(1):113-121.. In a study conducted in Europe, sweetened beverages, sweets, sugar/honey/jam and chocolate contributed more free sugar to the diet of adolescents2727 Mesana MI, Hilbig A, Androutsos O, Cuenca-García M, Dallongeville J, Huybrechts I, De Henauw S, Widhalm K, Kafatos A, Nova E, Marcos A, González-Gross M, Molnar D, Gottrand F, Moreno LA. Dietary sources of sugars in adolescents' diet: the HELENA study. Eur J Nutr 2016; 57(2):629-641.. The increase in the consumption of sweetened beverages is a major concern around the world88 Bray GA, Popkin BM. Calorie-sweetened beverages and fructose: what have we learned 10 years later. Pediatr Obes 2013; 8(4):242-248.,1212 Nseir W, Nassar F, Assy N. Soft drinks consumption and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(21):2579-2588.. The change in the consumption pattern was quite intense in Brazil. From 1974 to 2003, the participation of soft drinks to the total number of calories increased 400.0%3030 Levy-Costa RB, Sichieri R, Pontes NS, Monteiro CA. Disponibilidade domiciliar de alimentos no Brasil: distribuição e evolução (1974-2003). Rev Saude Publica 2005; 39(4):530-540.. Among adolescents at public schools in the city of Niterói in the state of Rio de Janeiro, the prevalence of the consumption of beverages with added sugar increased from 81.0% to 86.0% and the list included chocolate milk (37.0% to 44.0%), processed juice (22.0% to 25.0%) and guarana syrup-based drinks (25.0% to 33.0%); moreover, soft drinks stood out as the major source of energy from the diet at both evaluation times3131 Monteiro LS, Vasconcelos TM, Veiga GV, Pereira RA. Modificações no consumo de bebidas de adolescentes de escolas públicas na primeira década do século XXI. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2016; 19(2):348-361.. The Brazilian School Feeding Program (PNAE) has sought to reduce sugar intake by limiting the offer of sweets on the school menu to two portions per week (110 kcal/portion)3232 Brasil. Ministério da Educação (MEC). Nota Técnica nº 01/2014-COSAN/CGPAE/DIRAE/FNDE. Restrição da oferta de doces e preparações doces na alimentação escolar. Disponível em: http://www.fnde.gov.br/programas/pnae/pnae-area-para-gestores/pnae-notas-tecnicas-pareceres-relatorios
http://www.fnde.gov.br/programas/pnae/pn... and prohibiting the sale of these products in the cafeterias of public and private schools3333 Brasil. Conselho de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional. Pnae 62 anos: decretos regulamentam cardápios saudáveis para cantinas escolares. [acessado 2017 Abr 15]. Disponível em: http://www4.planalto.gov.br/consea/comunicacao/noticias/2017/abril/pnae-62-anos-decretos-regulamentam-cardapio-de-cantinas-escolares
http://www4.planalto.gov.br/consea/comun... .
In the present study, girls had higher sugar intake than boys. In the Study of Cardiovascular Risks in Adolescents (ERICA 2013-2014) conducted with adolescents aged 12 to 17 years, the contribution of free sugars to the total energy intake was 25.0% among the girls and 22.0% among the boys, which is more than twice the maximum limit stipulated by the Brazilian Ministry of Health (< 10%)2626 Souza AM, Barufaldi LA, Abreu GA, Giannini DT, Oliveira CL, Santos MM, Leal VS, Vasconcelos FAG. ERICA: ingestão de macro e micronutrientes em adolescentes brasileiros. Rev Saude Publica 2016; 50(Supl. 1):5s.. In European adolescents, added sugar represented 18.9% of total energy among males and 19.9% among females (p < 0.001)2727 Mesana MI, Hilbig A, Androutsos O, Cuenca-García M, Dallongeville J, Huybrechts I, De Henauw S, Widhalm K, Kafatos A, Nova E, Marcos A, González-Gross M, Molnar D, Gottrand F, Moreno LA. Dietary sources of sugars in adolescents' diet: the HELENA study. Eur J Nutr 2016; 57(2):629-641.. Data from the National School-based Health Survey (PeNSE) indicate the girls have a higher regular consumption (≥ five days a week) of sweets (58.4% versus 42.6%) and cookies (35.8% versus 31.1%) compared to boys and similar soft drink consumption (36.6% among females and 37.9% among males)3434 Levy RB, Castro IRR, Cardoso LO, Tavares LF, Sardinha LMV, Gomes FS, Costa AWN. Consumo e comportamento alimentar entre adolescentes brasileiros: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar (PeNSE), 2009. Cien Saude Colet 2010; 15(Supl. 2):3085-3097.. An analysis of the National Dietary Survey (INA 2008-2009) revealed that 54.0% of the energy availability in the homes of both sexes was from food products high in solid fats and sugar2929 Pereira RA, Duffey KJ, Sichieri R, Popkin BM. Sources of excessive saturated fat, trans fat and sugar consumption in Brazil: an analysis of the first Brazilian nationwide individual dietary survey. Public Health Nutr 2014; 17(1):113-121..
Added sugar intake was lower among adolescents between 15 and 19 years of age, as a 51.0% greater frequency of meeting the recent WHO recommendation was found in this group. Behavioral changes, such as the omission of meals and concerns with body weight, may partially explain the observed reduction in sugar intake. Among the participants of the ERICA 2013-2014 (Study of Cardiovascular Risks in Adolescents), the prevalence of skipping breakfast went from 20.1% (95% CI: 18.8 to 21.6%) among adolescents aged 12 to 14 years to 24.0% (95% CI: 22.5 to 25.7%) among those aged 15 to 17 years3535 Barufaldi LA, Abreu GA, Oliveira JS, Santos DF, Fujimori E, Vasconcelos SML, Vasconcelos FAG, Tavares BM. ERICA: prevalência de comportamentos alimentares saudáveis em adolescentes brasileiros. Rev Saude Publica 2016; 50(Supl. 1):6s.. In the Campinas Health Survey, the prevalence of dissatisfaction with one’s weight was 43.7% (95% CI: 37.9 to 49.8%) among those in the ideal weight range, reaching a prevalence ratio of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1 to 1.7) in the 15-to-19-year-old age group compared to the 10-to-14-year-old age group3636 Martini MCS, Assumpção D, Barros MBA, Canesqui AM, Barros Filho AA. Are normal-weight adolescents satisfied with their weight? Sao Paulo Med J 2016; 134(3):219-227..
Lower sugar intake was found among individuals who had not been born in the state of São Paulo. Data from the Household Budget Survey (POF) revealed that the contribution of added sugar to total energy intake was higher in the southeastern region of the country (18.1%) and lower in the northern (13.0%), northeastern, southern (16.3%) and central western (16.7%) regions55 Levy RB, Claro RM, Bandoni DH, Mondini L, Monteiro CA. Disponibilidade de "açúcares de adição" no Brasil: distribuição, fontes alimentares e tendência temporal. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2012; 15(1):3-12.. Regarding the consumption of foods and beverages in the different regions of Brazil, Souza et al.2626 Souza AM, Barufaldi LA, Abreu GA, Giannini DT, Oliveira CL, Santos MM, Leal VS, Vasconcelos FAG. ERICA: ingestão de macro e micronutrientes em adolescentes brasileiros. Rev Saude Publica 2016; 50(Supl. 1):5s. found important variations in the prevalence rates of soft drinks (about 40% in North and Northeast to 51.2% in the South), juices (46.4% in the south to 59.7% in the Northeast), sweets and desserts (23.2% in the North, 33,4% in the Northeast and 45.9% in the South) and cookies (16.6% in the North, 25.1% in the Southeast and 32.2% in the Northeast). The lower intake of added sugar among individuals not from the state in which they reside may be explained by lower access to processed and highly processed food products stemming from a poorer socioeconomic status or the possible conservation of food culture.
The number of appliances in the home, which is an indicator of socioeconomic status, was associated with higher free sugar intake. The results of the PeNSE 2009 (National School-based Health Survey) indicate a significant increase in the regular consumption (≥ 5 days/week) of soft drinks, sweets and cookies with the increase in the “goods and services” score, which is an indicator composed of consumer goods, an in-door bathroom and maid in the home3434 Levy RB, Castro IRR, Cardoso LO, Tavares LF, Sardinha LMV, Gomes FS, Costa AWN. Consumo e comportamento alimentar entre adolescentes brasileiros: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar (PeNSE), 2009. Cien Saude Colet 2010; 15(Supl. 2):3085-3097.. In Brazil, the caloric contribution of added sugar in items such as soft drinks, sweets, cookies and milk-based beverages increased from 17.4% at the end of the 1980s to 35.5% in 2002-200355 Levy RB, Claro RM, Bandoni DH, Mondini L, Monteiro CA. Disponibilidade de "açúcares de adição" no Brasil: distribuição, fontes alimentares e tendência temporal. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2012; 15(1):3-12.. Between two periods of the Household Budget Survey (2002-2003 and 2008-2009), the participation of highly processed foods to the total home energy availability grew nearly five percentage points (20.8% to 25.4%), increasing significantly with the improvement in income44 Martins APB, Levy RB, Claro RM, Moubarac JC, Monteiro CA. Participação crescente de produtos ultraprocessados na dieta brasileira (1987-2009). Rev Saude Publica 2013; 47(4):656-665.. In emerging countries, a 127% increase in calories from sugar occurred in four decades (1963 to 2003), which was related to a broad gamut of factors, such as urbanization, economic growth, marketing, the opening of the market to importation, the expansion of transnational food corporations and the globalization of eating systems, with the replacement of traditional healthy foods for fast food1414 Kearney J. Food consumption trends and drivers. Phil Trans R Soc B 2010; 365(1554):2793-2807..
The prevalence of added sugar intake within the maximum limit of 5% was lower among adolescents with more screen time. In the PeNSE 2012 edition (National School-based Health Survey), the habit of watching television for two or more hours a day was reported by 78.6% (95% CI: 77.9 to 79.3%) of the participants and the habit of eating in front of the TV was reported by 64.0% (95% CI: 60.7 to 67.2%), with no significant difference between sexes3737 Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar 2012. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2013.. Using data from the PeNSE 2009 edition, Camelo et al.3838 Camelo LV, Rodrigues JFC, Giatti L, Barreto SM. Lazer sedentário e consumo de alimentos entre adolescentes brasileiros: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar (PeNSE), 2009. Cad Saude Publica 2012; 28(11):2155-2162. found that watching TV for more than two hours a day significantly increased the odds of the regular consumption of unhealthy foods, such as sweets (odds ratio [OR] = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.40 to 1.61), soft drinks (OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.43), cookies (OR = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.35 to 1.57) and processed meats (OR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.29 to 1.56), which are products that are highly publicized in advertisements. In a cohort study conducted in New Zealand, 61% of children and adolescents (five to 15 years of age) spent more than two hours a day watching TV, to which was attributed 17% of overweight, 15% of compromised cardiopulmonary capacity, 15% of high cholesterol and 17% of smoking at 26 years of age3939 Hancox RJ, Milne BJ, Poulton R. Association between child and adolescent television viewing and adult health: a longitudinal birth cohort study. Lancet 2004; 364(9430):257-262..
Adolescents with higher diet quality scores had higher prevalence rates of complying with the recommended 5% limit of added sugar to total energy intake. Using data from the 2008-2009 Household Budget Survey, Louzada et al.4040 Louzada MLC, Martins APB, Canella DS, Baraldi LG, Levy RB, Claro RM, Moubarac JC, Cannon G, Monteiro CA. Alimentos ultraprocessados e perfil nutricional da dieta no Brasil. Rev Saude Publica 2015; 49:38. found that the portion of the diet referring to in natura or minimally processed foods had less free sugar, saturated fat and trans fat as well as more dietary fiber, protein and potassium in comparison to the portion corresponding to highly processed products.
The present study identified epidemiological aspects of the prevalence of added sugar intake in adolescents, estimated based on the recommendation of the World Health Organization to reduce the amount of free sugars to a maximum of 5% of the calorie intake of one’s diet. The most vulnerable segments to high sugar intake were girls, adolescents who had more screen time and those with a poorer overall diet quality. These findings reveal the simultaneity of inappropriate behaviors and can assist in the development of strategies directed at health promotion and the adoption of positive changes in lifestyle, including a healthy diet, the practice of physical exercise and social relations. The Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian population1616 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde (MS). Guia Alimentar para a População Brasileira. Brasília: MS; 2014. and the Intersectoral Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Obesity: Recommendations for States and Municipalities4141 Brasil. Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome (MDF). Estratégia Intersetorial de Prevenção e Controle da Obesidade: recomendações para estados e municípios. Brasília: CAISAN; 2014. are important instruments for guiding healthy eating behaviors as well as preventing/controlling obesity and other chronic diseases.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq [Brazilian National Council of Scientific and Technological Development]) for funding the study and awarding a productivity grant to MBA Barros; the Campinas Municipal Secretary of Health and the Secretary of Health Surveillance of the Ministry of Health for funding the field research for ISACAMP 2008-2009; and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES [Coordination for the Advancement of Higher Education Personnel]) for the doctoral grant awarded to D Assumpção.
References
- 1World Health Organization (WHO). Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children Geneva: WHO; 2015.
- 2Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids Washington: The National Academies Press; 2002.
- 3Bray GA. Energy and Fructose From Beverages Sweetened With Sugar or High-Fructose Corn Syrup Pose a Health Risk for Some People. Adv Nutr 2013; 4(2):220-225.
- 4Martins APB, Levy RB, Claro RM, Moubarac JC, Monteiro CA. Participação crescente de produtos ultraprocessados na dieta brasileira (1987-2009). Rev Saude Publica 2013; 47(4):656-665.
- 5Levy RB, Claro RM, Bandoni DH, Mondini L, Monteiro CA. Disponibilidade de "açúcares de adição" no Brasil: distribuição, fontes alimentares e tendência temporal. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2012; 15(1):3-12.
- 6Steele EM, Baraldi LG, Louzada MLC, Moubarac JC, Mozaffarian D, Monteiro CA. Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the US diet: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2016; 6(3):e009892.
- 7DiNicolantonio JJ, Berger A. Added sugars drive nutrient and energy deficit in obesity: a new paradigm. Open Heart 2016; 3(2):e000469.
- 8Bray GA, Popkin BM. Calorie-sweetened beverages and fructose: what have we learned 10 years later. Pediatr Obes 2013; 8(4):242-248.
- 9Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Després JP, Hu FB. Sugar Sweetened Beverages, Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease risk. Circulation 2010; 121(11):1356-1364.
- 10Malik AH, Akram Y, Shetty S, Malik SS, Njike VY. Impact of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages on Blood Pressure. Am J Cardiol 2014; 113(9):1574-1580.
- 11Micha R, Peñalvo JL, Cudhea F, Imamura F, Rehm CD, Mozaffarian D. Association Between Dietary Factors and Mortality From Heart Disease, Stroke, and Type 2 Diabetes in the United States. JAMA 2017; 317(9):912-924.
- 12Nseir W, Nassar F, Assy N. Soft drinks consumption and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(21):2579-2588.
- 13Kearns CE, Glantz SA, Schmidt LA. Sugar Industry Influence on the Scientific Agenda of the National Institute of Dental Research's 1971 National Caries Program: A Historical Analysis of Internal Documents. PLoS Med 2015; 12(3):e1001798.
- 14Kearney J. Food consumption trends and drivers. Phil Trans R Soc B 2010; 365(1554):2793-2807.
- 15Instituto Brasileiro de Defesa do Consumidor (Idec). Redução de sódio em alimentos: uma análise dos acordos voluntários no Brasil São Paulo: Idec; 2014. Cadernos Idec-Série Alimentos. Volume 1.
- 16Brasil. Ministério da Saúde (MS). Guia Alimentar para a População Brasileira Brasília: MS; 2014.
- 17Alves MCGP. ISA-Campinas 2008/09: plano de amostragem [acessado 2017 Abr 10]. Disponível em: http://www.fcm.unicamp.br/fcm/sites/default/files/plano_de_amostragem.pdf
» http://www.fcm.unicamp.br/fcm/sites/default/files/plano_de_amostragem.pdf - 18Fisberg RM, Villar BS. Manual de receitas e medidas caseiras para cálculo de inquéritos alimentares São Paulo: Editora Signus; 2002.
- 19Pinheiro ABV, Lacerda EMA, Benzecry EH, Gomes MCS, Costa VM. Tabela para avaliação de consumo alimentar em medidas caseiras São Paulo: Editora Atheneu; 2004.
- 20World Health Organization (WHO). Global recommendations on physical activity for health Geneva: WHO; 2010.
- 21Previdelli AN, Andrade SC, Pires MM, Ferreira SRG, Fisberg RM, Marchioni DM. Índice de Qualidade da Dieta Revisado para população brasileira. Rev Saude Publica 2011; 45(4):794-798.
- 22Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Siyam A, Nishida C, Siekmann J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ 2007; 85(9):660-667.
- 23Willett WC, Howe GR, Kushi LH. Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr 1997; 65(4 Supl.):1220S-1228S.
- 24Buzzard M. 24-Hour Dietary Recall and Food Record Methods. In: Willett W. Nutritional Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 50-73.
- 25Zabotto CB, Vianna RPT, Gil MF. Registro Fotográfico para Inquéritos Dietéticos: Utensílios e Porções Goiânia: Nepa-Unicamp; 1996.
- 26Souza AM, Barufaldi LA, Abreu GA, Giannini DT, Oliveira CL, Santos MM, Leal VS, Vasconcelos FAG. ERICA: ingestão de macro e micronutrientes em adolescentes brasileiros. Rev Saude Publica 2016; 50(Supl. 1):5s.
- 27Mesana MI, Hilbig A, Androutsos O, Cuenca-García M, Dallongeville J, Huybrechts I, De Henauw S, Widhalm K, Kafatos A, Nova E, Marcos A, González-Gross M, Molnar D, Gottrand F, Moreno LA. Dietary sources of sugars in adolescents' diet: the HELENA study. Eur J Nutr 2016; 57(2):629-641.
- 28Ervin RB, Kit BK, Carroll MD, Ogden CL. Consumption of Added Sugar Among U.S. Children and Adolescents, 2005-2008. NCHS Data Brief 2012. [acessado 2017 Abr 15]. Disponível em: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db87.htm
» https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db87.htm - 29Pereira RA, Duffey KJ, Sichieri R, Popkin BM. Sources of excessive saturated fat, trans fat and sugar consumption in Brazil: an analysis of the first Brazilian nationwide individual dietary survey. Public Health Nutr 2014; 17(1):113-121.
- 30Levy-Costa RB, Sichieri R, Pontes NS, Monteiro CA. Disponibilidade domiciliar de alimentos no Brasil: distribuição e evolução (1974-2003). Rev Saude Publica 2005; 39(4):530-540.
- 31Monteiro LS, Vasconcelos TM, Veiga GV, Pereira RA. Modificações no consumo de bebidas de adolescentes de escolas públicas na primeira década do século XXI. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2016; 19(2):348-361.
- 32Brasil. Ministério da Educação (MEC). Nota Técnica nº 01/2014-COSAN/CGPAE/DIRAE/FNDE. Restrição da oferta de doces e preparações doces na alimentação escolar. Disponível em: http://www.fnde.gov.br/programas/pnae/pnae-area-para-gestores/pnae-notas-tecnicas-pareceres-relatorios
» http://www.fnde.gov.br/programas/pnae/pnae-area-para-gestores/pnae-notas-tecnicas-pareceres-relatorios - 33Brasil. Conselho de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional. Pnae 62 anos: decretos regulamentam cardápios saudáveis para cantinas escolares. [acessado 2017 Abr 15]. Disponível em: http://www4.planalto.gov.br/consea/comunicacao/noticias/2017/abril/pnae-62-anos-decretos-regulamentam-cardapio-de-cantinas-escolares
» http://www4.planalto.gov.br/consea/comunicacao/noticias/2017/abril/pnae-62-anos-decretos-regulamentam-cardapio-de-cantinas-escolares - 34Levy RB, Castro IRR, Cardoso LO, Tavares LF, Sardinha LMV, Gomes FS, Costa AWN. Consumo e comportamento alimentar entre adolescentes brasileiros: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar (PeNSE), 2009. Cien Saude Colet 2010; 15(Supl. 2):3085-3097.
- 35Barufaldi LA, Abreu GA, Oliveira JS, Santos DF, Fujimori E, Vasconcelos SML, Vasconcelos FAG, Tavares BM. ERICA: prevalência de comportamentos alimentares saudáveis em adolescentes brasileiros. Rev Saude Publica 2016; 50(Supl. 1):6s.
- 36Martini MCS, Assumpção D, Barros MBA, Canesqui AM, Barros Filho AA. Are normal-weight adolescents satisfied with their weight? Sao Paulo Med J 2016; 134(3):219-227.
- 37Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar 2012. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2013.
- 38Camelo LV, Rodrigues JFC, Giatti L, Barreto SM. Lazer sedentário e consumo de alimentos entre adolescentes brasileiros: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar (PeNSE), 2009. Cad Saude Publica 2012; 28(11):2155-2162.
- 39Hancox RJ, Milne BJ, Poulton R. Association between child and adolescent television viewing and adult health: a longitudinal birth cohort study. Lancet 2004; 364(9430):257-262.
- 40Louzada MLC, Martins APB, Canella DS, Baraldi LG, Levy RB, Claro RM, Moubarac JC, Cannon G, Monteiro CA. Alimentos ultraprocessados e perfil nutricional da dieta no Brasil. Rev Saude Publica 2015; 49:38.
- 41Brasil. Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome (MDF). Estratégia Intersetorial de Prevenção e Controle da Obesidade: recomendações para estados e municípios Brasília: CAISAN; 2014.
Publication Dates
- Publication in this collection
05 Sept 2019 - Date of issue
Sept 2019
History
- Received
22 Apr 2017 - Accepted
13 Feb 2018 - Published
15 Feb 2018