Abstract
The situation of caregivers and family caregivers of dependent older adults is presented and discussed, highlighting their dedication, problems, and possible recommendations to value them. The task of caring is known to be eminently feminine, invisible, unpaid, but affects society as a whole. Policies of some European countries, Canada, and the United States in favor of male and female caregivers are described. However, most existing support models have gaps. The laws and regulations enacted have been poorly comprehensive, inorganic, and the family remains responsible for long-lived relatives who have lost their autonomy. In many countries, besides other measures, the tendency is to integrate the family care as the first PHC level, universalizing support to caregivers. One must not be forgotten that the tendency to keep dependent older adults at home is acquiescence to their desire, but it also hides the delegation of responsibility from the State to families through dehospitalization and deinstitutionalization policies. In Brazil, the issue has not yet entered the public policy radar, although it is urgent because of the accelerated increase of the elderly population, particularly those aged 80 and over.
Key words:
Health policies; Social policies; Dependent elderly; Informal caregivers
Introduction
This reflective essay aims to discuss the informal work of mostly female caregivers of dependent older adults and propose supporting evidence for a policy that values them11 Gaymu J, Ekamper O, Beets G. Who will be caring for Europe's dependent elders in 2030? Sociologie and Culture 2007; 62(4):675-706.. The period covered by the reflection dates back from post-World War II when European countries created and institutionalized their social welfare systems. These countries introduced care for dependent people and family caregivers into the State’s social action agenda.
Fifty years ago, ‘family care’, also called ‘informal care’, was unknown as an expression or concept. This began to change when feminist and academic activists in developed countries in the 1970s drew the attention of governments and society to the fact that women were doing unpaid work in most families. The term “informal” was criticized for its social and economic veiling nature. At the same time, this awareness was concomitant with the movement towards the dehospitalization and provision of health services close to the community and within the family22 Hoff A. Current and future challenges of family care in the UK. London: Government Office of Science; 2015.
3 European Association Working For Carers. Carers in Europe. [document in Internet]. 2020 Fev. [cited 2020 Fev 23]:[about 8 p.]. Available from: http://www.eurocarers.org/userfiles/file/Factsheet 2009.pd
http://www.eurocarers.org/userfiles/file... -44 Glendinning C, Arksey H, Tjadens F. Care provision within families and its socio-economic impact on care providers: Report for the European Commission SPRU, York: University of York; 2009.. Thus, in the 1980s and 1990s, informal or family care became a widely recognized term and acquired a position on the health and social assistance policy agenda.
The governments of many countries, particularly those in Europe33 European Association Working For Carers. Carers in Europe. [document in Internet]. 2020 Fev. [cited 2020 Fev 23]:[about 8 p.]. Available from: http://www.eurocarers.org/userfiles/file/Factsheet 2009.pd
http://www.eurocarers.org/userfiles/file...
4 Glendinning C, Arksey H, Tjadens F. Care provision within families and its socio-economic impact on care providers: Report for the European Commission SPRU, York: University of York; 2009.
5 Feinberg L, Reinhard SC, Houser A, Choula R. Valuing the invaluable: The growing contributions and costs of family caregiving. Washington: AARP Public Policy Institute; 2011.-66 Silva AL, Teixeira HJ, Teixeira MJC, Freitas S. The needs of informal caregivers of elderly people living at home: an integrative review. Scand J Caring Sci 2013; 27(4):792-803., currently consider family care as relevant, not only because it is the most desired by older adults who suffer some or multiple dependences but also because it reduces hospitalization expenses. For this reason, several societies already see it as the last frontier of primary care77 McNamara B, Rosenwax L. Which carers of family members at the end of life need more support from health services and why? Soc Sci Med 2010; 70(7):1035-1041.. Thus, dependence and family care provided, above all, by women, previously restricted to the private sphere, has been gaining importance and is the subject of a vast bibliography, considering that the number of older adults across the planet (less in some African countries) is the one growing the most, both in quantity and longevity88 Organization of Economic Development (OCDE).Policies to support family cargivers. IV chapter. In: Organization of Economic Development (OCDE). Help wanted? Providing and paying for long term care. OCDE Publishing: Paris; 2011. p. 121-158..
In places where aging has occurred slowly and persistently, such as the European Union and the countries members of the Organization for Development Cooperation, informal care has been on the agenda since 1996. In 2020, however, for the first time, it gained visibility at a world-class event, the World Economic Forum in Davos, the “richest men’s club” in the world. Oxfam99 Oxfam. Relatório sobre nós e a desigualdade "tempo de cuidar". Fórum Econômico Mundial de 2020, Davos. [documento da Internet]. 2020 Jan. [acessado 2020 Jan. 31]. Disponível em: https://oxfam.org.br/justica-social-e-economica/forum-economico-de-davos/tempo-de-cuidar/
https://oxfam.org.br/justica-social-e-ec... spearheaded the event with the document “Time to Care”99 Oxfam. Relatório sobre nós e a desigualdade "tempo de cuidar". Fórum Econômico Mundial de 2020, Davos. [documento da Internet]. 2020 Jan. [acessado 2020 Jan. 31]. Disponível em: https://oxfam.org.br/justica-social-e-economica/forum-economico-de-davos/tempo-de-cuidar/
https://oxfam.org.br/justica-social-e-ec... , which opened informal care as an issue of assisting older adults and serving the universe of people who could not survive if women did not support them. This document addressed, in particular, the cultural issue and the exploitation of unpaid female labor.
Here is a summary of what was said. In 2019, 2,153 global billionaires held more wealth than 65% of the global population, 4.6 billion people out of more than seven billion. One of the reasons for this widening gap is the sexist global system that values the wealth of the privileged few at the expense of billions of unpaid, exclusive hours, particularly by women globally, to provide care to people in the invisible homes. Oxfam points out that women and girls around the world devote 12.5 billion hours every day to unpaid care, a contribution of at least US$ 10.8 trillion a year to the global economy.
Governments worldwide must act to build a human economy [...] that values what matters to society, instead of promoting an endless search for profit and wealth. Investing in national care systems to address the issue of disproportionate responsibility assumed by the work of women and girls, adopting a progressive tax system, with taxes on wealth, and legislating on behalf of those who care, are possible and crucial steps to be taken towards change99 Oxfam. Relatório sobre nós e a desigualdade "tempo de cuidar". Fórum Econômico Mundial de 2020, Davos. [documento da Internet]. 2020 Jan. [acessado 2020 Jan. 31]. Disponível em: https://oxfam.org.br/justica-social-e-economica/forum-economico-de-davos/tempo-de-cuidar/
https://oxfam.org.br/justica-social-e-ec... .
Oxfam99 Oxfam. Relatório sobre nós e a desigualdade "tempo de cuidar". Fórum Econômico Mundial de 2020, Davos. [documento da Internet]. 2020 Jan. [acessado 2020 Jan. 31]. Disponível em: https://oxfam.org.br/justica-social-e-economica/forum-economico-de-davos/tempo-de-cuidar/
https://oxfam.org.br/justica-social-e-ec... points out that if care continues to be women’s natural obligation, they will remain out of the job market, as today, 42% of them of working age are outside the so-called productive sector, while the percentage of men is only 6%, according to data supported by the Research Group of the Credit Suisse Bank1010 Research Institute of Crédit Suisse. The Global wealth report 2019. [document on the Internet]. 2020 Fev [cited 2020 Fev 07]: [about 2 p.]. Available from: https://www.credit-suisse.com/about-us/en/reports-research/global-wealth-report.html.
https://www.credit-suisse.com/about-us/e... . These women’s invisible activities guarantee the functioning of society and the economy, while their obscurity and lack of recognition perpetuate gender and economic inequality99 Oxfam. Relatório sobre nós e a desigualdade "tempo de cuidar". Fórum Econômico Mundial de 2020, Davos. [documento da Internet]. 2020 Jan. [acessado 2020 Jan. 31]. Disponível em: https://oxfam.org.br/justica-social-e-economica/forum-economico-de-davos/tempo-de-cuidar/
https://oxfam.org.br/justica-social-e-ec... .
The dependent caregiver/elderly dyad issue is an urgent topic for the world and Latin America. According to the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO)1111 Organização Panamericana de Saúde (OPAS). Plano de ação para a saúde da população idosa. 2020. Washington: OPAS; 2015., the number of people in need of long-term care will more than triple in the region in the next three decades. It will rise from the current eight million to 27-30 million by 2050. PAHO1111 Organização Panamericana de Saúde (OPAS). Plano de ação para a saúde da população idosa. 2020. Washington: OPAS; 2015. draws attention to the fact that, while an increase in the longer-lived and dependent population is noted, a vital shortage of formal and informal caregivers and professionals specially prepared health services is observed.
In Brazil, studies based on the National Household Sample Survey1212 Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios 2008: Um Panorama da Saúde no Brasil. Acesso e utilização dos serviços, condições de saúde e fatores de risco e proteção à saúde 2008. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, MS, MPOG, Fiocruz; 2010.,1313 Bandeira L, Melo HP, Pinheiro LS. Mulheres em dados: o que informa a PNAD/IBGE 2008. Revista do Observatório Brasil da Igualdade de Gênero 2010; (7):107-119. anticipated what was discussed at the Davos Forum, saying that if informal care, performed mainly by women, were paid, it would increase the National GDP by 10.3%. Vasconcelos1414 Vasconcelos M. Responsabilidades familiares. Secretaria Especial de Políticas para as Mulheres. Revista do Observatório Brasil da Igualdade de Gênero 9;(1):36-43. and Küchemann1515 Kuchemann BA. Envelhecimento populacional, cuidado e cidadania: velhos dilemas e novos desafios. Soc Estado 2012; 27(1):165-180. consider that women’s responsibility for informal care contributes to foster the understanding that social reproduction is their responsibility and not that of society. Besides undermining an equitable division of responsibilities between men and women, it also influences the absence of priorities in public policies, resulting in the State’s silence, the deficit of public services addressed to cover these tasks, and, consequently, increased inequality and poverty. Even when remunerated, care is usually provided by social groups that receive low wages, such as domestic workers in Brazil and undocumented immigrant women in Europe and other countries22 Hoff A. Current and future challenges of family care in the UK. London: Government Office of Science; 2015.,55 Feinberg L, Reinhard SC, Houser A, Choula R. Valuing the invaluable: The growing contributions and costs of family caregiving. Washington: AARP Public Policy Institute; 2011.,1515 Kuchemann BA. Envelhecimento populacional, cuidado e cidadania: velhos dilemas e novos desafios. Soc Estado 2012; 27(1):165-180.,1616 Ministerio de Salud. Atención a las personas em situación de dependencia en España: Libro Blanco. Madrid: MS; 2004..
The issue of informal care exercised by women has a much broader spectrum than the care for older adults: responsibility for children, the home, domestic chores, which, in general, burdens them with a double or triple working day. However, in this paper, the theme is restricted to informal care for dependent older adults, considering that the population over 60 years of age grows the most1717 Alcântara AO, Camarano AA, Giacomin KC. Política Nacional do Idoso: velhas e novas questões. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA; 2016.,1818 Lima-Costa MF, Peixoto SV, Malta DC, Szwarcwald CL, Mambrini JVM. Cuidado informal e remunerado aos idosos no Brasil. Rev Saude Publica 2017; 51:6s., with emphasis on the increase of those who reached 80 years or more, stage of life that is more vulnerable from a social and health viewpoint1919 Baltes PB, Smith J. Novas Fronteiras para o futuro do envelhecimento: a velhice bem-sucedida do idoso jovem aos dilemas da Quarta Idade. A Terceira Idade 2006; 7(36):7-31.. According to IBGE estimates, in 2050, Brazil will have around 77 million care-dependent people (just over a third of the estimated population) among older adults and children2020 Minayo MCS. O imperativo de cuidar da pessoa idosa dependente. Cien Saude Colet 2019; 24(1):247-252..
Understanding the social relevance and for the health system of the topic at hand, we propose to define the situation of female caregivers and dependent older adults, showing briefly what is being done by some countries to provide support, protection, and dignity to this dyad so fundamental to the present and future society. The choice of countries is justified because they have specific policies to protect all caregivers of dependent people. This paper is a tribute to female caregivers!
The situation of female caregivers and dependent older adults
Female caregivers - Caring stems from social expectations about the family’s cultural concept and remains part of women’s obligations. No profound cultural changes of the male ethos or significant reforms by the National States alleviate the weight of these so-called obligations2121 Cangiano A, Shutes I, Spencer S, Leeson G. Migrant care workers in ageing societies. Oxford: University of Oxford; 2009. (Report on Research in the United Kingdom. COMPAS). in the vein of global transformations and gender discussions. It usually so happens that, in families, women are chosen as caregivers by the person receiving care, self-chosen, or even perform this role because there is no other option. In Brazil, their age spectrum ranges from 26 to 86 years1515 Kuchemann BA. Envelhecimento populacional, cuidado e cidadania: velhos dilemas e novos desafios. Soc Estado 2012; 27(1):165-180.. These are women who give up their personal, professional, social, and emotional lives. Furthermore, even when her work is bathed in love and recognition, she is impoverished from an economic and social viewpoint and has since then had a restricted and confined existence, solely dedicated to the dependent relative. Those that are supported by some type of income consider this contribution insufficient, and those living on a low income reduce support options in light of the burden of needs. Most say they receive no help from anyone and no economic reward for their dedication2222 Karsch UM. Idosos dependentes: famílias e cuidadores. Cad Saude Publica 2003; 19(3):861-866.
23 Houser A, Gibson MJ. Valuing the invaluable: the economic value of family caregiving. AARP Policy Institute 2008; 13(3):1-30.-2424 Eales J, Kim C, Fast J. A snapshot of Canadians caring for persons with dementia: the toll it takes. Edmonton: University of Alberta Research on Aging, Policies and Practice; 2015..
Caring always affects the caregiver’s life. In studies that compare them with the general population, they are represented with worse physical health, more frequent use of medications, high rates of depression and anxiety, stress, distress, dissatisfaction with life, and feeling of overload. Evidence has shown that cognitive impairment and mental illness in older adults are costlier for those caring for them than physical problems22 Hoff A. Current and future challenges of family care in the UK. London: Government Office of Science; 2015.,2222 Karsch UM. Idosos dependentes: famílias e cuidadores. Cad Saude Publica 2003; 19(3):861-866.
23 Houser A, Gibson MJ. Valuing the invaluable: the economic value of family caregiving. AARP Policy Institute 2008; 13(3):1-30.
24 Eales J, Kim C, Fast J. A snapshot of Canadians caring for persons with dementia: the toll it takes. Edmonton: University of Alberta Research on Aging, Policies and Practice; 2015.-2525 Wolfe KKN, Gibson MJ. Listening to Family Caregivers: The Need to Include Family Caregiver Assessment in Medicaid Home and Community-Based Service Waiver Programs. Washington: AARP Public Policy Institute; 2013.. The mental health aggravations of people accompanying older adults often exacerbate with care time66 Silva AL, Teixeira HJ, Teixeira MJC, Freitas S. The needs of informal caregivers of elderly people living at home: an integrative review. Scand J Caring Sci 2013; 27(4):792-803.,2222 Karsch UM. Idosos dependentes: famílias e cuidadores. Cad Saude Publica 2003; 19(3):861-866.. Furthermore, caregivers experience an increased expenditure on electricity bills, geriatric and medical supplies, transportation, and home adjustments. As the Spanish Ministry of Health mentions in Libro Blanco de la Dependencia (“White Book of Dependence”)1616 Ministerio de Salud. Atención a las personas em situación de dependencia en España: Libro Blanco. Madrid: MS; 2004., this reality “places women in a discriminatory situation before protection systems, since they are the ones that benefit from social life the least while producing well-being the most”1616 Ministerio de Salud. Atención a las personas em situación de dependencia en España: Libro Blanco. Madrid: MS; 2004..
Dependent older adults - The World Health Organization2626 World Health Organization (WHO). World Report on Ageing and Health. Gèneve: WHO; 2015. considers that vulnerable older adults have the following characteristics: age over 80 years; living alone; single women or widows; LTCF residents; socially isolated; without children; with severe limitations or physical, motor, psychological and neurological disabilities; couples over 65 when one of the spouses is disabled or ill, and those living with scant resources. In the several dependence policies in place today, older adults are classified by the severity of their autonomy loss. The most vulnerable are usually those affected by mental illnesses such as depression, Alzheimer’s, senile dementia, movement loss, urinary incontinence, insomnia, and are in a terminal state or a condition of social or freedom deprivation2727 Moraes CL, Apratto Junior PC, Reichenheim ME. Rompendo o silêncio e suas barreiras: um inquérito domiciliar sobre a violência doméstica contra idosos em área de abrangência do Programa Médico de Família de Niterói, RJ, Brasil. Cad Saude Publica 2008; 24(10):2289-2300.,2828 Apratto Júnior PC. A violência doméstica contra idosos nas áreas de abrangência do Programa Saúde da Família de Niterói (RJ, Brasil). Cien Saude Colet 2010; 15(6):2983-2995..
The European Council, a body of the European Union2929 Unión Europea (UE). Consejo de Europa. Retos de la política social en las sociedades europeas que envejecen. Bruselas: Comisión Europea; 2003. (Recomendación 1591)., defines dependents as people who, for reasons associated with the reduction or even the lack of some capacity, need to be assisted or helped to carry out daily activities, implying the presence of at least another person for support. Such activities are divided into two categories: basic and instrumental. The first concerns self-care tasks, such as dressing up, eating, doing personal hygiene, and getting around. The second designates activities necessary for personal and social development and favor the integration and participation of the individual in their surroundings, such as shopping, paying bills, maintaining social commitments, using means of transport, cooking, communicating, taking care of their health, and preserving their integrity and security. In Brazil, this same classification is defined in the National Policy for Older Adults3030 Brasil. Lei nº 8.842 de 5 de Janeiro de 1994. Dispõe sobre Política Nacional do Idoso, cria o Conselho Nacional o Idoso e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União 1994; 05 Jan. and the National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa)3131 Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA). RDC no. 283, de 26 de setembro de 2005. [documento na Internet]. 2005 [acessado 2020 Mar 16]; [cerca de 4 p.]. Disponível em: www.portalsaude.gov.br.
www.portalsaude.gov.br... .
Finally, it is essential to note that in Brazil, older adults and their caregivers go through several problems simultaneously, and both are often violated in their rights. Social inequalities create enormous challenges for the provision of services. Many live in inadequate housing and living conditions, and those receiving the minimum wage - today an essential and indispensable benefit - are unable to cover their basic needs for food, medicine, supplies, and transportation. There is also a shortage of health and social service professionals prepared to provide care to the dependent person and support the caregiver, and a lack of technological resources to integrate care, offer adequate information, facilitate tasks, and help in emergencies3232 Lima-Costa MF, Manbrini JVM, Peixoto SV, Malta DC, Macinko J. Socioeconomic inequalities in activities of daily living limitations and in the provision of informal and formal care for non institutionalized older Brazilians: National Health Survey, 2013. Int J Equity Health 2016; 15(1):137-145..
Policies to support caregivers and informal caregivers
The discussion on the role of the State in supporting caregivers and family caregivers will be seen here at several levels: from the viewpoint of political action, of those who provide care and at the macro-social level. Some countries that have institutionalized or are institutionalizing support for caregivers and family caregivers in their Social Security Systems will be mentioned3333 Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1990.,3434 Pasinato MTM, Kornis GM. A inserção dos cuidados de longa duração para idosos no âmbito dos sistemas de seguridade social: experiência internacional In: Camarano AA, organizadora. Cuidados de Longa Duração para a População Idosa: um novo risco social a ser assumido. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA; 2010. p. 40-66..
Political action initiatives - The European Union Bloc stands out in addressing aging, treating it not as a problem but as a challenging social phenomenon for its societies. Policymakers in these countries (EU, 2003)2929 Unión Europea (UE). Consejo de Europa. Retos de la política social en las sociedades europeas que envejecen. Bruselas: Comisión Europea; 2003. (Recomendación 1591). and those part of the OECD88 Organization of Economic Development (OCDE).Policies to support family cargivers. IV chapter. In: Organization of Economic Development (OCDE). Help wanted? Providing and paying for long term care. OCDE Publishing: Paris; 2011. p. 121-158. have been adapting a series of measures to support family caregivers, such as cash benefits, tax exemptions, and forms of legal protection for male and female workers who need flexible hours or ways of working because they are caregivers; integration of social and health services in hospitals, primary care teams, long-term care providers, and professional associations. A growing investment in policies for the innovative use of technologies to improve competence and care is observed.
All the countries of the Bloc are equipped with laws regulating actions whose costs are shared by local administrations, which, in turn, provide the services. For this very reason, operational effectiveness differs widely between and within countries. In general, there is a combination and sharing of social and health care in different policy models2929 Unión Europea (UE). Consejo de Europa. Retos de la política social en las sociedades europeas que envejecen. Bruselas: Comisión Europea; 2003. (Recomendación 1591).,3333 Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1990.,3434 Pasinato MTM, Kornis GM. A inserção dos cuidados de longa duração para idosos no âmbito dos sistemas de seguridade social: experiência internacional In: Camarano AA, organizadora. Cuidados de Longa Duração para a População Idosa: um novo risco social a ser assumido. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA; 2010. p. 40-66..
Actions in some selected countries are described here: Scandinavians, because they offer the most universal and inclusive policies; Germany, because it represents a group of conservative states with corporate systems; Spain, as it is culturally closer to Brazil. Then, we comment on the current movements of Canada and the U.S., which are in the process of institutionalizing3535 Peters BG. Institutional theory in Political Science: the new institutionalism. Northampton: Edgar Elgar Publishing; 2019. their models.
Scandinavian countries’ protection system is the most universal and organized. The State, through the work of social and health services, is responsible for dependent older adults in their homes or other institutions, allowing relatives, if they so wish, to remain active in the labor market. In comparative terms, these countries are, among Europeans, those that offer the highest proportion of home help. Local authorities have broad responsibility for financing, planning, providing services, and providing financial contributions to relatives. Nobody is left without care, but there is ample freedom to accept or not the support of the public service. Currently, according to Johansson and Sundström3636 Johansson L, Sundström G. Policies and practices in support of family cargivers: filial obligations redefined in Sweden. Journal of Aging & Social Policy 2006; 18(3/4):7-26. and Larsson et al.3737 Larsson K, Thorslund MM, Kaewholt II. Are public care and services for older people targeted according to need? Applying the Behavioural Model on longitudinal data of a Swedish urban older population. Eur J Ageing 2006; 3(1):22-33., although it remains solidly anchored in the public service, the combination of family care, governmental organizations, and, more recently, the private initiative in the provision of care is observed. However, the State’s responsibility is firm and definitive.
Germany stands out among those that offer a conservative-corporate model3333 Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1990.. In that country, recognizing the individual right to protect dependence predominates, without looking at the beneficiary’s financial condition. However, support services for caregivers are provided mainly by private, non-profit institutions. Public administrations only intervene when there is no provision from these associations. Families can choose to receive support services at home or cash grants, and the latter option prevails. Grants’ value varies according to the intensity of the officially recognized dependence. Caregivers are also allowed to take vacations, receiving incentives to do so. All inputs to older adults and caregivers stem from Social Security contributions or public subsidies3838 Pavalko EK, Henderson KA. Combining care work and paid work. Do marketplace policies make a difference. Research on Aging 2006; 28(3):359-375.
39 Mason AH, Spilsbury H, Harksey H, Golder S, Adamson J, Drummond M, Glendinning C. A systhematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different models of community-based respite care for frail older people and their carers. Health Technol Assessment 2007; 15(11):11-57.-4040 Keck W, Saraceno C. Caring for a parent while working for pay in the German welfare regime. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life 2010; 5(1):107-138..
Spain has a strong presence of social insurance and contributory benefits proportional to the salary. However, the protection given to older adults and dependents, in general, is marked by the strong presence of the family, civil society institutions, and a free universal health system organized regionally and locally. Social care is mainly geared to people with insufficient resources, leaving out the middle class, resulting in critical regional deficits and imbalances4141 Rodriguez P. El apoyo informal en la provisión de cuidados a las personas con dependencias. Madrid: Forum de Políticas Feministas; 2004.. At the local level, sponsored by regions or provinces, various forms of support are offered to informal caregivers: in most cases, social work provides a person to relieve the workday of those providing care; in some provinces, the government offers cash assistance to cover the extra expenses for assistance to older adults; and technological devices have been introduced, particularly for monitoring the most fragile older adults and support in emergencies; most locations offer day centers; and there are some innovative initiatives, such as the program called “food on wheels”, which produces and distributes scheduled meals to those who live alone, are sick, with little autonomy, relieving them or caregivers from the task of preparing meals1616 Ministerio de Salud. Atención a las personas em situación de dependencia en España: Libro Blanco. Madrid: MS; 2004.,4242 Gomez-Allende M. El envejecimiento en España: demandas sociales, programas y servicios de atención, las pensiones y los cuidados a las personas dependientes. Madrid: GPS; 2004..
In Canada, home care for older adults is the subject of government action and activism by caregiver associations that claim tax exemptions and pension plans for those who stop working to care for dependent people. The government and society started to consider informal caregivers vital to the health system, as they provide 80% of all home care and 30% for those living in institutions4343 Special Senate Committee on Aging. Canada's Aging Population: Seizing the Opportunity. [Final report]. Otawa: The Special Senate Committee on Aging; 2009. [cited 2020 Mar 06]. Available from: https://sencanada.ca/content/sen/Committee/402/agei/rep/AgingFinalReport-e.pdf
44 Sinha M. Results from General Social Survey: Portrait of Caregivers [serial on the Internet].Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2013. [cited 2020 Mar 15]. Available from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-652-x/89-652-x2013001-eng.pdf
45 Goodhead A, McDonald J, National Advisory Committee on Health and Disability, Health Services Research Centre (N.Z.). Informal caregivers literature review. A report prepared for the National Health Committee. New Zealand: Health Services Research Centre; 2007.-4646 MacAdam M. Frameworks of integrated care for the elderly: A systematic review. Ontario: Canadian Policy Research Networks; 2008.. The way to serve them is part of federal policy guidelines, but their application varies across 14 jurisdictions. Today, in ten of these provinces, those in need of care receive a living allowance and are free to choose the services and the person to assist them. However, only three of them allow caregivers to use this money to remunerate the caregiver. The Special Commission on Aging4747 Canadian Institute for Health Information. Supporting informal caregivers - the heart of home care. Ottawa: CIHI; 2010. emphasizes that social class is an essential factor in informal caregivers’ quality of life in Canada. Those who can pay are always looking for external help, often underpaid, offered by immigrant women2121 Cangiano A, Shutes I, Spencer S, Leeson G. Migrant care workers in ageing societies. Oxford: University of Oxford; 2009. (Report on Research in the United Kingdom. COMPAS).,4747 Canadian Institute for Health Information. Supporting informal caregivers - the heart of home care. Ottawa: CIHI; 2010.. The estimated cost of unpaid work of informal caregivers amounts to three billion dollars/year.
The United States recently enacted Law N° 115-119 of 2018, known as the “RAISE Family Caregivers Act”4848 United States of America. Public Law nº. 115-119 de 2018. RAISE - Family Caregivers Act''. Public Law 115-119 2018; 22 Jan., which consists of “recognizing, assisting, including, supporting and engaging family caregivers”. The law mandates that the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) develop and maintain a strategy that addresses the 43 million informal caregivers who help dependent people without remuneration. It also created an Advisory Board to make it possible. It includes civil servants, representation associations, dependent older adults, and caregivers. Its guidelines are: (1) comprehensive health and long-term care promotion; (2) care centered on the person and family, with a focus on the patient and those providing care, also including them in the planning and evaluation of the services provided; (3) caregiver information and education; (4) financial security of those providing care and receiving care.
According to the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP)4949 Association of Retired Pearsons (AARP). [site]. AARP: California; 2020. [cited 2020 Mar 06]. Available from: www.aarp.org.br, the 43 million family caregivers in the U.S. provide 34 billion hours of care/year, estimated at US$ 470 billion dollars55 Feinberg L, Reinhard SC, Houser A, Choula R. Valuing the invaluable: The growing contributions and costs of family caregiving. Washington: AARP Public Policy Institute; 2011.. A strong presence of civil society organizations is observed in American society’s engagement, not only in the provision of services but also in addressing the claims. The liberal state moves forward through these entities. Among other actions, an association called “National Alliance for Caregiving”5050 United States of America (USA). National Alliance for Caregiving in the USA. Westpoint: MMMI; 2009. ranks the best and worst American states for dependent older adults, encouraging good practices. The promotion of several initiatives has been following the “Family and Medical Leave Act”5151 United States of America (USA). Public Law nº. 103-3 de 1993. Congress Family and Medical Leave Act. Pubic Law 103-3 1993; 05 Feb., which has been in effect since 1993 (Clinton administration), which aims to make working hours more flexible and protecting workers when their absence from work occurs for a certain period to promote care. Next are the “Family Caregiver Support Program” created in 20005252 Unites States of America. Family Caregiver Support Program. San Francisco: Family Caregiver Alliance; 2000., which provides a support fund for caregivers, and the “Lifespan Respite Care Act”5353 Unites States of America. Public Law nº.109-442. Lifespam Respire Act. 2006, Public Law nº.109-442 2006; 21 Dez., which promotes care for the families of older adults, helping them with the services and costs of care. Currently, the civil society movement pushes the government towards a Social Security reform that benefits family caregivers who must leave their jobs to take on the responsibility of assisting older adults, losing substantial benefits and retirement pensions. It is also essential to cite innovative initiatives of family-centered care models that involve various professional services, as is the case in Minnesota5454 Kane RA, Cutler L. Aligning transformed nursing-home environment with staff practices and organizational policies to yield resident benefits from small-house nursing homes. Seniors Housing and Care Journal 2017; 25(1).
55 Buttke D, Cooke V, Abrahamson K, Shippee T, Davila H, Kane RA, Arling G. A statewide Model for Assisting Nursing home Residents to Transition Successfully to the Community. Geriatrics 2018; 3(2):18.
56 Singer GHS, Biegel DE, Athridge BL. Trends impacting public policy support for caregiving families. Journal of family social work 2010; 13(3):191-207.-5757 ARCH. Lifespam Respite Task Force. National Respite Coalition. [site]. Oxford: ARCH; 2006. [cited 2020 Mar 06]. Available from: https://archrespite.org/national-respite-coalition/lifespan-respite-task-force.
What protection and support initiatives are there for family caregivers in Brazil? Unfortunately, a total absence is observed from the viewpoint of an institutionalized public policy. The empirical work carried out by the researchers with several papers in this thematic edition found: (1) a lack of awareness of this social group that they are entitled to social and health protection, (2) no associative and claiming movement; (3) specific and intermittent support from some primary care units that go to homes, which is noted and appreciated by families; and (3) some local initiatives led by health institutions and universities that have been mobilizing themselves with specific and experimental programs to support caregivers5858 Maria Cecília de Souza Minayo, 2020, "Manual de Pesquisa Estudo Situacional dos Idosos Dependentes que residem com suas Famílias", https://doi.org/10.48331/scielodata.8NEDAK
https://doi.org/10.48331/scielodata.8NED... . However, these proposals do not have the most resilient aspects of institutionalization: processes, structures, proposed actions with rules and routines, and guidelines for their effectiveness3535 Peters BG. Institutional theory in Political Science: the new institutionalism. Northampton: Edgar Elgar Publishing; 2019.. Not even a movement (process) that reflects the will of caregivers, social pressure and commitment from the State has been identified.
Some considerations about the analyzed literature
It should be noted that one of the main limitations of this work is the random choice of the narrated cases, which mainly observed the strategic nature of this paper that aimed to highlight the possible courses, established or under construction, in order to have an effective policy for family caregivers. In this sense, some proposals are summarized.
Rodiguez4141 Rodriguez P. El apoyo informal en la provisión de cuidados a las personas con dependencias. Madrid: Forum de Políticas Feministas; 2004. summarizes his vision of the support that caregivers need in three categories: emotional help that reinforces their sense of belonging and self-esteem; information to help them face difficulties; and instrumental support in the tasks they have to perform.
U.S. Lifespan Respite Task Force5656 Singer GHS, Biegel DE, Athridge BL. Trends impacting public policy support for caregiving families. Journal of family social work 2010; 13(3):191-207. listened to more than 150 family caregiver groups. Their demands are more or less similar: (1) to receive a monthly credit to cover expenses that increase with the maintenance of older adults and a voucher that partially rewards them for the care hours they provided; (2) to have a support program that allows them to have scheduled rest, relief from work hours, and vacation time; (3) to have a shuttle service to take their loved ones to the hospital, on a walk, or anywhere else, when necessary5757 ARCH. Lifespam Respite Task Force. National Respite Coalition. [site]. Oxford: ARCH; 2006. [cited 2020 Mar 06]. Available from: https://archrespite.org/national-respite-coalition/lifespan-respite-task-force.
In Canada, studies by the Health Council5959 Health Council of Canada. Seniors in need, caregivers in distress: what are the home care priorities for seniors in Canada? Toronto: Health Council of Canada; 2012. follow the same direction. Research by McNamara and Rosenwax77 McNamara B, Rosenwax L. Which carers of family members at the end of life need more support from health services and why? Soc Sci Med 2010; 70(7):1035-1041. and a review by Silva et al.66 Silva AL, Teixeira HJ, Teixeira MJC, Freitas S. The needs of informal caregivers of elderly people living at home: an integrative review. Scand J Caring Sci 2013; 27(4):792-803. complete this first survey: (1) to obtain accurate information about the diagnosis of the person they care for; (2) to receive training to act correctly in the provision of care; (3) to have adequate support from health and social assistance professionals, and effective communication channels with them; (4) to have legal and financial support during the time they provide care and also after the loved one dies, so that, if applicable, they can reintegrate into the world of work.
Government responses to the needs of dependent older adults in countries with protection systems are still very insufficient and have gaps. Some of the many causes are: (1) First, there is no social place for these actors, except within the family, where they confine themselves, although a current trend (which has not yet become an action) to integrate family caregivers as PHC’s first level of care is observed. (2) Several analysts recognize that the development of laws, regulations, finance, organizational reforms, and the use of technologies has been poorly comprehensive, inorganic, and unsystematic. (3) Although the understanding of the family’s valuable service to the dependent older adults has primarily increased, a strong cultural component assigns women the responsibility to care voluntarily and free of charge. (4) This cultural component has the aggravation of silencing and invisibility under which caregivers work. (4) Finally, from the State’s viewpoint, the contemporary trend towards dehospitalization and deinstitutionalization combines a lot with older adults’ desire to be cared for at home, but this burden is not credited to families. (5) For all these reasons, it is necessary to look at the problems and challenges in their micro and macro-social aspects simultaneously33 European Association Working For Carers. Carers in Europe. [document in Internet]. 2020 Fev. [cited 2020 Fev 23]:[about 8 p.]. Available from: http://www.eurocarers.org/userfiles/file/Factsheet 2009.pd
http://www.eurocarers.org/userfiles/file... ,55 Feinberg L, Reinhard SC, Houser A, Choula R. Valuing the invaluable: The growing contributions and costs of family caregiving. Washington: AARP Public Policy Institute; 2011.,99 Oxfam. Relatório sobre nós e a desigualdade "tempo de cuidar". Fórum Econômico Mundial de 2020, Davos. [documento da Internet]. 2020 Jan. [acessado 2020 Jan. 31]. Disponível em: https://oxfam.org.br/justica-social-e-economica/forum-economico-de-davos/tempo-de-cuidar/
https://oxfam.org.br/justica-social-e-ec... ,3535 Peters BG. Institutional theory in Political Science: the new institutionalism. Northampton: Edgar Elgar Publishing; 2019..
A fundamental step in favor of rights and justice for relatives who provide care to older adults is the development of national care systems, with civil society’s full participation. In particular, the inclusion of groups and movements that advocate women’s rights. Oxfam’s proposal99 Oxfam. Relatório sobre nós e a desigualdade "tempo de cuidar". Fórum Econômico Mundial de 2020, Davos. [documento da Internet]. 2020 Jan. [acessado 2020 Jan. 31]. Disponível em: https://oxfam.org.br/justica-social-e-economica/forum-economico-de-davos/tempo-de-cuidar/
https://oxfam.org.br/justica-social-e-ec... is to proceed with an integrated care work redistribution with a comprehensive approach to redistributive policies to narrow the gap between rich and poor, men and women.
Over the past few decades, feminist economists, civil society, and care advocates have proposed solutions to radically redefine the priority of this type of work, creating a transformative framework from what they called “4R”99 Oxfam. Relatório sobre nós e a desigualdade "tempo de cuidar". Fórum Econômico Mundial de 2020, Davos. [documento da Internet]. 2020 Jan. [acessado 2020 Jan. 31]. Disponível em: https://oxfam.org.br/justica-social-e-economica/forum-economico-de-davos/tempo-de-cuidar/
https://oxfam.org.br/justica-social-e-ec... : (1) recognition of the work of unpaid and poorly paid care, performed mainly by women and girls, as a production with real value; (2) reduction in the number of hours dedicated to unpaid care tasks, through access to quality, time-saving equipment requiring less support infrastructure; (3) redistribution of unpaid care more fairly within the family, requiring responsibility from the State and civil society in this matter; (4) active representation of caregivers in the formulation and implementation of policies, services, and systems that affect their lives.
This text ends with a brief consideration on the Brazilian situation. The 1988 Constitution, the National Policy for Older Adults3131 Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA). RDC no. 283, de 26 de setembro de 2005. [documento na Internet]. 2005 [acessado 2020 Mar 16]; [cerca de 4 p.]. Disponível em: www.portalsaude.gov.br.
www.portalsaude.gov.br... , and the Statute of Older Adults6060 Brasil. Lei nº 10.741 de 01 de Outubro de 2003. Dispõe sobre o Estatuto do Idoso e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União 2003; 03 out. consider that family, governments, and society must support this social group. State laws and measures aim to protect older adults, provide subsidies that guarantee their community participation, defend their dignity, care for their well-being, and ensure their right to life.
However, although the State provides some essential health services, care coverage is insufficient, especially concerning informal caregivers. Due to the lack of financial resources that allow recruiting specialized people, care is usually provided by a relative, mostly women or domestic workers who add care to all other functions they perform in the home. The Brazilian State’s participation concerning the dependent person is not specific and disappears amid the routine practices of social and health services. It is not comparable to the burden of care, medicines, supplies, and other expenses left to families. No specific initiative in the country benefits family caregivers, while the percentages of older adults over 80 are on the rise. There is an urgent need to promote a clear policy to protect older adults, care providers who take care of them, and value the dignity that longevity in the country requires, without discrimination of class, gender, race, color, and health conditions.
References
- 1Gaymu J, Ekamper O, Beets G. Who will be caring for Europe's dependent elders in 2030? Sociologie and Culture 2007; 62(4):675-706.
- 2Hoff A. Current and future challenges of family care in the UK. London: Government Office of Science; 2015.
- 3European Association Working For Carers. Carers in Europe. [document in Internet]. 2020 Fev. [cited 2020 Fev 23]:[about 8 p.]. Available from: http://www.eurocarers.org/userfiles/file/Factsheet 2009.pd
» http://www.eurocarers.org/userfiles/file/Factsheet 2009.pd - 4Glendinning C, Arksey H, Tjadens F. Care provision within families and its socio-economic impact on care providers: Report for the European Commission SPRU, York: University of York; 2009.
- 5Feinberg L, Reinhard SC, Houser A, Choula R. Valuing the invaluable: The growing contributions and costs of family caregiving. Washington: AARP Public Policy Institute; 2011.
- 6Silva AL, Teixeira HJ, Teixeira MJC, Freitas S. The needs of informal caregivers of elderly people living at home: an integrative review. Scand J Caring Sci 2013; 27(4):792-803.
- 7McNamara B, Rosenwax L. Which carers of family members at the end of life need more support from health services and why? Soc Sci Med 2010; 70(7):1035-1041.
- 8Organization of Economic Development (OCDE).Policies to support family cargivers. IV chapter. In: Organization of Economic Development (OCDE). Help wanted? Providing and paying for long term care. OCDE Publishing: Paris; 2011. p. 121-158.
- 9Oxfam. Relatório sobre nós e a desigualdade "tempo de cuidar". Fórum Econômico Mundial de 2020, Davos. [documento da Internet]. 2020 Jan. [acessado 2020 Jan. 31]. Disponível em: https://oxfam.org.br/justica-social-e-economica/forum-economico-de-davos/tempo-de-cuidar/
» https://oxfam.org.br/justica-social-e-economica/forum-economico-de-davos/tempo-de-cuidar - 10Research Institute of Crédit Suisse. The Global wealth report 2019. [document on the Internet]. 2020 Fev [cited 2020 Fev 07]: [about 2 p.]. Available from: https://www.credit-suisse.com/about-us/en/reports-research/global-wealth-report.html
» https://www.credit-suisse.com/about-us/en/reports-research/global-wealth-report.html - 11Organização Panamericana de Saúde (OPAS). Plano de ação para a saúde da população idosa. 2020. Washington: OPAS; 2015.
- 12Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios 2008: Um Panorama da Saúde no Brasil. Acesso e utilização dos serviços, condições de saúde e fatores de risco e proteção à saúde 2008. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, MS, MPOG, Fiocruz; 2010.
- 13Bandeira L, Melo HP, Pinheiro LS. Mulheres em dados: o que informa a PNAD/IBGE 2008. Revista do Observatório Brasil da Igualdade de Gênero 2010; (7):107-119.
- 14Vasconcelos M. Responsabilidades familiares. Secretaria Especial de Políticas para as Mulheres. Revista do Observatório Brasil da Igualdade de Gênero 9;(1):36-43.
- 15Kuchemann BA. Envelhecimento populacional, cuidado e cidadania: velhos dilemas e novos desafios. Soc Estado 2012; 27(1):165-180.
- 16Ministerio de Salud. Atención a las personas em situación de dependencia en España: Libro Blanco. Madrid: MS; 2004.
- 17Alcântara AO, Camarano AA, Giacomin KC. Política Nacional do Idoso: velhas e novas questões. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA; 2016.
- 18Lima-Costa MF, Peixoto SV, Malta DC, Szwarcwald CL, Mambrini JVM. Cuidado informal e remunerado aos idosos no Brasil. Rev Saude Publica 2017; 51:6s.
- 19Baltes PB, Smith J. Novas Fronteiras para o futuro do envelhecimento: a velhice bem-sucedida do idoso jovem aos dilemas da Quarta Idade. A Terceira Idade 2006; 7(36):7-31.
- 20Minayo MCS. O imperativo de cuidar da pessoa idosa dependente. Cien Saude Colet 2019; 24(1):247-252.
- 21Cangiano A, Shutes I, Spencer S, Leeson G. Migrant care workers in ageing societies. Oxford: University of Oxford; 2009. (Report on Research in the United Kingdom. COMPAS).
- 22Karsch UM. Idosos dependentes: famílias e cuidadores. Cad Saude Publica 2003; 19(3):861-866.
- 23Houser A, Gibson MJ. Valuing the invaluable: the economic value of family caregiving. AARP Policy Institute 2008; 13(3):1-30.
- 24Eales J, Kim C, Fast J. A snapshot of Canadians caring for persons with dementia: the toll it takes. Edmonton: University of Alberta Research on Aging, Policies and Practice; 2015.
- 25Wolfe KKN, Gibson MJ. Listening to Family Caregivers: The Need to Include Family Caregiver Assessment in Medicaid Home and Community-Based Service Waiver Programs. Washington: AARP Public Policy Institute; 2013.
- 26World Health Organization (WHO). World Report on Ageing and Health. Gèneve: WHO; 2015.
- 27Moraes CL, Apratto Junior PC, Reichenheim ME. Rompendo o silêncio e suas barreiras: um inquérito domiciliar sobre a violência doméstica contra idosos em área de abrangência do Programa Médico de Família de Niterói, RJ, Brasil. Cad Saude Publica 2008; 24(10):2289-2300.
- 28Apratto Júnior PC. A violência doméstica contra idosos nas áreas de abrangência do Programa Saúde da Família de Niterói (RJ, Brasil). Cien Saude Colet 2010; 15(6):2983-2995.
- 29Unión Europea (UE). Consejo de Europa. Retos de la política social en las sociedades europeas que envejecen. Bruselas: Comisión Europea; 2003. (Recomendación 1591).
- 30Brasil. Lei nº 8.842 de 5 de Janeiro de 1994. Dispõe sobre Política Nacional do Idoso, cria o Conselho Nacional o Idoso e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União 1994; 05 Jan.
- 31Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA). RDC no. 283, de 26 de setembro de 2005. [documento na Internet]. 2005 [acessado 2020 Mar 16]; [cerca de 4 p.]. Disponível em: www.portalsaude.gov.br
» www.portalsaude.gov.br - 32Lima-Costa MF, Manbrini JVM, Peixoto SV, Malta DC, Macinko J. Socioeconomic inequalities in activities of daily living limitations and in the provision of informal and formal care for non institutionalized older Brazilians: National Health Survey, 2013. Int J Equity Health 2016; 15(1):137-145.
- 33Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1990.
- 34Pasinato MTM, Kornis GM. A inserção dos cuidados de longa duração para idosos no âmbito dos sistemas de seguridade social: experiência internacional In: Camarano AA, organizadora. Cuidados de Longa Duração para a População Idosa: um novo risco social a ser assumido. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA; 2010. p. 40-66.
- 35Peters BG. Institutional theory in Political Science: the new institutionalism. Northampton: Edgar Elgar Publishing; 2019.
- 36Johansson L, Sundström G. Policies and practices in support of family cargivers: filial obligations redefined in Sweden. Journal of Aging & Social Policy 2006; 18(3/4):7-26.
- 37Larsson K, Thorslund MM, Kaewholt II. Are public care and services for older people targeted according to need? Applying the Behavioural Model on longitudinal data of a Swedish urban older population. Eur J Ageing 2006; 3(1):22-33.
- 38Pavalko EK, Henderson KA. Combining care work and paid work. Do marketplace policies make a difference. Research on Aging 2006; 28(3):359-375.
- 39Mason AH, Spilsbury H, Harksey H, Golder S, Adamson J, Drummond M, Glendinning C. A systhematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different models of community-based respite care for frail older people and their carers. Health Technol Assessment 2007; 15(11):11-57.
- 40Keck W, Saraceno C. Caring for a parent while working for pay in the German welfare regime. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life 2010; 5(1):107-138.
- 41Rodriguez P. El apoyo informal en la provisión de cuidados a las personas con dependencias. Madrid: Forum de Políticas Feministas; 2004.
- 42Gomez-Allende M. El envejecimiento en España: demandas sociales, programas y servicios de atención, las pensiones y los cuidados a las personas dependientes. Madrid: GPS; 2004.
- 43Special Senate Committee on Aging. Canada's Aging Population: Seizing the Opportunity. [Final report]. Otawa: The Special Senate Committee on Aging; 2009. [cited 2020 Mar 06]. Available from: https://sencanada.ca/content/sen/Committee/402/agei/rep/AgingFinalReport-e.pdf
- 44Sinha M. Results from General Social Survey: Portrait of Caregivers [serial on the Internet].Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2013. [cited 2020 Mar 15]. Available from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-652-x/89-652-x2013001-eng.pdf
- 45Goodhead A, McDonald J, National Advisory Committee on Health and Disability, Health Services Research Centre (N.Z.). Informal caregivers literature review. A report prepared for the National Health Committee. New Zealand: Health Services Research Centre; 2007.
- 46MacAdam M. Frameworks of integrated care for the elderly: A systematic review. Ontario: Canadian Policy Research Networks; 2008.
- 47Canadian Institute for Health Information. Supporting informal caregivers - the heart of home care. Ottawa: CIHI; 2010.
- 48United States of America. Public Law nº. 115-119 de 2018. RAISE - Family Caregivers Act''. Public Law 115-119 2018; 22 Jan.
- 49Association of Retired Pearsons (AARP). [site]. AARP: California; 2020. [cited 2020 Mar 06]. Available from: www.aarp.org.br
- 50United States of America (USA). National Alliance for Caregiving in the USA. Westpoint: MMMI; 2009.
- 51United States of America (USA). Public Law nº. 103-3 de 1993. Congress Family and Medical Leave Act. Pubic Law 103-3 1993; 05 Feb.
- 52Unites States of America. Family Caregiver Support Program. San Francisco: Family Caregiver Alliance; 2000.
- 53Unites States of America. Public Law nº.109-442. Lifespam Respire Act. 2006, Public Law nº.109-442 2006; 21 Dez.
- 54Kane RA, Cutler L. Aligning transformed nursing-home environment with staff practices and organizational policies to yield resident benefits from small-house nursing homes. Seniors Housing and Care Journal 2017; 25(1).
- 55Buttke D, Cooke V, Abrahamson K, Shippee T, Davila H, Kane RA, Arling G. A statewide Model for Assisting Nursing home Residents to Transition Successfully to the Community. Geriatrics 2018; 3(2):18.
- 56Singer GHS, Biegel DE, Athridge BL. Trends impacting public policy support for caregiving families. Journal of family social work 2010; 13(3):191-207.
- 57ARCH. Lifespam Respite Task Force. National Respite Coalition. [site]. Oxford: ARCH; 2006. [cited 2020 Mar 06]. Available from: https://archrespite.org/national-respite-coalition/lifespan-respite-task-force
- 58Maria Cecília de Souza Minayo, 2020, "Manual de Pesquisa Estudo Situacional dos Idosos Dependentes que residem com suas Famílias", https://doi.org/10.48331/scielodata.8NEDAK
» https://doi.org/10.48331/scielodata.8NEDAK - 59Health Council of Canada. Seniors in need, caregivers in distress: what are the home care priorities for seniors in Canada? Toronto: Health Council of Canada; 2012.
- 60Brasil. Lei nº 10.741 de 01 de Outubro de 2003. Dispõe sobre o Estatuto do Idoso e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União 2003; 03 out.
Publication Dates
- Publication in this collection
25 Jan 2021 - Date of issue
Jan 2021
History
- Received
04 May 2020 - Accepted
25 Aug 2020 - Published
27 Aug 2020