Quality of life and work engagement among nursing staff at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic

Taisa Moitinho de Carvalho Luciano Garcia Lourenção Maria Helena Pinto Renata Andrea Pietro Pereira Viana Ana Maria Batista da Silva Gonçalves Moreira Leticia Pepineli de Mello Gilney Guerra de Medeiros Antonio Marcos Freire Gomes About the authors

Abstract

This article investigates the correlation between work engagement and work-related quality of life among nursing staff at a public hospital in São Paulo State, at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. A descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional study of nursing personnel was conducted from December 2020 to January 2021, using the Brazilian versions of the Work & Well-being Survey (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale - UWES) and the Work-related Quality of Life (WRQoL) scale, following Walton’s model. Nursing staffs returned a strong positive correlation (r≥0.70) between the social integration domain of the WRQoL and the vigour dimension of the UWES (r=0.88; p=<0.001); a moderate positive correlation (r≥0.40≤0.69) between working conditions (WRQOL) and the vigour (r=0.40; p<0.001), dedication (r=0.40; p<0.001) and overall score (r=0.41; p<0.001) dimensions of the UWES. Correlations were positive and weak (r≤0.39) for the other WRQoL domains and the UWES dimensions. It was concluded that personnel with satisfactory levels of quality of life tend to show higher levels of engagement at work. At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, nursing professionals were strongly engaged and satisfied with their work-related quality of life.

Key words:
Work Engagement; Job Satisfaction; Quality of Life; Workers’ Health; Nursing Staff

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic raised major concerns as to the physical and mental health of nursing staffs, due to the overwork entailed by increasing hospital admissions. Extended working hours led to physical and mental fatigue. Added to which, concerns over exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the chance of infecting relatives, the risk of shortfalls in safety equipment and difficulties resulting from increased absenteeism further exacerbated these workers’ precarious working conditions11 Azevedo JNL, Silva RF, Macêdo TTS. Principais causas de absenteísmo na equipe de enfermagem: revisão bibliográfica. Rev Enferm Contemp 2019; 8(1):80-86.

2 Kunrath GM, Santarem MD, Oliveira JLC, Machado MLP, Camargo MP, Rosa NG, Almeida VM, Vieira LB. Predictors associated with absenteeism-disease among Nursing professionals working in an emergency hospital service. Rev Gaucha Enferm 2021; 42:e20190433.

3 Dal'Bosco EB, Floriano LSM, Skupien SV, Arcaro G, Martins AR, Anselmo ACC. Mental health of nursing in coping with COVID-19 at a regional university hospital. Rev Bras Enferm 2020; 73(Supl. 2):e20200434.
-44 Teixeira CFS, Soares CM, Souza EA, Lisboa ES, Pinto ICM, Andrade LR, Espiridião MA. The health of healthcare professionals coping with the Covid-19 pandemic. Cien Saude Colet 2020; 25(9):3465-3474..

This scenario further increased nursing leaders’ responsibility for developing strategies to help increase team engagement, ensure sustainable performance and guarantee safe, quality care. In that context, these professionals faced a window of opportunity for making a difference in health institutions, showing the positive impact of deploying leadership skills and bringing change55 Van Kraaij J, Van Oostveen C, Vermeulen H, Heinen M, Huis A, Adriaansen M, Peters J. Nurse practitioners' perceptions of their ability to enact leadership in hospital care. J Clin Nurs 2020; 29(3-4):447-458..

Work engagement is defined as a positive, rewarding work-related mental state, involving worker satisfaction with the job and a feeling of well-being. It is characterised by high levels of energy and resilience (vigour), strong identification with the job, a sense of significance, enthusiasm, inspiration, pride and challenge (dedication), all of which generates positive job-related emotions and good job performance among workers, causing a sense of belonging, satisfaction and duty done (absorption)66 Rotta DS, Lourenção LG, Gonsalez EG, Teixeira PR, Gazetta CE, Pinto MH. Engagement of multi-professional residents in health. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2019; 53:e03437.

7 Remegio W, Rivera RR, Griffin MQ, Fitzpatrick JJ. The Professional Quality of Life and Work Engagement of Nurse Leaders. Nurse Lead 2021;19(1):95-100.
-88 Magnan ES, Vazquez ACS, Pacico JC, Hutz CS. Normatização da versão Brasileira da Escala Utrecht de Engajamento no Trabalho. Aval Psicol 2016; 15(2):133-140.. According to the literature, the higher the level of nursing staffs’ work engagement, the higher the quality of care provided by the teams. Nursing managers are essential to promoting work engagement among team members99 Oliveira RS. O papel do gestor na maximização da produtividade no meio ambiente do trabalho [tcc]. Marília: Centro Universitário Eurípides de Marília; 2016..

Working conditions, work environment and overwork are factors that lead to emotional burnout in workers, which can influence their quality of life adversely. Accordingly, quality of life studies are gaining importance in organisations, given the need to understand the factors that influence workers’ lives positively in their professional and personal relationships1010 Wong IA, Wan YKP, Gao JH. How to attract and retain Generation Y employees? An exploration of career choice and the meaning of work. Tour Manag Perspect 2017; 23:140-150.

11 Gonsalez EG, Lourenção LG, Teixeira PR, Rotta DS, Gazetta CE, Beretta D, Pinto MH. Work engagement in employees at professional improvement programs in health. Cad Bras Ter Ocup 2017; 25(3):509-517.
-1212 Wang X, Liu L, Zou F, Hao J, Wu H. Associations of Occupational Stressors, Perceived Organizational Support, and Psychological Capital with Work Engagement among Chinese Female Nurses. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017:5284628..

Work-related quality of life (WRQoL) is directly related to job satisfaction, work environment hygiene, physical safety, mental health and well-being, interpersonal relationships, management and leadership style, ergonomics applied to machine use, tools and concern for workers’ health1212 Wang X, Liu L, Zou F, Hao J, Wu H. Associations of Occupational Stressors, Perceived Organizational Support, and Psychological Capital with Work Engagement among Chinese Female Nurses. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017:5284628.

13 Moloney W, Fieldes J, Jacobs S. An Integrative Review of How Healthcare Organizations Can Support Hospital Nurses to Thrive at Work. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(23):8757.
-1414 Nazario M, Klimeck KA. Qualidade de vida e engajamento no trabalho: Uma análise em uma cooperativa de assistência à saúde. Rev Gestao Org Coop 2016; 3(5):43-56..

As work engagement can influence WRQoL77 Remegio W, Rivera RR, Griffin MQ, Fitzpatrick JJ. The Professional Quality of Life and Work Engagement of Nurse Leaders. Nurse Lead 2021;19(1):95-100., it is important to know levels of work engagement and WRQoL among nursing professionals, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study will thus help to understand better their behaviour at a time of great uncertainty and challenges. It will also produce knowledge to inform to implementation of measures to improve nursing staffs’ performance during the pandemic by positively impacting their commitment and the quality of care, thus reducing staff turnover and related costs.

Accordingly, this study investigated the correlation between work engagement and work-related quality of life among nursing personnel at a public hospital in São Paulo state at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

This descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional study was conducted in December 2020 and January 2021 with nursing personnel at a medium-sized philanthropic general hospital (210 beds) in São Paulo state, a referral hospital for the population of approximately 450,000 of the 18 municipalities that make up the 5th Regional Health Directorate of São Paulo State and the only hospital in the region that handles high-complexity procedures, high-risk pregnancies, neurosurgery, orthopaedics, nephrology, cardiovascular surgery and interventional cardiology procedures. The hospital has 30 adult intensive care beds and 10 neonatal and paediatric intensive care beds. Of the care provided there, 85% is for patients in Brail’s public Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS).

The study population comprised 606 nursing personnel at the hospital (145 nurses, 414 nursing technicians and 47 nursing auxiliaries) and excluded personnel of an outsourced sector occupying part of the hospital’s physical structure and operating under external managers.

Sample calculation estimated a sample of 284 participants, to a 95% confidence level, 5% margin of error, 95% reliability and 20% addition for losses. Sampling was by convenience. All 606 personnel eligible for inclusion in the study were invited to respond to the questionnaires. Of these, 362 (59.7%) agreed to participate in the study; the other 244 (36.8%) did not respond to the invitation. Incomplete questionnaires were excluded from the sample, which ultimately numbered 341 nursing personnel (56.3% of the study population), comprising 93 nurses, 217 nursing technicians, 27 nursing auxiliaries and four participants of unspecified job category.

Data were collected using three self-applicable instruments provided through the Electronic Research Data Capture (REDCap) platform within the criteria established by Brazil’s General Data Protection Law, namely:

(a) one instrument prepared by the authors, containing sociodemographic variables and participants’ particulars, including: gender, age, marital status, children, education, time since graduation, means of transport used and travel time to work, position and time at the hospital.

(b) the Brazilian version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES), adapted and validated by Vazques et al.1515 Vazquez ACS, Magnan EDS, Pacico JC, Hutz CS, Schaufeli WB. Adaptation and Validation of the Brazilian Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Psico USF 2015; 20(2):207-217.. The UWES consists of 17 questions to assess job satisfaction, considering three aspects of work engagement: vigour (six questions), constituted by high levels of energy and resilience, willingness to invest effort, not tiring easily and persistence in dealing with difficulties; dedication (five questions), comprising feeling enthusiasm and pride in the work, which brings inspiration and meaning; and absorption (six questions), which consists in being totally immersed in the job, finding it difficult to detach from it, time passing quickly and workers’ forgetting everything around them1515 Vazquez ACS, Magnan EDS, Pacico JC, Hutz CS, Schaufeli WB. Adaptation and Validation of the Brazilian Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Psico USF 2015; 20(2):207-217.. Responses to the UWES scale questions are scored on a seven-point Likert scale, where: 0 = never; 1 = almost never; 2 = at times; 3 = regularly; 4 = frequently; 5 = almost always; 6 = always. Scores are calculated as the arithmetic average of responses in each dimension, which ranges from zero to six1111 Gonsalez EG, Lourenção LG, Teixeira PR, Rotta DS, Gazetta CE, Beretta D, Pinto MH. Work engagement in employees at professional improvement programs in health. Cad Bras Ter Ocup 2017; 25(3):509-517..

(c) a version adapted from the Walton model Work-related Quality of Life Assessment Scale validated in Brazil by Timossi et al.1616 Timossi L, Pedroso B, Pilatti L, Francisco A. Walton's model adaptation for quality of work life evaluation. J Phys Educ 2009; 20(3):395-405.. The instrument comprises 32 affirmations distributed across eight domains: Adequate and Fair Compensation (two affirmations), relates to adequate income from the position, which should not deviate from the average salary on the employment market; Safe and Healthy Working Conditions (five affirmations), refers to lawful working hours, premium overtime pay and safe conditions that minimise physical and mental health risks; Immediate Opportunity to Use and Develop Human Capabilities (five affirmations), comprising the conditions offered to employees to develop technical and behavioural skills through feedback, to know the processes of which their work forms part, to plan their activities and have autonomy; Future Opportunity for Continued Growth and Security (four affirmations), requires employee’s to be able to grow and advance in the company; Social Integration in the Work Organisation (four affirmations) requires harmonious personal relationships, fellowship among members of the organisation and freedom from prejudice, inequality and favouritism; Constitutionalism in the Work Organisation (four affirmations), given by employees’ enjoying their rights and freedom of expression, fairness and privacy; Work and the Life Space (three affirmations) relates to how the work impacts employees’ personal, social and family life and ensures conditions for employees to enjoy their free time with their families; and the Social Relevance of Work Life (five affirmations), reflects employees’ views of the company’s social responsibility and its benefits to society1616 Timossi L, Pedroso B, Pilatti L, Francisco A. Walton's model adaptation for quality of work life evaluation. J Phys Educ 2009; 20(3):395-405.. The WRQoL Assessment Scale showed high internal consistency in the validation study in the Brazilian population (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96) and was considered suitable to support work-related quality of life studies in Portuguese1616 Timossi L, Pedroso B, Pilatti L, Francisco A. Walton's model adaptation for quality of work life evaluation. J Phys Educ 2009; 20(3):395-405.. Responses to the WRQoL questionnaire are given on a five-point Likert scale, where: 1 = totally disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = neither disagree nor agree; 4 = agree; and 5 = totally agree. The higher the score, the more satisfied is the respondent (five being the maximum for each criterion examined)1616 Timossi L, Pedroso B, Pilatti L, Francisco A. Walton's model adaptation for quality of work life evaluation. J Phys Educ 2009; 20(3):395-405..

The instruments they were made available electronically on the Electronic Research Data Capture (REDCap) platform, a free electronic data capture software with which research instruments can be developed and offers resources for collaboration, metadata workflow, security, auditing, and export to other statistics programmes1717 Wright A. REDCap: A Tool for the Electronic Capture of Research Data. J Electron Resour Med Libr 2016; 14(4):197-201.. Two trained volunteer nurses assisted the main researcher in data collection. The explanation preceding signing of the Declaration of Consent emphasised that the study involved no conflicts of interest with the hospital administration and that it was an anonymous study. After the consent process, participants were instructed to access the questions by way of a QRCode image, while those who were unable to access the QRCode were forwarded a link via WhatsApp, in which no participant could be identified. Participants had access to the questionnaire after reading and digitally signing the declaration of free and informed consent and thus agreeing to participate in the study. Each block of questions was preceded by the information necessary to answer the questions and the instructions as to the timeframe for answering the questionnaires were made clear.

The collected data were tabulated and analysed using the IBM-SPSS software, version 27.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive measurements (relative and absolute frequencies, means and standard deviations) and inferential measurements (ANOVA and correlation test) were applied. A 5% level of significance was used (p≤0.05) in all calculations.

Work engagement was examined by calculating mean scores for the UWES scale dimensions: overall score (17 questions), vigour (questions 1, 4, 8, 12, 15 and 17), dedication (questions 2,5,7, 10 and 13) and absorption (questions 3, 6, 9, 11, 14 and 16), following the statistical model proposed in the Preliminary Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) Manual1818 Schaufeli W, Bakker A. Escala de Engagement no Trabalho de Utrecht - Manual. Trad. R Agnst, AMT Benevides-Pereira, PC Porto-Martins. Curitiba: GEPEB; 2009.. The mean values were decoded and interpreted following the manual, i.e., 0 to 0.99 = Very low; 1 to 1.99 = Low; 2 to 3.99 = Medium; 4 to 4.99 = High; and 5 to 6 = Very high.

Work-related quality of life was examined by calculating mean scores for the eight domains of the scale. The mean scores obtained on the scale from 1 to 5 were converted to a scale from 0 to 100, enabling quality of life to be classified as: Unsatisfactory (scores from 0 to 24.99), Intermediate (25 to 75) and Satisfactory (75.1 to 100)1616 Timossi L, Pedroso B, Pilatti L, Francisco A. Walton's model adaptation for quality of work life evaluation. J Phys Educ 2009; 20(3):395-405..

The UWES scale dimensions were compared with the participants’ sociodemographic characteristics using the t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA). The correlation between work engagement and work-related quality of life was examined using Pearson’s test of correlation, considering r-values up to 0.39 to indicate weak correlation, values from 0.40 to 0.69, moderate correlation and 0.70 or higher, strong correlation66 Rotta DS, Lourenção LG, Gonsalez EG, Teixeira PR, Gazetta CE, Pinto MH. Engagement of multi-professional residents in health. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2019; 53:e03437..

The study was approved by the research ethics committee in Opinion No. 4,349,861, of 20 October 2020.

Results

The study participants were 341 nursing personnel: 93 (27.3%) nurses, 27 (7.9%) nursing assistants and 217 (63.6%) nursing technicians. Sociodemographic analysis showed that 89.4% were women; 73.3%, from 21 to 40 years old; 49.3%, married or in a stable relationship; 60.4% had children; 29.0% had graduated from one to less than 4 years earlier, and 27.6%, more than 10 years earlier. Most had worked at the institution for less than four years, while 34.9% had worked there from one to less than four years (Table 1).

Table 1
Study participants’ sociodemographic and professional characteristics. Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil, 2021.

As regards work engagement, nursing personnel returned high means for absorption (4.9) and very high means for vigour (5.2), dedication (5.6) and overall score (5.2) (Table 2).

Table 2
Nursing staff’s work engagement. Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil, 2021.

Analysis of work engagement dimensions by sociodemographic variables found no statistically significant difference (p-value>0.05) between scores for work engagement dimensions by gender, marital status, time since graduation or length of service at the hospital (data not shown in Table 3). As in Table 3, nursing assistants showed lower levels of dedication than other professional categories (p=0.037); nursing assistants and technicians showed lower levels of vigour than nurses and nursing managers (p=0.040). Staff aged 51 years and over showed significantly higher levels of dedication (p<0.001) than younger personnel. Staff with children showed higher levels of dedication (p=0.034), vigour (p=0.019) and overall score (p=0.014) than those without children.

Table 3
Work engagement. by participants’ sociodemographic characteristics. Barretos. São Paulo. Brazil. 2021.

Assessment of work-related quality of life found that most nursing personnel enjoyed moderate levels of WRQoL in the Adequate and Fair Compensation domain (51.9%). In the other domains, most staff reported satisfactory levels of WRQoL, particularly in the Social Relevance of Work Life domain, where this level of WRQoL was reported by the highest percentage of staff (76.5%) (Table 4).

Table 4
Distribution of nursing professionals, by work-related quality of work. Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil, 2021.

As shown in Table 5, analysis of the correlation between quality of life and work engagement (Pearson’s correlation test) found a strong, positive correlation (r≥0.70) between WRQoL in the Social Integration in the Work Organisation domain and the vigour dimension of work engagement (r=0.88; p<0.001); a moderate positive correlation (r≥0.40≤0.69) between WRQoL in the Safe and Healthy Working Conditions domain and the vigour (r=0.40; p<0.001), dedication (r=0.40; p<0.001) and overall score (r=0.41; p=<0.001) dimensions of work engagement. In the other WRQoL domains and work engagement dimensions, correlations were positive and weak (Table 5).

Table 5
Relationship between engagement and work-related quality of life among nursing personnel. Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil, 2021.

There was also a tendency for staff with satisfactory quality of life to return higher levels of work engagement. Note, however, that those displaying unsatisfactory levels of Social Integration, Constitutionalism and Social Relevance returned higher levels of work engagement (overall score) and absorption. Staff with unsatisfactory levels in Work and the Life Space showed stronger absorption (Table 5).

Discussion

The sociodemographic profile of nursing staff in this study corroborated other studies and is consistent with the profile of Brazilian nursing personnel, particularly the predominance of nursing technicians and of women1919 Conselho Federal de Enfermagem (Cofen). Enfermagem em números [Internet]. 2022 [acessado 2022 jan 20]. Disponível em: http://www.cofen.gov.br/enfermagem-em-numeros.
http://www.cofen.gov.br/enfermagem-em-nu...

20 Lourenção LG, Silva RAS, Moretti MSR, Sasaki NSGMS, Sodré PC, Gazetta CE. Career commitment and entrenchment among Primary Care nurses. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2021; 55:e20210186.

21 Julio RS, Lourenção LG, Penha JGM, Oliveira AMN, Nascimento VF, Oliveira SM, Gazetta CE. Anxiety, depression, and work engagement in Primary Health Care nursing professionals. Rev Rene 2021; 22:e70762.

22 Julio RS, Lourenção LG, Oliveira SM, Farias DHR, Gazetta CE. Prevalence of anxiety and depression in Brazilian Primary Health Care workers. Cad Bras Ter Ocup 2022; 30:e2997.
-2323 Lourenção LG. Work engagement among participants of residency and professional development programs in nursing. Rev Bras Enferm 2018; 71(Supl. 4):1487-1492. despite the growing numbers of male staff in the profession2424 Manning J. The Influence of Nurse Manager Leadership Style on Staff Nurse Work Engagement. J Nurs Manag 2016; 46(9):438-443..

Evaluation of levels of work engagement among nursing staffs showed that they felt considerable concentration and pleasure connecting them to their work, as well as very high levels of energy and mental resilience, and involvement with and enthusiasm for their work. These results are consistent with those reported in other studies on work engagement among nursing personnel in Brazil1414 Nazario M, Klimeck KA. Qualidade de vida e engajamento no trabalho: Uma análise em uma cooperativa de assistência à saúde. Rev Gestao Org Coop 2016; 3(5):43-56.,2525 Zavala MOQ, Klinj TP, Carrillo KLS. Quality of life in the workplace for nursing staff at public healthcare institutions. Rev Lat-Am Enferm 2016; 24:e2713. and other countries2424 Manning J. The Influence of Nurse Manager Leadership Style on Staff Nurse Work Engagement. J Nurs Manag 2016; 46(9):438-443.,2626 Maio TM. Bullying e Engagement em Enfermeiros [dissertação]. Porto: Porto School of Nursing; 2016.,2727 Merino CF, Gallardo RY. Describiendo el engagement en profesionales de enfermería de atención primaria de salud. Cien Enferm 2014; 20(3):131-140. and show that the study participants were strongly committed to and aligned with their work environment and job activities at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Maintaining engagement in work entails deploying both personal and professional capabilities, as well as professional autonomy in the workplace2828 Silva M, Borges E, Baptista P, Queirós C. Engagement e satisfação dos enfermeiros do pré-hospitalar. Rev Port Enferm Saude Mental 2020; (n. esp. 7):25-30.. In this study, nursing coordinators at the hospital scored highest, corroborating the literature, which reports higher levels of work engagement among nursing managers2929 Silva AG, Cabrera EMS, Gazetta CE, Sodré PC, Castro JR, Cordioli Jr JR, Cordioli DFC, Lourenção LG. Engagement in primary health care nurses: A cross-sectional study in a Brazilian city. Public Health Nurs 2019; 37(2):169-177..

Most of the staff assessed were found to enjoy satisfactory levels of WRQoL, mainly in relation to the workers’ perceptions of the hospital’s social responsibility, the quality of services provided and care for the workers. These findings show that the enterprise’s investment in conditions favourable to employee well-being, which favour development and organisational justice, contribute to heightening workers’ quality of life and work engagement3030 Vidal-Blanco G, Oliver A, Galiana L, Sansó N. Quality of work life and self-care in nursing staff with high emotional demand. Enferm Clin 2019; 29(3):186-94..

On the other hand, the participants returned intermediate levels of WRQoL in terms of appropriate pay for the job and equity criteria. This is a delicate situation for the whole nursing profession in Brazil, which suffers from wage inequalities and is poorly paid, leading personnel to hold more than one job. In combination with long working hours, WRQoL impaired by perceptions relating to fair and adequate compensation can potentiate a process of physical and emotional burnout and undermine staff performance3131 Chung Y, Kim H, Koh DH, Park JP, Yoon S. Relationship Between Shift Intensity and Insomnia Among Hospital Nurses in Korea: A Cross-sectional Study. J Prev Med Public Health 2021; 54(1):46-54.,3232 Baldoino ES, Santos MC. Qualidade de vida dos profissionais de enfermagem com dupla jornada de trabalho: uma revisão da literatura [dissertação]. Goiânia: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás; 2020.. Note also that remuneration is not considered to be a satisfaction factor that heightens WRQoL, but rather - when perceived to be fair and adequate - is a condition that helps to avert dissatisfaction3333 Sabonete SA, Lopes HSC, Rosado DP, Reis JCG. Quality of Work Life According to Walton's Model: Case Study of the Higher Institute of Defense Studies of Mozambique. Soc Sci 2021; 10(7):244. helping to avoid undermining WRQoL.

A study with nursing personnel at public health institutions in a Mexican city indicated that their greatest dissatisfaction related to wages and contractual rights. It emphasised that nursing staff should be adequately remunerated for their work in order to ensure them good WRQoL2525 Zavala MOQ, Klinj TP, Carrillo KLS. Quality of life in the workplace for nursing staff at public healthcare institutions. Rev Lat-Am Enferm 2016; 24:e2713..

When this study was conducted, the COVID-19 pandemic was already causing increased emotional suffering among nursing personnel, because of the risk of contamination and uncertainties as to the treatment and cure for the disease3434 Contreras CCT. COVID-19 Pandemics: an opportunity to give Nursing global visibility. Rev Gaucha Enferm 2020; 41:e20200139.. The authors believe that the pandemic’s strong emotional impact intensified the loss of WRQoL among nursing professionals. Moreover, that strong emotional pressure can interfere with nursing staffs’ coping strategies, and they begin to display prevention and denial behaviour in an attempt to avoid the problem. This behaviour impairs workers’ performance3535 Lourenção LG, Rigino BM, Sasaki NSGMS, Pinto MJC, Ximenes Neto FRG, Borges FA, Santos MLSG, Penha JGM, Galvão DM, Santos BMP, Cunha ICKO, Oliveira JF, Afonso MDS, Cunha CLF, Silva FG, Freire NP, Nascimento VF, Rodrigues ST, Carvalho TM, Lemos M, Cunha JL, Domingos NAM. Analysis of the Coping Strategies of Primary Health Care Professionals: Cross-Sectional Study in a Large Brazilian Munici-pality. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19(6):3332..

Although work engagement is considered a stable phenomenon, it is related to organisational and job characteristics88 Magnan ES, Vazquez ACS, Pacico JC, Hutz CS. Normatização da versão Brasileira da Escala Utrecht de Engajamento no Trabalho. Aval Psicol 2016; 15(2):133-140.,1212 Wang X, Liu L, Zou F, Hao J, Wu H. Associations of Occupational Stressors, Perceived Organizational Support, and Psychological Capital with Work Engagement among Chinese Female Nurses. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017:5284628.,3636 Oliveira LB, Rocha JDC. Engajamento no trabalho: antecedentes individuais e situacionais e sua relação com a intenção de rotatividade. Rev Bras Gestao Negocios 2017; 19(65):415-431.. Accordingly, the authors believe that levels of work engagement among the study participants may have changed since the time of this study, because the health scenario resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the health service work process adversely3737 Frawley T, Van Gelderen F, Somanadhan S, Coveney K, Phelan A, Lynam-Loane P, De Brún A. The impact of COVID-19 on health systems, mental health and the potential for nursing. Ir J Psychol Med 2021; 38(3):220-226.,3838 Spoorthy MS, Pratapa SK, Mahant S. Mental health problems faced by healthcare workers due to the COVID-19 pandemic - a review. Asian J Psychiatr 2020; 51:102119..

Participants in this study with satisfactory quality of life tended to display higher levels of work engagement. This suggests that it is important for the organisation to invest in programmes and measures to increase workers’ satisfaction, and improve their interpersonal relations, well-being and physical and mental health3939 Efendi F, Kurniati A, Bushy A, Gunawan J. Concept analysis of nurse retention. Nurs Health Sci 2019; 21(4):422-427..

There are times, however, as in the case of the COVID-19 pandemic, when work is intensely demanding and can result in physical and emotional weaknesses. At such times, workers’ engagement may increase, even though they perceive some aspects to be unsatisfactory and to prejudice work-related quality of life4040 Giménez-Espert MDC, Prado-Gascó V, Soto-Rubio A. Psychosocial Risks, Work Engagement, and Job Satisfaction of Nurses During COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Public Health 2020; 8:566896.. This may explain the presence of staff with unsatisfactory levels of social integration, constitutionalism and social relevance, who show higher levels of absorption (concentration and attention) and work engagement (enthusiasm, attention and euphoria).

The authors also believe that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic can explain the high levels of absorption shown by workers with unsatisfactory levels of work and life space. During that period, the uncertainties due to lack of information about the risks of transmission and death adversely influenced other spheres of health workers’ lives, such as family relationships. The pandemic immersed nursing personnel in their work and made it difficult for them to detach themselves from the work environment4040 Giménez-Espert MDC, Prado-Gascó V, Soto-Rubio A. Psychosocial Risks, Work Engagement, and Job Satisfaction of Nurses During COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Public Health 2020; 8:566896..

In the case of nursing personnel, job satisfaction is significantly related to their psychological empowerment. This empowerment manifests itself through four cognitive experiences: meaning, competence, self-determination and impact. Competence is similar to the WRQoL Immediate Opportunity to Use and Develop Human Capabilities domain4141 Li H, Shi Y, Li Y, Xing Z, Wang S, Ying J, Zhang M, Sun J. Relationship between nurse psychological empowerment and job satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs 2018; 74(6):1264-1277.. This relationship was evidenced in our study, which showed lower levels of work engagement among professionals whose use of skills was at an unsatisfactory level, while professionals who reported a satisfactory level in their use of skills were more engaged in the work. This demonstrates that workers who feel secure in their activities and have opportunities to acquire knowledge in the organisation can pursue a path of empowerment, be more satisfied at work and enjoy better perceived WRQoL.

The main limitation of this study was its cross-sectional design, which does not allow cause-and-effect relationships to be identified. The study also appears to be the first in the scientific literature to present a diagnosis of levels of work engagement and WRQoL among nursing staffs in the study period. Nonetheless, based on the evaluation of work engagement and WRQoL, the findings can inform discussions about the impact of overwork and physical and emotional burnout on the mental health of nursing workers in the pandemic context.

Conclusion

The study showed that nursing staffs were strongly engaged in their work and satisfied with their work-related quality of life at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Work engagement showed a positive correlation with WRQoL, underlining the importance of health institutions’ developing strategies to acknowledge and enhance the value of nursing personnel, based on considerations that influence satisfaction and involvement at work.

It is also clear that the increasingly precarious state of resources available to most Brazilian health institutions - and evidenced by the COVID-19 pandemic - reinforces the need to develop strategies, such as recognition for and appreciation of their work, that increase WRQoL and work engagement among nursing personnel.

It is suggested that new studies be undertaken, using multivariate analysis and other approaches and including broader groups of personnel at different health institutions, in order to assess the impacts of the pandemic on levels of engagement and work-related quality of life among frontline nursing staff.

References

  • 1
    Azevedo JNL, Silva RF, Macêdo TTS. Principais causas de absenteísmo na equipe de enfermagem: revisão bibliográfica. Rev Enferm Contemp 2019; 8(1):80-86.
  • 2
    Kunrath GM, Santarem MD, Oliveira JLC, Machado MLP, Camargo MP, Rosa NG, Almeida VM, Vieira LB. Predictors associated with absenteeism-disease among Nursing professionals working in an emergency hospital service. Rev Gaucha Enferm 2021; 42:e20190433.
  • 3
    Dal'Bosco EB, Floriano LSM, Skupien SV, Arcaro G, Martins AR, Anselmo ACC. Mental health of nursing in coping with COVID-19 at a regional university hospital. Rev Bras Enferm 2020; 73(Supl. 2):e20200434.
  • 4
    Teixeira CFS, Soares CM, Souza EA, Lisboa ES, Pinto ICM, Andrade LR, Espiridião MA. The health of healthcare professionals coping with the Covid-19 pandemic. Cien Saude Colet 2020; 25(9):3465-3474.
  • 5
    Van Kraaij J, Van Oostveen C, Vermeulen H, Heinen M, Huis A, Adriaansen M, Peters J. Nurse practitioners' perceptions of their ability to enact leadership in hospital care. J Clin Nurs 2020; 29(3-4):447-458.
  • 6
    Rotta DS, Lourenção LG, Gonsalez EG, Teixeira PR, Gazetta CE, Pinto MH. Engagement of multi-professional residents in health. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2019; 53:e03437.
  • 7
    Remegio W, Rivera RR, Griffin MQ, Fitzpatrick JJ. The Professional Quality of Life and Work Engagement of Nurse Leaders. Nurse Lead 2021;19(1):95-100.
  • 8
    Magnan ES, Vazquez ACS, Pacico JC, Hutz CS. Normatização da versão Brasileira da Escala Utrecht de Engajamento no Trabalho. Aval Psicol 2016; 15(2):133-140.
  • 9
    Oliveira RS. O papel do gestor na maximização da produtividade no meio ambiente do trabalho [tcc]. Marília: Centro Universitário Eurípides de Marília; 2016.
  • 10
    Wong IA, Wan YKP, Gao JH. How to attract and retain Generation Y employees? An exploration of career choice and the meaning of work. Tour Manag Perspect 2017; 23:140-150.
  • 11
    Gonsalez EG, Lourenção LG, Teixeira PR, Rotta DS, Gazetta CE, Beretta D, Pinto MH. Work engagement in employees at professional improvement programs in health. Cad Bras Ter Ocup 2017; 25(3):509-517.
  • 12
    Wang X, Liu L, Zou F, Hao J, Wu H. Associations of Occupational Stressors, Perceived Organizational Support, and Psychological Capital with Work Engagement among Chinese Female Nurses. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017:5284628.
  • 13
    Moloney W, Fieldes J, Jacobs S. An Integrative Review of How Healthcare Organizations Can Support Hospital Nurses to Thrive at Work. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(23):8757.
  • 14
    Nazario M, Klimeck KA. Qualidade de vida e engajamento no trabalho: Uma análise em uma cooperativa de assistência à saúde. Rev Gestao Org Coop 2016; 3(5):43-56.
  • 15
    Vazquez ACS, Magnan EDS, Pacico JC, Hutz CS, Schaufeli WB. Adaptation and Validation of the Brazilian Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Psico USF 2015; 20(2):207-217.
  • 16
    Timossi L, Pedroso B, Pilatti L, Francisco A. Walton's model adaptation for quality of work life evaluation. J Phys Educ 2009; 20(3):395-405.
  • 17
    Wright A. REDCap: A Tool for the Electronic Capture of Research Data. J Electron Resour Med Libr 2016; 14(4):197-201.
  • 18
    Schaufeli W, Bakker A. Escala de Engagement no Trabalho de Utrecht - Manual. Trad. R Agnst, AMT Benevides-Pereira, PC Porto-Martins. Curitiba: GEPEB; 2009.
  • 19
    Conselho Federal de Enfermagem (Cofen). Enfermagem em números [Internet]. 2022 [acessado 2022 jan 20]. Disponível em: http://www.cofen.gov.br/enfermagem-em-numeros
    » http://www.cofen.gov.br/enfermagem-em-numeros
  • 20
    Lourenção LG, Silva RAS, Moretti MSR, Sasaki NSGMS, Sodré PC, Gazetta CE. Career commitment and entrenchment among Primary Care nurses. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2021; 55:e20210186.
  • 21
    Julio RS, Lourenção LG, Penha JGM, Oliveira AMN, Nascimento VF, Oliveira SM, Gazetta CE. Anxiety, depression, and work engagement in Primary Health Care nursing professionals. Rev Rene 2021; 22:e70762.
  • 22
    Julio RS, Lourenção LG, Oliveira SM, Farias DHR, Gazetta CE. Prevalence of anxiety and depression in Brazilian Primary Health Care workers. Cad Bras Ter Ocup 2022; 30:e2997.
  • 23
    Lourenção LG. Work engagement among participants of residency and professional development programs in nursing. Rev Bras Enferm 2018; 71(Supl. 4):1487-1492.
  • 24
    Manning J. The Influence of Nurse Manager Leadership Style on Staff Nurse Work Engagement. J Nurs Manag 2016; 46(9):438-443.
  • 25
    Zavala MOQ, Klinj TP, Carrillo KLS. Quality of life in the workplace for nursing staff at public healthcare institutions. Rev Lat-Am Enferm 2016; 24:e2713.
  • 26
    Maio TM. Bullying e Engagement em Enfermeiros [dissertação]. Porto: Porto School of Nursing; 2016.
  • 27
    Merino CF, Gallardo RY. Describiendo el engagement en profesionales de enfermería de atención primaria de salud. Cien Enferm 2014; 20(3):131-140.
  • 28
    Silva M, Borges E, Baptista P, Queirós C. Engagement e satisfação dos enfermeiros do pré-hospitalar. Rev Port Enferm Saude Mental 2020; (n. esp. 7):25-30.
  • 29
    Silva AG, Cabrera EMS, Gazetta CE, Sodré PC, Castro JR, Cordioli Jr JR, Cordioli DFC, Lourenção LG. Engagement in primary health care nurses: A cross-sectional study in a Brazilian city. Public Health Nurs 2019; 37(2):169-177.
  • 30
    Vidal-Blanco G, Oliver A, Galiana L, Sansó N. Quality of work life and self-care in nursing staff with high emotional demand. Enferm Clin 2019; 29(3):186-94.
  • 31
    Chung Y, Kim H, Koh DH, Park JP, Yoon S. Relationship Between Shift Intensity and Insomnia Among Hospital Nurses in Korea: A Cross-sectional Study. J Prev Med Public Health 2021; 54(1):46-54.
  • 32
    Baldoino ES, Santos MC. Qualidade de vida dos profissionais de enfermagem com dupla jornada de trabalho: uma revisão da literatura [dissertação]. Goiânia: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás; 2020.
  • 33
    Sabonete SA, Lopes HSC, Rosado DP, Reis JCG. Quality of Work Life According to Walton's Model: Case Study of the Higher Institute of Defense Studies of Mozambique. Soc Sci 2021; 10(7):244.
  • 34
    Contreras CCT. COVID-19 Pandemics: an opportunity to give Nursing global visibility. Rev Gaucha Enferm 2020; 41:e20200139.
  • 35
    Lourenção LG, Rigino BM, Sasaki NSGMS, Pinto MJC, Ximenes Neto FRG, Borges FA, Santos MLSG, Penha JGM, Galvão DM, Santos BMP, Cunha ICKO, Oliveira JF, Afonso MDS, Cunha CLF, Silva FG, Freire NP, Nascimento VF, Rodrigues ST, Carvalho TM, Lemos M, Cunha JL, Domingos NAM. Analysis of the Coping Strategies of Primary Health Care Professionals: Cross-Sectional Study in a Large Brazilian Munici-pality. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19(6):3332.
  • 36
    Oliveira LB, Rocha JDC. Engajamento no trabalho: antecedentes individuais e situacionais e sua relação com a intenção de rotatividade. Rev Bras Gestao Negocios 2017; 19(65):415-431.
  • 37
    Frawley T, Van Gelderen F, Somanadhan S, Coveney K, Phelan A, Lynam-Loane P, De Brún A. The impact of COVID-19 on health systems, mental health and the potential for nursing. Ir J Psychol Med 2021; 38(3):220-226.
  • 38
    Spoorthy MS, Pratapa SK, Mahant S. Mental health problems faced by healthcare workers due to the COVID-19 pandemic - a review. Asian J Psychiatr 2020; 51:102119.
  • 39
    Efendi F, Kurniati A, Bushy A, Gunawan J. Concept analysis of nurse retention. Nurs Health Sci 2019; 21(4):422-427.
  • 40
    Giménez-Espert MDC, Prado-Gascó V, Soto-Rubio A. Psychosocial Risks, Work Engagement, and Job Satisfaction of Nurses During COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Public Health 2020; 8:566896.
  • 41
    Li H, Shi Y, Li Y, Xing Z, Wang S, Ying J, Zhang M, Sun J. Relationship between nurse psychological empowerment and job satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs 2018; 74(6):1264-1277.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    23 Oct 2023
  • Date of issue
    Oct 2023

History

  • Received
    03 July 2022
  • Accepted
    01 June 2023
  • Published
    26 June 2023
ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: revscol@fiocruz.br