Diagnostic performance of Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania peruviana antigens in the immunoblot method for the detection of american tegumentary leishmaniasis

Nyshon Rojas-Palomino Aidé Sandoval-Juarez Gilmer Solis-Sánchez Gloria Minaya-Gómez About the authors

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to determine the performance of Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania peruviana antigens in the detection of ATL by using serum samples obtained between 2013 - 2016. The obtained soluble and excretion/secretion antigens were transferred to membrane nitrocellulose by immunoblot assay. The evaluation was carried out against sera confirmed for ATL, at a confidence level of 95%, determining that the soluble antigen of Leishmania braziliensis had a sensitivity of 87.7%, specificity of 100% and area under the curve of 0.95; on the other hand, Leishmania peruviana showed values of 92.3%, 95.7% and 0.94, respectively. According to the results, we recommend that the reported immunogenic regions should be characterized and analyzed in order to continue with the development of recombinant and synthetic proteins, aimed at improving the efficiency of the serological diagnosis of the disease.

Keywords:
Leishmaniasis; Leishmania; Western Blotting; Leishmania braziliensis; Antigens; Sensitivity and Specificity

KEY MESSAGES

Motivation for the study. To contribute to the immunogenic character of soluble and excretion/secretion antigens of Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania peruviana with the aim of identifying proteins with diagnostic potential.

Main findings. The soluble antigen of Leishmania braziliensis has a sensitivity in the detection of ATL of 87.7%, specificity of 100% and a false positive rate of 20% against sera from patients with Chagas disease and 8.3% with mycosis.

Implications. Immunoblot can improve the resolution capacity in the serological diagnosis of American tegumentary Leishmaniasis, particularly in patients where the length of the disease and the clinical form make difficult the diagnosis by parasitological methods.

Keywords:
Leishmaniasis; Leishmania; Western Blotting; Leishmania braziliensis; Antigens; Sensitivity and Specificity

INTRODUCTION

American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL), a disease caused by more than 20 species of Leishmania, groups a set of clinical manifestations ranging from single to multiple lesions, nodular, plaque-like, among others, to lesions that may involve mucous membranes. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), our continent reports more than 1 million cases, with Brazil, Colombia and Peru together accounting for 72% of all cases of ATL 11. Sheikh SS, Amir AA, Amir BA, Amir AA. Leishmaniasis. Parasitology and Microbiology Research. 2020; doi: 10.5772/intechopen.90680.
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90680...
,22. Organización Mundial de la Salud. OP de la S. Leishmaniasis. Informe epidemiológico de las Américas Num. 11, diciembre 2022. 2022:1-12..

In Peru, ATL is caused by 8 species, being Leishmania braziliensis of major importance due to the damage it can inflict on the patient, from the localized and disseminated cutaneous form to the mucosal form. Other reported species are Leishmania peruviana, Leishmania guyanensis, Leishmania panamensis, Leishmania shawi, Leishmania lainsoni, Leishmania naiffi and Leishmania amazonensis33. Sandoval-Juárez A, Minaya-Gómez G, Rojas-Palomino N, Cáceres O. Identificación de especies de Leishmania en pacientes derivados al Instituto Nacional de Salud del Perú. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2020.37(1):87-92. doi: 10.17843/rpmesp.2020.371.4514.
https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2020.371...
. This disease is reported in 19 regions of the country, where more than 156,000 cases have been recorded, of which approximately 10,000 (6.4%) correspond to the mucosal form 33. Sandoval-Juárez A, Minaya-Gómez G, Rojas-Palomino N, Cáceres O. Identificación de especies de Leishmania en pacientes derivados al Instituto Nacional de Salud del Perú. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2020.37(1):87-92. doi: 10.17843/rpmesp.2020.371.4514.
https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2020.371...
,44. Centro Nacional de Epidemiologia Prevencion y Control de Enfermedades. Ministerio de Salud. Sala de situación de salud. Ministerio de Salud. SE 17-2024..

This disease is mainly diagnosed by parasitological methods such as Direct Microscopic Examination (DME) with Giemsa staining and in vitro culture, both confirm the disease by microscopic visualization of the parasite, these methods have high specificity, but limited sensitivity mainly due to the clinical form and the time of evolution of the disease, it is not recommended in patients with chronic skin lesions or mucosal involvement, due to the low number of amastigotes in the lesion, which hinders its detection 55. de Jesus Oliveira Gonçalves CA, Carneiro JT, de Souza Cruz EL, de Sousa Neves Filho F, Rivadeneira Cárdenas RC, Guimarães DM. Parasitological association between human leishmaniosis mucosa and paracoccidioidomycosis. Case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020.76:170-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.09.128.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.09....
,66. Gow I, Smith NC, Stark D, Ellis J. Laboratory diagnostics for human Leishmania infections: a polymerase chain reaction-focussed review of detection and identification methods. Parasites and Vectors. 2022.15(1):1-25. doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05524-z.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05524...
. Other factors are over-aggregated bacterial infection, lack of experience in obtaining the sample and recognition of the amastigote forms 55. de Jesus Oliveira Gonçalves CA, Carneiro JT, de Souza Cruz EL, de Sousa Neves Filho F, Rivadeneira Cárdenas RC, Guimarães DM. Parasitological association between human leishmaniosis mucosa and paracoccidioidomycosis. Case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020.76:170-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.09.128.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.09....
,77. Martins ALGP, Barreto JA, Lauris JRP, Martins ACGP. American tegumentary leishmaniasis: Correlations among immunological, histopathological and clinical parameters. An Bras Dermatol. 2014.89(1):52-8. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20142226.
https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.201...
.

Serological methods such as Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF) and ELISA, allow diagnosis by detection of anti-Leishmania antibodies, mainly in patients with chronic skin lesions with clinical suspicion and in those with mucosal involvement 88. Reimão JQ, Coser EM, Lee MR, Coelho AC. Laboratory Diagnosis of Cutaneous and Visceral Leishmaniasis: Current and Future Methods. Microorganisms. 2020.8(11):1632. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8111632.
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms81...
. In Peru, IIF with complete parasite as antigen is widely used in diagnosis, despite the limitations associated with cross-reactivity mainly against Chagas disease due to the considerable genomic and proteomic similarity between Leishmania spp and Trypanosoma cruzi99. Bartholomeu DC, Teixeira SMR, Cruz AK. Genomics and functional genomics in Leishmania and Trypanosoma cruzi: statuses, challenges and perspectives. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2021.116(1):1-21. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760200634.
https://doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760200634...
,1010. Bartholomeu DC, de Paiva RMC, Mendes TAO, DaRocha WD, Teixeira SMR. Unveiling the Intracellular Survival Gene Kit of Trypanosomatid Parasites. PLoS Pathog. 2014.10(12):e1004399. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004399.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.100...
.

Likewise, the efficiency of serological methods is linked to the nature of the antigen, structure and location of the used protein, origin of the antigen, species or stage from which it was obtained, among others; the protein miscellany resulting from the parasite’s gene expression affects the diagnostic performance of the method 1111. Lévêque MF, Lachaud L, Simon L, Battery E, Marty P, Pomares C. Place of Serology in the Diagnosis of Zoonotic Leishmaniases With a Focus on Visceral Leishmaniasis Due to Leishmania infantum. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020.10(67):1-10. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00067.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00067...
,1212. Freire ML, Rêgo FD, Cota G, Pascoal-Xavier MA, Oliveira E. Potential antigenic targets used in immunological tests for diagnosis of tegumentary leishmaniasis: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2021.16(5):e0251956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251956.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.025...
.

Therefore, studies related to the identification and evaluation of serological biomarkers are currently being developed to improve the efficiency of the method 1313. Coelho EAF, Costa LE, Lage DP, Martins VT, Garde E, de Jesus Pereira NC, et al. Evaluation of two recombinant Leishmania proteins identified by an immunoproteomic approach as tools for the serodiagnosis of canine visceral and human tegumentary leishmaniasis. Vet Parasitol. 2016.215:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.11.006.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.11...
,1414. Sato CM, Sanchez MCA, Celeste BJ, Duthie MS, Guderian J, Reed SG, et al. Use of Recombinant Antigens for Sensitive Serodiagnosis of American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis Caused by Different Leishmania Species. J Clin Microbiol. 2017.55(2):495-503. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01904-16.
https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01904-16...
, reducing inter- and intra-species variability and even the immune response by the infecting species 1515. Romero GAS, Orge MDLGO, Guerra MVDF, Paes MG, Macêdo VDO, Carvalho EM de. Antibody response in patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis infected by Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis or Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis in Brazil. Acta Trop. 2005.93(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2004.09.005.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.20...
.

In this regard, this study aimed to evaluate and determine the diagnostic performance of soluble and excretion/secretion antigens of Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania peruviana on Immunoblot against sera from confirmed patients for the detection of American tegumentary Leishmaniasis.

THE STUDY

Study design

An observational study of diagnostic tests was conducted at the National Referral Laboratory for Metaxenics and Parasitic Zoonoses (LRN MEZOP) of the National Institute of Health between 2013 - 2016, approved by the Research and Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Health with RD N°170-2013-DG-OGITT-OPE/INS.

Population and sample

The study population consisted of sera stored in the LRN MEZOP-INS serum collection obtained in the framework of specialized diagnostic activities of ATL between 2013-2016.

The sample size was determined using the Epidat v3.0 program considering an expected specificity of 98%, 5% precision, healthy/sick ratio of 0.25; at a confidence level of 95%.

A total of 187 serum samples were randomly selected considering the DME method as eligibility criteria for the cutaneous form and the epidemiological clinical history in addition to the IIF result for the mucosal form.

The sample consisted of 100 sera of the cutaneous form and 30 of the mucosal form, confirmed by microscopic visualization of the amastigotes forms in DME or by indirect immunofluorescence plus the epidemiological clinical history, respectively; as well as 30 sera from healthy patients without clinical suspicion of the disease from non-endemic areas; and 27 samples of other pathologies involved in the differential diagnosis of the disease, mycosis 1212. Freire ML, Rêgo FD, Cota G, Pascoal-Xavier MA, Oliveira E. Potential antigenic targets used in immunological tests for diagnosis of tegumentary leishmaniasis: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2021.16(5):e0251956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251956.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.025...
and Chagas disease 1515. Romero GAS, Orge MDLGO, Guerra MVDF, Paes MG, Macêdo VDO, Carvalho EM de. Antibody response in patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis infected by Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis or Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis in Brazil. Acta Trop. 2005.93(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2004.09.005.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.20...
.

On the other hand, serum samples from pregnant patients, immunosuppressed patients or hemolyzed samples or those with signs of contamination were excluded.

Statistical analysis

We determined frequency measures and percentages, as well as contingency tables with the obtained results. The diagnostic performance of Leishmania (V.) braziliensis and Leishmania (V.) peruviana antigens was assessed against the DME reference method for the cutaneous type and the IIF method for the mucosal form, using the X2 distribution with Bonferroni adjustment.

Estimators and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for diagnostic performance measures such as sensitivity, specificity 1616. Instituto Nacional de Calidad. Directive for the validation and verification of qualitative analysis procedures in the Clinical Laboratories. Peru; 2020., area under the ROC curve, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio for each of the antigens. The statistical program Stata v17.1 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA) was used for the analysis using a significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS

In tour study, 87.2% of the samples corresponded to patients with DME-confirmed ATL and 12.8% were from patients without suspected disease (Supplementary Material Table S1).

SDS-PAGE electrophoresis showed that soluble and ES antigens presented a protein profile from approximately 15 kDa to 250 kDa for both Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania peruviana (Supplementary Material Figure S1).

The evaluation against the control sera showed that the soluble antigens of Leishmania (V. ) braziliensis had a sensitivity of 87.7% (95%CI: 80.8-92.8) and specificity of 100% (95%CI: 85.2-100), on the other hand, among the groups, it had a sensitivity of 96% (IC95%: 90.1-98.9) for the cutaneous form and 60% (IC95%: 40.6-77.3) for the mucosal type; it also presented cross-reactivity, 20% against sera from patients with Chagas disease and 8.3% against patients with mycosis.

The soluble Leishmania (V.) peruviana antigen had a sensitivity of 92.3% (95%CI: 86.3-96.2) and specificity of 95.7%; between groups it had a sensitivity of 91% for the cutaneous form, 97.7% for the mucosal type, as detailed in Table 1, and a cross-reactivity of 33.3% and 50% for Chagas disease and mycosis, respectively (Table 2).

Table 1
Diagnostic performance of soluble and excretion/secretion Ag. of Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania peruviana.
Table 2
Cross-reactivity of soluble antigens and ES antigens of Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania peruviana.

Likewise, the evaluation of concordance in the detection of ATL showed, considering the fractions between 50-55 kDa as positivity criteria (Figure 1), that the soluble antigen of Leishmania (V.) braziliensis had a kappa index of 0.68 and 0.76 for Leishmania (V.) peruviana; on the other hand, among the cutaneous and mucosal groups, the soluble antigen of Leishmania (V.) braziliensis had a kappa index of 0.9 and 0.76, respectively, and in case of Leishmania (V.) peruviana, 0.56 for the cutaneous and 0.92 for the mucosal form of the disease (Supplementary Material Table S2).

Figure 1
Comparison of the area under the curve of soluble and excretion/secretion antigens of Leishmania (V.) braziliensis and Leishmania (V.) peruviana. Where LbT: soluble antigen of Leishmania braziliensis; LpT: soluble antigen of Leishmania peruviana; LbE/S: excretion/secretion antigen of Leishmania braziliensis: LpE/S: excretion/secretion antigen of Leishmania peruviana: AUC: area under the curve.

Regarding the diagnostic performance of ATL, the LbSA antigen had an area under the curve of 0.95; it was 0.98 for the cutaneous form and 0.80 for the mucosal; while, the LpSA reached an area under the curve of 0.94 in the detection of ATL; 0.93 for the cutaneous form and 0.96 for the mucosal, as detailed in Table 1 and Supplementary Material Figure S3.

DISCUSSION

In this study, the immunoblot method has allowed, among other things, to demonstrate the vast diversity of proteins presented by Leishmania spp 1717. De Abreu Filho BA, Maia KR, Costacurta R, Gonçalves CCM, Jankevicius JV, Padovesi EJ, et al. Evaluation of antigens from various Leishmania species in a Western blot for diagnosis of American tegumentary leishmaniasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002.66(1):91-102. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2002.66.91.
https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2002.66.91...
,1818. Dinç M, Yalçin T, Çavus I, Özbilgin A. Comparative proteomic analysis of Leishmania parasites isolated from visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis patients. Parasitology. 2022.149(3):298-305. doi: 10.1017/S0031182021001967.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S003118202100196...
, the antigen-antibody interaction by means of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent reaction, and the identification of potential biomarkers that could improve the serological diagnosis of the disease 1919. Pena HP, Belo VS, Xavier-Junior JCC, Teixeira-Neto RG, Melo SN, Pereira DA, et al. Accuracy of diagnostic tests for American tegumentary leishmaniasis: a systematic literature review with meta-analyses. Trop Med Int Heal. 2020.25(10):1168-81. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13465.
https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13465...
.

Related studies, using antigen obtained from Leishmania major MRHO/IR/75/ER, determined that the protein with the best performance in the detection of anti-Leishmania antibodies was 63 kDa, this fraction had a sensitivity of 96.7% and a specificity of 70% 2020. Ashrafmansouri M, Sarkari B, Hatam G, Habibi P, Abdolahi Khabisi S. Utility of Western Blot Analysis for the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. Iran J Parasitol. 2015.10(4):599-604., whereas, Brito et al, (2000) using Leishmania braziliensis MHOM/BR/75/M2903 proteins against sera from confirmed patients, reported as immunogenic proteins those of molecular weight 30 and 27 kDa, which were recognized in 88% and 91% of the cases, the 48 kDa protein fraction in 70%, and those of 60 kDa and 66 kDa in less than 35% of the samples. Considering the visualization of these protein fractions as a criterion for positivity in the detection of anti-Leishmania antibodies, they reported a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 100% 2121. Brito MEF, Mendonc¸a MG, Gomes YM, Jardim ML, Abath FGC. Identification of Potentially Diagnostic Leishmania braziliensis Antigens in Human Cutaneous Leishmaniasis by Immunoblot Analysis. Clin Diagnostic Lab Immunol. 2000.7(2):318-21. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.7.2.318-321.2000.
https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.7.2.318-321...
; and 76.9% and 100%, respectively, using Leishmania (V.) braziliensis MHOM/BR/1987/M11272 antigens, considering proteins of molecular weight 42, 58 and 63 kDa as criteria for positivity 1717. De Abreu Filho BA, Maia KR, Costacurta R, Gonçalves CCM, Jankevicius JV, Padovesi EJ, et al. Evaluation of antigens from various Leishmania species in a Western blot for diagnosis of American tegumentary leishmaniasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002.66(1):91-102. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2002.66.91.
https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2002.66.91...
.

In our study, the immunogenic proteins with the best performance in the detection of ATL were between 50-55 kDa, which reached a sensitivity of 87.7% and specificity of 100% using Leishmania (V.) braziliensis, and 92.3% and 95.7%, respectively, in Leishmania (V.) peruviana. In contrast, the 63, 42, 30 and 27 kDa proteins previously reported showed a frequency of less than 15% against cutaneous and mucosal sera in the samples included in the study.

These differences in the immunogenic character of Leishmania are probably related to the intrinsic characteristics of each species and even within the same species, although previous studies used the strains of Leishmania braziliensis MHOM/BR/75/M2903 and MHOM/BR/1987/M11272, both correspond to isolates from Brazil, on the contrary, this study was developed using the strain MHOM/PE/84/LC53 isolated in Peru. It should be pointed out that studies on Leishmania braziliensis have demonstrated genetic divergence even in those isolated within the same geographical area 2222. S L Figueiredo de Sá B, Rezende AM, Melo Neto OP de, Brito MEF de, Brandão Filho SP. Identification of divergent Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis ecotypes derived from a geographically restricted area through whole genome analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019.13(6):e0007382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007382.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.000...
, each of them with clearly differentiable characteristics thanks to current methodologies. For this reason, the immunogenic character found in this study could be related to the genetic component of the species.

ES antigens showed high specificity, but limited sensitivity, a result that resembles that reported by Longoni et al. (2014), who, from strains of Leishmania amazonensis and Leishmania peruviana and employing soluble antigens, reported a sensitivity of 21.6% and 56.9% respectively, and when using iron superoxide dismutase secreted antigens in both species the sensitivity was 82.4% and 11.8%, respectively 2323. Longoni SS, Marín C, Sánchez-Moreno M. Excreted Leishmania peruviana and Leishmania amazonensis iron-superoxide dismutase purification: Specific antibody detection in Colombian patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2014.69:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.01.012.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed....
.

Currently, indirect immunofluorescence is a widely used method for the serological diagnosis of the disease, it has variable sensitivity and specificity which depends on factors such as the time of evolution of the disease and the clinical form of the disease, in addition to the species of Leishmania used as antigen, in that sense, using promastigotes of Leishmania infantum and sera of immunosuppressed patients with visceral leishmaniasis, the IIF method presented a sensitivity of 79.4% and specificity of 99.2% 88. Reimão JQ, Coser EM, Lee MR, Coelho AC. Laboratory Diagnosis of Cutaneous and Visceral Leishmaniasis: Current and Future Methods. Microorganisms. 2020.8(11):1632. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8111632.
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms81...
. On the other hand, for the tegumentary form, the sensitivity of the method in the detection of ATL was 90% and specificity between 62% and 100% 88. Reimão JQ, Coser EM, Lee MR, Coelho AC. Laboratory Diagnosis of Cutaneous and Visceral Leishmaniasis: Current and Future Methods. Microorganisms. 2020.8(11):1632. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8111632.
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms81...
,1919. Pena HP, Belo VS, Xavier-Junior JCC, Teixeira-Neto RG, Melo SN, Pereira DA, et al. Accuracy of diagnostic tests for American tegumentary leishmaniasis: a systematic literature review with meta-analyses. Trop Med Int Heal. 2020.25(10):1168-81. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13465.
https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13465...
.

The cross-reactivity assessed against sera from patients with paracoccidioidomycosis, toxoplasmosis and Chagas disease, using Leishmania amazonensis, was 23.4%, 0% and 70%, respectively, and it was 23.4%, 12.5% and 80% using Leishmania braziliensis promastigotes, respectively 2424. Szargiki R, Castro EA de, Luz E, Kowalthuk W, Machado ÂM, Thomaz-Soccol V. Comparison of serological and parasitological methods for cutaneous leishmaniasis diagnosis in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Brazilian J Infect Dis. 2009.13(1):47-52. doi: 10.1590/S1413-86702009000100011.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-8670200900...
. In Peru, considering samples from patients confirmed for the disease with a disease length of more than 2 months and using Leishmania braziliensis promastigotes as antigen, the National Referral Laboratory of Metaxenics and Parasitic Zoonoses reports a sensitivity of 83.95% (95%CI 75.34 - 92.56), specificity of 82.76% (95%CI: 72.2-93.3) and cross-reactivity mainly with Chagas disease (unpublished data).

Our study has some limitations, such as the low number of mucosal form samples, the limited number of samples from other diseases, as well as the absence of negative control coming from an endemic area. Therefore, we were not able to identify the protein fractions that interact in this group of samples, which could represent bias, so we recommend continuing the research of these antigens using a greater number of samples.

In conclusion, our study showed that the proteins of approximately 50-52 and 55 kDa of the soluble antigen of Leishmania braziliensis had a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 100%, while the sensitivity and specificity found from the soluble antigens of Leishmania peruviana were 92% and 96%, respectively.

According to our findings, it is important to develop validation of the immunoblot method using soluble antigens of Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania peruviana, and we recommend the development of studies aimed at the characterization and analysis of the reported immunogenic regions in order to continue with the development of recombinant and synthetic proteins, aimed at improving the efficiency of the serological diagnosis of the disease.

References

  • 1
    Sheikh SS, Amir AA, Amir BA, Amir AA. Leishmaniasis. Parasitology and Microbiology Research. 2020; doi: 10.5772/intechopen.90680.
    » https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90680
  • 2
    Organización Mundial de la Salud. OP de la S. Leishmaniasis. Informe epidemiológico de las Américas Num. 11, diciembre 2022. 2022:1-12.
  • 3
    Sandoval-Juárez A, Minaya-Gómez G, Rojas-Palomino N, Cáceres O. Identificación de especies de Leishmania en pacientes derivados al Instituto Nacional de Salud del Perú. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2020.37(1):87-92. doi: 10.17843/rpmesp.2020.371.4514.
    » https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2020.371.4514
  • 4
    Centro Nacional de Epidemiologia Prevencion y Control de Enfermedades. Ministerio de Salud. Sala de situación de salud. Ministerio de Salud. SE 17-2024.
  • 5
    de Jesus Oliveira Gonçalves CA, Carneiro JT, de Souza Cruz EL, de Sousa Neves Filho F, Rivadeneira Cárdenas RC, Guimarães DM. Parasitological association between human leishmaniosis mucosa and paracoccidioidomycosis. Case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020.76:170-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.09.128.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.09.128
  • 6
    Gow I, Smith NC, Stark D, Ellis J. Laboratory diagnostics for human Leishmania infections: a polymerase chain reaction-focussed review of detection and identification methods. Parasites and Vectors. 2022.15(1):1-25. doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05524-z.
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05524-z
  • 7
    Martins ALGP, Barreto JA, Lauris JRP, Martins ACGP. American tegumentary leishmaniasis: Correlations among immunological, histopathological and clinical parameters. An Bras Dermatol. 2014.89(1):52-8. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20142226.
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20142226
  • 8
    Reimão JQ, Coser EM, Lee MR, Coelho AC. Laboratory Diagnosis of Cutaneous and Visceral Leishmaniasis: Current and Future Methods. Microorganisms. 2020.8(11):1632. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8111632.
    » https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111632
  • 9
    Bartholomeu DC, Teixeira SMR, Cruz AK. Genomics and functional genomics in Leishmania and Trypanosoma cruzi: statuses, challenges and perspectives. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2021.116(1):1-21. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760200634.
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760200634
  • 10
    Bartholomeu DC, de Paiva RMC, Mendes TAO, DaRocha WD, Teixeira SMR. Unveiling the Intracellular Survival Gene Kit of Trypanosomatid Parasites. PLoS Pathog. 2014.10(12):e1004399. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004399.
    » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004399
  • 11
    Lévêque MF, Lachaud L, Simon L, Battery E, Marty P, Pomares C. Place of Serology in the Diagnosis of Zoonotic Leishmaniases With a Focus on Visceral Leishmaniasis Due to Leishmania infantum. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020.10(67):1-10. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00067.
    » https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00067
  • 12
    Freire ML, Rêgo FD, Cota G, Pascoal-Xavier MA, Oliveira E. Potential antigenic targets used in immunological tests for diagnosis of tegumentary leishmaniasis: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2021.16(5):e0251956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251956.
    » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251956
  • 13
    Coelho EAF, Costa LE, Lage DP, Martins VT, Garde E, de Jesus Pereira NC, et al. Evaluation of two recombinant Leishmania proteins identified by an immunoproteomic approach as tools for the serodiagnosis of canine visceral and human tegumentary leishmaniasis. Vet Parasitol. 2016.215:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.11.006.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.11.006
  • 14
    Sato CM, Sanchez MCA, Celeste BJ, Duthie MS, Guderian J, Reed SG, et al. Use of Recombinant Antigens for Sensitive Serodiagnosis of American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis Caused by Different Leishmania Species. J Clin Microbiol. 2017.55(2):495-503. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01904-16.
    » https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01904-16
  • 15
    Romero GAS, Orge MDLGO, Guerra MVDF, Paes MG, Macêdo VDO, Carvalho EM de. Antibody response in patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis infected by Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis or Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis in Brazil. Acta Trop. 2005.93(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2004.09.005.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2004.09.005
  • 16
    Instituto Nacional de Calidad. Directive for the validation and verification of qualitative analysis procedures in the Clinical Laboratories. Peru; 2020.
  • 17
    De Abreu Filho BA, Maia KR, Costacurta R, Gonçalves CCM, Jankevicius JV, Padovesi EJ, et al. Evaluation of antigens from various Leishmania species in a Western blot for diagnosis of American tegumentary leishmaniasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002.66(1):91-102. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2002.66.91.
    » https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2002.66.91
  • 18
    Dinç M, Yalçin T, Çavus I, Özbilgin A. Comparative proteomic analysis of Leishmania parasites isolated from visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis patients. Parasitology. 2022.149(3):298-305. doi: 10.1017/S0031182021001967.
    » https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182021001967
  • 19
    Pena HP, Belo VS, Xavier-Junior JCC, Teixeira-Neto RG, Melo SN, Pereira DA, et al. Accuracy of diagnostic tests for American tegumentary leishmaniasis: a systematic literature review with meta-analyses. Trop Med Int Heal. 2020.25(10):1168-81. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13465.
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13465
  • 20
    Ashrafmansouri M, Sarkari B, Hatam G, Habibi P, Abdolahi Khabisi S. Utility of Western Blot Analysis for the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. Iran J Parasitol. 2015.10(4):599-604.
  • 21
    Brito MEF, Mendonc¸a MG, Gomes YM, Jardim ML, Abath FGC. Identification of Potentially Diagnostic Leishmania braziliensis Antigens in Human Cutaneous Leishmaniasis by Immunoblot Analysis. Clin Diagnostic Lab Immunol. 2000.7(2):318-21. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.7.2.318-321.2000.
    » https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.7.2.318-321.2000
  • 22
    S L Figueiredo de Sá B, Rezende AM, Melo Neto OP de, Brito MEF de, Brandão Filho SP. Identification of divergent Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis ecotypes derived from a geographically restricted area through whole genome analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019.13(6):e0007382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007382.
    » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007382
  • 23
    Longoni SS, Marín C, Sánchez-Moreno M. Excreted Leishmania peruviana and Leishmania amazonensis iron-superoxide dismutase purification: Specific antibody detection in Colombian patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2014.69:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.01.012.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.01.012
  • 24
    Szargiki R, Castro EA de, Luz E, Kowalthuk W, Machado ÂM, Thomaz-Soccol V. Comparison of serological and parasitological methods for cutaneous leishmaniasis diagnosis in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Brazilian J Infect Dis. 2009.13(1):47-52. doi: 10.1590/S1413-86702009000100011.
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-86702009000100011

  • Funding.

    The study was funded by the National Center for Public Health National Institute of Health.

  • Cite as.

    Rojas-Palomino N, Sandoval-Juarez A, Solis-Sánchez G, Minaya-Gómez G. Diagnostic performance of Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania peruviana antigens in the immunoblot method for the detection of American tegumentary leishmaniasis. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2024;41(3):294-300. doi: 10.17843/rpmesp.2024.413.13231.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    21 Oct 2024
  • Date of issue
    Jul-Sep 2024

History

  • Received
    22 Aug 2023
  • Accepted
    05 June 2024
Instituto Nacional de Salud Lima - Lima - Peru
E-mail: revmedex@ins.gob.pe